![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upsampling for mastering | pingu | Mastering forum | 9 | 12th April 2006 12:06 PM |
| All You Mac Video Wizards - Best Video Mac Vote | Sqye | Music computers | 4 | 8th January 2006 12:53 AM |
| s-video / rca cable for video | XSergeantD | Geekslutz forum | 2 | 13th October 2005 01:09 AM |
| Upsampling | ttauri | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 14th March 2005 03:49 AM |
| Pro Tools: Upsampling From 48k to 96k Quality Loss? | Perspectrum | Music computers | 1 | 25th February 2004 12:22 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: nashville
Posts: 669
| Upsampling 44.1 to 48 for video? I have a project that has been recorded in 24 bit 44.1 in Sonar 4. I intend to take the tracks and dump them all into Samplitude for overdubs. Once that is finished the client will use the recordings for a video shoot for an electronic press kit. However, when the video is mixed down the editor told me that he needs a 48K sample frequency instead of 44.1. My question is can I just upsample the individual finished stereo files from 44.1 to 48K and be alright if the client lip-synced to the 44.1? Or... Should I continue to overdub in 44.1 and then upsample to 48K for the tracks at the video shoot? This would probably require me to use a laptop for playback at the video shoot which is no big deal instead of a CD. I will point out that I saw some software from voxengo that did some sort of upsampling that is free. I have never upsampled anything so it is new to me... so if you have suggestions on it please let me know. Thanks! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear | I think Chicken software has a SRC - not sure if it's free. A lot of pros use Barbabatch - but it costs... Are you doing the mixdown, or they? What are they using - FCP/Avid? If it's video, they can take 44.1, but if they said they want 48k, guess that's what you do. best with it!
__________________ Jay PlugHead Productions |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Berlin
Posts: 612
| It should be okay, to convert later. I'd continue working in 44.1 and finish it as planned. Then convert the final Mix via any software. If it shouldn't be lipsync, do a hardware playout DA44.1 and AD48 on another workstation or a DAT. I do upsamping all the time (software conversion via Pro Tools) and never had any sync problems. kosi |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,010
| I'd do the SRC before you do any final limiting.
__________________ My new studio construction thread now: www.wisseloordmastering.com soon!: www.amsterdammastering.com |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Craneslut | If it's only to be used as a guide track at the video shoot and not actually the production audio, stick with 44.1... |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: nashville
Posts: 669
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Chicago
Posts: 823
| Anytime I do stuff for Film/Video I'm clocking at 48k. You will need to deliver at 48k even if it's just a guide for the shoot...no need to confuse anyone at the set. Their standard for digital audio is 48k, you need to give them what they normally use...no excuses. ![]() |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: nashville
Posts: 669
| that would be nice but the fact that it has basic tracks in 44.1 is the catch. They just need audio the day of the shoot (2 xlrs = L&R) It's just the mix that he said he needs 48K so that's what I plan to do. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |