![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 736
Thread Starter | Higher sample rates -- better for time stretching later on?
Forgive me for my ignorance, but would recording at a higher sample rate (88khz +) make for better sounding, more detailed time stretched audio later on? thanks, Paul |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recording at Higher Sample Rates | Rick Shepherd | Mastering forum | 6 | 26th November 2008 10:48 PM |
| Real Time Pitch Shifting & Time Stretching on the Akai Mpc2500 & Mpc1000 | MIDIchlorian | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 1 | 12th July 2006 07:20 AM |
| Track Count at Higher Sample Rates | rr1073 | High end | 3 | 20th March 2005 10:20 PM |
| Poll: 44.1 or higher sample rates for recording? | music | Q&A with Charles Dye | 2 | 22nd May 2004 08:08 PM |
| Recording important tracks at higher sample rates | Heterodox | High end | 15 | 17th July 2003 05:27 PM |
| |