All Advertisers
| All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sonar 5 | natpub | New product alert! | 3 | 14th September 2005 10:26 AM |
| Sonar 5 | yphs_mst | New product alert! | 1 | 9th September 2005 10:09 PM |
| sonar | whosyourdaddy00 | Low End Theory | 25 | 6th September 2005 08:26 AM |
| Sonar 4.02 Available | signit | Music computers | 0 | 20th January 2005 07:43 PM |
| SONAR 4 is here | Hammer v2 | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 7th October 2004 05:20 AM |
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
14th February 2005, 10:13 AM
| #1 |
| Gear addict  Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 480
| sonar 3 So who else uses SONAR v. 3 or 4, for tracking and mixdown? I'm just curious, because i use it (and have since cakewalk 6)100% stable on my system these days...50 tracks, 12 busses, at least 40 plugs running and no problems at 50% CPU ....yet it seems everyone i know is running PT or Cubase. Just weirded out and curious 
__________________ It's not the tools, it's the talent...  |
|  |
|
14th February 2005, 10:26 PM
| #2 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,834
| Re: sonar 3 NoId, Count me as another very satisfied user of Sonar 4 Producer. If you're looking for others who use and love Sonar, go to the forum at cakewalk.com. Here's a direct link: www.cakewalk.com/forum/tt.asp?forumid=5 --Ethan
__________________ www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts ----------------------- Amazing Telecaster guitar video |
|
| |
|
15th February 2005, 12:24 AM
| #3 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6
 | I used sonar 3 producer for a while. Then i got cubase and i like it a thousand times better. I just find it easier to use and navigate i guess. |
|
| |
|
15th February 2005, 01:00 AM
| #4 |
| Lives for gear  Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 696
| Sonar 4 Producer used here. There are some elegant editing things PT does better but soundwise and for midi, I think Sonar keeps up. |
|
| |
|
15th February 2005, 08:25 AM
| #5 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 480
| life is for losers these days whatever, U PT geeks.....just kidding. Hey Ethan.....We have PM'd before, don't you remember? It was like a year ago over at cakewalk.com... just bein silly, spread the love
__________________ It's not the tools, it's the talent... |
|
| |
|
18th February 2005, 01:30 PM
| #6 |
| Gear addict  Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: ft lauderdale florida
Posts: 318
| i haved sonar...4. but only use it for doing midi in staff mode. never cared much for the way it handes audio..protools just handels it better..do sometimes import audio from musicians using cakewalk and sonar usually wind up redoing it..why i don't know just sounds shallow,
__________________ Gary M.Vandy Audio Prod. |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Linear Mode
