Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upsampling for mastering pingu Mastering forum 9 12th April 2006 12:06 PM
All You Mac Video Wizards - Best Video Mac Vote Sqye Music computers 4 8th January 2006 12:53 AM
s-video / rca cable for video XSergeantD Geekslutz forum 2 13th October 2005 01:09 AM
Upsampling ttauri So much gear, so little time! 1 14th March 2005 03:49 AM
Pro Tools: Upsampling From 48k to 96k Quality Loss? Perspectrum Music computers 1 25th February 2004 12:22 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 20th February 2005, 10:13 AM   #1
bdunard
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nashville
Posts: 669
Upsampling 44.1 to 48 for video?

I have a project that has been recorded in 24 bit 44.1 in Sonar 4. I intend to take the tracks and dump them all into Samplitude for overdubs. Once that is finished the client will use the recordings for a video shoot for an electronic press kit. However, when the video is mixed down the editor told me that he needs a 48K sample frequency instead of 44.1.

My question is can I just upsample the individual finished stereo files from 44.1 to 48K and be alright if the client lip-synced to the 44.1?

Or...

Should I continue to overdub in 44.1 and then upsample to 48K for the tracks at the video shoot? This would probably require me to use a laptop for playback at the video shoot which is no big deal instead of a CD.

I will point out that I saw some software from voxengo that did some sort of upsampling that is free.

I have never upsampled anything so it is new to me... so if you have suggestions on it please let me know.



Thanks!
bdunard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 10:20 AM   #2
PlugHead
Lives for gear
 
PlugHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: steeltown
Posts: 1,735
Send a message via MSN to PlugHead Send a message via Skype™ to PlugHead
I think Chicken software has a SRC - not sure if it's free. A lot of pros use Barbabatch - but it costs...

Are you doing the mixdown, or they? What are they using - FCP/Avid? If it's video, they can take 44.1, but if they said they want 48k, guess that's what you do.

best with it!
__________________
Jay
PlugHead Productions
PlugHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 11:32 AM   #3
kosi
Lives for gear
 
kosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Berlin
Posts: 612
It should be okay, to convert later. I'd
continue working in 44.1 and finish it as planned. Then convert the final Mix via any software. If it shouldn't be lipsync, do a hardware playout DA44.1 and AD48 on another workstation or a DAT.
I do upsamping all the time (software conversion via Pro Tools) and never had any sync problems.

kosi
kosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 12:51 PM   #4
Darius van H
Lives for gear
 
Darius van H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,010
I'd do the SRC before you do any final limiting.
Darius van H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 01:46 PM   #5
Brad Blackwood
Craneslut
 
Brad Blackwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The home of Rock-n-Roll, Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,767
Send a message via AIM to Brad Blackwood
If it's only to be used as a guide track at the video shoot and not actually the production audio, stick with 44.1...
__________________
Brad Blackwood
euphonic masters

"What do I buy and how do I set it?"
Brad Blackwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 05:35 PM   #6
bdunard
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nashville
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally posted by Brad Blackwood
If it's only to be used as a guide track at the video shoot and not actually the production audio, stick with 44.1...
it will actually be for both the video sync and the video mix but we may do some extra overdubbing after the video shoot (strings, percussion, etc.) because of a time crunch so it will be about 95% at the video shoot. The editor is using final cut pro, so I don't know if that matters. I was just curious if there would be any "drifting" or sync issues if I upsampled to 48K after the video shoot?
bdunard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 06:42 PM   #7
Mike Tholen
Lives for gear
 
Mike Tholen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 823
Anytime I do stuff for Film/Video I'm clocking at 48k.
You will need to deliver at 48k even if it's just a guide for the shoot...no need to confuse anyone at the set.
Their standard for digital audio is 48k, you need to give them what they normally use...no excuses.
Mike Tholen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 07:15 PM   #8
bdunard
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nashville
Posts: 669
that would be nice but the fact that it has basic tracks in 44.1 is the catch. They just need audio the day of the shoot (2 xlrs = L&R) It's just the mix that he said he needs 48K so that's what I plan to do.
bdunard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0