Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What Comp/bus Comp on VOCAL Bus?? mdjice So much gear, so little time! 19 4th August 2008 10:36 PM
considering selling portico comp for a more versatile buss comp/tracking comp joninc High end 2 27th March 2007 06:52 AM
Outboard Comp Similar to SSL Channel Comp? Matt Smith So much gear, so little time! 1 22nd November 2006 04:06 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 6th August 2008, 01:31 PM   #1
elmolemon
Gear maniac
 
elmolemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 153
EQ->Comp or Comp->EQ for vocal recording?

Hi,

do you prefer EQ->Comp or Comp->EQ if you are recording?

What is your order for tracking vocals?
elmolemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 02:06 PM   #2
synthoid
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 753
I always put EQ before comp. I use EQ above all to cut unwanted stuff (for example, boominess and junk way down low), and I wouldn't want for the unwanted stuff to trigger the comp.

-synthoid
synthoid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 02:44 PM   #3
msmith
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 67
I usually have an eq on both points. As said, one to cut, then after compressors, one to boost.
msmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 02:47 PM   #4
Sk106
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 229
An EQ fist will enable you to control the compression better. A compressor first will compress the frequency profile peaks first. Both ways are useful, depending on the character of sound your handling. Also, don't forget simple auto volume adjusters, which is like automated fader riding. You don't get no compression from those.
Sk106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 02:50 PM   #5
Sigma
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 2,586
I stopped tracking vocals with compressors..now i do it as a ride and bounce after the raw voaclas are cut into the hard drive..why commit and potentionally over hit the compressor
__________________
I believe that we have to content ourselves with our imperfect knowledge and understanding and treat values and moral obligations as a purely human problem - the most important of all human problems"....alberta weintsein

"The notes I handle no better than many pianists. But the pauses between the notes, ah, that is where the art resides." Artur Schnabel

http://www.myspace.com/miketarsia
http://miketarsia.com
Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 02:52 PM   #6
tvolhein
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
On a project I am doing now (female vocal), the first thing I do is a multi-band compressor. There is some serious "in-your-face" mids and harmonics that I have to tame before anything else. Then I EQ back in some presence.


However, I am really interested in what others do on a reguar basis regarding the fx chain of events.

t
tvolhein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 02:56 PM   #7
The dman
Lives for gear
 
The dman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 989
Send a message via Skype™ to The dman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma View Post
I stopped tracking vocals with compressors..now i do it as a ride and bounce after the raw voaclas are cut into the hard drive..why commit and potentionally over hit the compressor
I've been doing that myself lately unless I'm dealing with a singer that is all over the road dynamically.
__________________
My Hybrid Studio
The dman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 02:59 PM   #8
MichaelT
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvolhein View Post
On a project I am doing now (female vocal), the first thing I do is a multi-band compressor. There is some serious "in-your-face" mids and harmonics that I have to tame before anything else. Then I EQ back in some presence.


However, I am really interested in what others do on a reguar basis regarding the fx chain of events.

t

What mic are you using? Just wondering whether that's making things worse for you....

-Mike
__________________
MT

www.vintage-mics.com
MichaelT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 03:57 PM   #9
Sk106
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 229
There is also the option to record the sound a bit lower in volume, so you get the bulk of the sound around -20 db, and use a soft limiter on the top 6 db of the scale, which applies gradual compression for any stiletto peaks over it's threshold. A signal at -3 db will be compressed harder than a signal at -5 db. And, it still serves as a brick wall to protect against digital overload.
Sk106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 08:05 PM   #10
amishsixstringe
Gear addict
 
amishsixstringe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 422
If I'm really trying to punish a vocal (my favorite thing ever), I'll record the track with no compression. I'll automate the volume of the track with nofx on the insert, just making everything relatively equal volume by phrase. Not really trying to make every word the same level though. Then send the automated track to a bus (since in pro tools inserts come before automation and then compressors work really hard). Then put an EQ in there and rip out the stuff you don't like. Hit the L-1 about 3dB max. Hit a de-esser if it needs it. Now hit your favorite compressor. Then another EQ at the end for boosting the presence.

Now that the track is leveled you can use the volume automation on the Bus send to make the vocal sit relative to the music, since it's so compressed it may get burried in more dense thing and become really naked on the sparse stuff.

This is what I do with punk rock and metally/thrashy stuff. But that's usually what I'm working on.


Neil
__________________
"I put my pants on the same way as everyone else. One leg at a time. But, when my pants are on I make gold records. Now give me some more cowbell."

www.myspace.com/amishelectricchair PUNK ROCK
amishsixstringe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 08:18 PM   #11
Sigma
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 2,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by The dman View Post
I've been doing that myself lately unless I'm dealing with a singer that is all over the road dynamically.
not having to deal with tape noise floor and working 24 bit is quite nice i must say

there is nothing worse than the sound of a vocal getting smaller because of a limiter getting nailed..back in th eday my father used to take 1 track and ride the input to the limiter to tape and then another with no compression as a saftey to punch in where limiter got nailed
__________________
I believe that we have to content ourselves with our imperfect knowledge and understanding and treat values and moral obligations as a purely human problem - the most important of all human problems"....alberta weintsein

"The notes I handle no better than many pianists. But the pauses between the notes, ah, that is where the art resides." Artur Schnabel

http://www.myspace.com/miketarsia
http://miketarsia.com
Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 08:22 PM   #12
nickynicknick
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,157
regarding tracking vox with a comp....I think you should have the ability to do both...sometimes it's nice to have lower stuff engage the compressor first then clean it up after with an eq...and sometimes the opposite.. I tend more towards eq then compressor.

Nick
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 08:24 PM   #13
danbronson
Lives for gear
 
danbronson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 596
EQ for fixing problems -> Comp -> EQ for tone shaping

I have a highpass EQ as my first plug on every track.
danbronson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 09:57 PM   #14
Peacock
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 819
Quote:
Originally Posted by elmolemon View Post
Hi,

do you prefer EQ->Comp or Comp->EQ if you are recording?

What is your order for tracking vocals?
The best way is to choose a mic right for the job and avoid EQ and use as little compression as possible or none.

If you are forced to EQ and compress EQ 1st then compress. Think about it-why would you compress something that sounds bad and then EQ it.

Its better to compress a desired sound. So correct EQ 1st. . As always many do this different with great results. So this is opinion only.
Peacock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 10:02 PM   #15
Peacock
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: north carolina
Posts: 819
Quote:
Originally Posted by amishsixstringe View Post
If I'm really trying to punish a vocal (my favorite thing ever), I'll record the track with no compression. I'll automate the volume of the track with nofx on the insert, just making everything relatively equal volume by phrase. Not really trying to make every word the same level though. Then send the automated track to a bus (since in pro tools inserts come before automation and then compressors work really hard). Then put an EQ in there and rip out the stuff you don't like. Hit the L-1 about 3dB max. Hit a de-esser if it needs it. Now hit your favorite compressor. Then another EQ at the end for boosting the presence.

Now that the track is leveled you can use the volume automation on the Bus send to make the vocal sit relative to the music, since it's so compressed it may get burried in more dense thing and become really naked on the sparse stuff.

This is what I do with punk rock and metally/thrashy stuff. But that's usually what I'm working on.


Neil

Man that sounds complicated. I am glad I do not use pro tools to track. Way too many options. i would tweak all day and get nothing done.
Peacock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 10:09 PM   #16
Goldfish
Gear Head
 
Goldfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 73
I prefer to patch in any EQ before comp. The unwanted stuff gets trimmed away fairly early in the game and I don't want my comps to react to unwanted freqs.
Goldfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 10:11 PM   #17
HABBER
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sk106 View Post
An EQ fist will enable you to control the compression better. A compressor first will compress the frequency profile peaks first. Both ways are useful, depending on the character of sound your handling. Also, don't forget simple auto volume adjusters, which is like automated fader riding. You don't get no compression from those.


What exactly is "volume adjusters" Is it a plug in?
HABBER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 10:28 PM   #18
Sk106
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by HABBER View Post
What exactly is "volume adjusters" Is it a plug in?
That's what I had in mind, yes, but I'm sure there are some rare hardware ones around too. Waves MaxxVolume is one example that would be nice if you could actually set the attack and release times of it.

You'll escape the compression effect, but you'll need to set it very delicatly.

Furthermore - whenever I've been the recording guy, which I have for about 20 times - then I always know what the end result is going to be, or very much thereabouts. Therefore I could make the recording as close to the finished sound as possible. That could mean not making an audiophile naked recording and coax the end result out of that, but use more than half of the processing - that I would later apply at mixdown anyway - already on the input, down on wax. That works, and it's incredibly fast work, if you have an 85% set target in mind and don't budge from it. Whenever will those recording ever be used for something else and therefore need flexibility for that? in 99% of the time the answer is "never".
Sk106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008, 04:22 PM   #19
tvolhein
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelT View Post
What mic are you using? Just wondering whether that's making things worse for you....

-Mike
Shure SM7B

t
tvolhein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008, 04:50 PM   #20
JPeters86
Lives for gear
 
JPeters86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 886
EQ for correcting before comp, EQ for "sound shaping" after comp
__________________
Best wishes,

JPeters86
JPeters86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008, 05:43 PM   #21
Sigma
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 2,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPeters86 View Post
EQ for correcting before comp, EQ for "sound shaping" after comp
i really think this is the way most of us have morphed while mixing ITB..during console days it was a little different
__________________
I believe that we have to content ourselves with our imperfect knowledge and understanding and treat values and moral obligations as a purely human problem - the most important of all human problems"....alberta weintsein

"The notes I handle no better than many pianists. But the pauses between the notes, ah, that is where the art resides." Artur Schnabel

http://www.myspace.com/miketarsia
http://miketarsia.com
Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008, 06:09 PM   #22
elmolemon
Gear maniac
 
elmolemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 153
Thank you everybody for your input!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma View Post
i really think this is the way most of us have morphed while mixing ITB..during console days it was a little different
Yeah, but please remember that my question was about the tracking process!
elmolemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008, 06:17 PM   #23
princeplanet
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 401
if you need a lot of eq (not ideal!) then eq first, it behaves quite different in the way the comp "absorbs" things. Too much eq after the comp will always sound nasty....
princeplanet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008, 06:37 PM   #24
Sigma
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 2,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by elmolemon View Post
Thank you everybody for your input!



Yeah, but please remember that my question was about the tracking process!
i don't even eq ino the daw..let alone compress..i see the tracking as a "naked as posible" archieve [naked bieng mic and preamp only]
__________________
I believe that we have to content ourselves with our imperfect knowledge and understanding and treat values and moral obligations as a purely human problem - the most important of all human problems"....alberta weintsein

"The notes I handle no better than many pianists. But the pauses between the notes, ah, that is where the art resides." Artur Schnabel

http://www.myspace.com/miketarsia
http://miketarsia.com
Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008, 11:29 PM   #25
JPeters86
Lives for gear
 
JPeters86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by elmolemon View Post
Thank you everybody for your input!



Yeah, but please remember that my question was about the tracking process!
Sorry, I misread. I don't use EQ/compression during tracking, I want to get record as authentic as possible, to have as much freedom as possible during mixing.
__________________
Best wishes,

JPeters86
JPeters86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0