Apogee Rosetta 200 VS Rosetta 800

Pasu AY · 27th March 2005

Dear all,

I own a apogee big ben which is currently clocking my 01v96, rme 0652 and other samplers. Now I am using the D/A & A/D at my 01v96.
I am seriously considering upgrading the D/A & A/D by buying either a rosetta 200 or rosetta 800.

Between these 2:

1) Apogee Rosetta 200 + Big Ben
2) Apogee Rosetta 800 + Big Ben

Which setup will give me better sound?
I want more channels but I am afraid 200 will sound better then 800 (as 200 is a more recent product )

Thanks!!

Albert · 27th March 2005

As far as I know, it's more a question of features than sound. However, I'll also be interested to read comments from those that own both.

max cooper · 27th March 2005

I'm a hare's breadth from buying an 800/96. There's one at the studio where I work sometimes, but I really need one at the house since I've mostly been recording here lately. I haven't heard anything about differences in sound, but I'd be curious to know as well. The number of inputs makes the 800 the obvious choice for the way I work, but I suppose the 200 is a lot simpler to set up as well. I'm also curious about the Lynx Aurora.

rynugz007 · 28th March 2005

well, the 800 is 600 louder than the 200 isnt it. If your tracking on a 200 and you need that little push over the edge what are you gonna do then? mine go to 800

Zwinter · 16th January 2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasu AY

Dear all,

I own a apogee big ben which is currently clocking my 01v96, rme 0652 and other samplers. Now I am using the D/A & A/D at my 01v96.
I am seriously considering upgrading the D/A & A/D by buying either a rosetta 200 or rosetta 800.

Between these 2:

1) Apogee Rosetta 200 + Big Ben
2) Apogee Rosetta 800 + Big Ben

Which setup will give me better sound?
I want more channels but I am afraid 200 will sound better then 800 (as 200 is a more recent product )

Thanks!!

Okay, I really want to clear things up. These two units are virtually identical; with the only differences being the 200 has CODA. When you aren't using the CODA option the two converters should sound identical. FYI, this is straight from the man who designed both units.

chrisrulesmore · 16th January 2007

Well, having owned both (currently an 800), I would say that it does ultimately come down to how much i/o you require. Having said that, the CODA features on the 200 are awesome...in fact, I REALLY wish the 800 were equipped with the Aptomizer feature, as it makes getting maximum level to the converters effortless.

If you only need two channels, I would say go with the 200 for the advanced metering and extra features. On the other hand, if you ever want to track drums at your house, you are going to need the 800.

-Chris

27th March 2005	#1
Pasu AY Gear interested Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1 Thread Starter	Apogee Rosetta 200 VS Rosetta 800 Dear all, I own a apogee big ben which is currently clocking my 01v96, rme 0652 and other samplers. Now I am using the D/A & A/D at my 01v96. I am seriously considering upgrading the D/A & A/D by buying either a rosetta 200 or rosetta 800. Between these 2: 1) Apogee Rosetta 200 + Big Ben 2) Apogee Rosetta 800 + Big Ben Which setup will give me better sound? I want more channels but I am afraid 200 will sound better then 800 (as 200 is a more recent product ) Thanks!!

27th March 2005	#2
Albert Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,489	As far as I know, it's more a question of features than sound. However, I'll also be interested to read comments from those that own both. __________________ http://www.misterpotts.com [URL=http://www.facebook.com/alby.potts[/URL]

28th March 2005	#4
rynugz007 Gear addict Joined: Dec 2003 Location: cincinnati, OH Posts: 463	well, the 800 is 600 louder than the 200 isnt it. If your tracking on a 200 and you need that little push over the edge what are you gonna do then? mine go to 800 __________________ http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Lov...62853367074878

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Apogee Rosetta AD v Rosetta 200/800	gimboid	So much gear, so little time!	6	4th October 2006 12:33 AM
APOGEE AD16X vs. Rosetta 800/200	thephatboi	High end	6	21st June 2006 07:17 PM
Apogee Rosetta 200 / 800 vs. Digidesign 192 ?	mixerguy	High end	0	29th September 2005 05:58 AM
Apogee Rosetta 200 and 800	foible	High end	5	29th January 2005 08:47 PM

27th March 2005	#3
max cooper Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2004 Location: tx Posts: 8,802	I'm a hare's breadth from buying an 800/96. There's one at the studio where I work sometimes, but I really need one at the house since I've mostly been recording here lately. I haven't heard anything about differences in sound, but I'd be curious to know as well. The number of inputs makes the 800 the obvious choice for the way I work, but I suppose the 200 is a lot simpler to set up as well. I'm also curious about the Lynx Aurora.

16th January 2007	#6
chrisrulesmore Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 685	Well, having owned both (currently an 800), I would say that it does ultimately come down to how much i/o you require. Having said that, the CODA features on the 200 are awesome...in fact, I REALLY wish the 800 were equipped with the Aptomizer feature, as it makes getting maximum level to the converters effortless. If you only need two channels, I would say go with the 200 for the advanced metering and extra features. On the other hand, if you ever want to track drums at your house, you are going to need the 800. -Chris