Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd August 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,357

Thread Starter
If I can hear a guitar's depth from playing vinyl, why can't I hear it on my monitors

I'm listening to Minus the Bear - Planet of Ice on vinyl. The guitars sound amazing and you can really tell they were recorded with a room mic in parts. When I listen to the digital mix of planet of ice I don't hear the depth of the guitars. Is this my D/A mainly? I'm using KRK RP6 monitors right now. Which aren't the best, but I'm wondering if upgrading my d/a will give me the depth I need to hear in mixes. Unless It's just a digital/vinyl thing.
heisleyamor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

And you are comparing your turntable & cd player through the same speakers?
What is your turntable?
What is your D/A?
Anything else in the equation - mixer, phono preamp?

There is a very real possibility that the vinyl mix is totally different with different reverbs etc. Very often what you think might be room mics in a mix can turn out to be artificial reverb applied later.

Vinyl in theory has the higher noise floor, lower dynamic range, and higher distortion and wow/flutter. That might add to the enjoyment of the listening experience, but generally doesn't improve the fidelity of reverb tails.

IMO it is the removal of noise and jitter that reveals reverb tails. Getting a Benchmark DAC-1 and upgrading my power amps certainly made a big difference for me. But it depends on what you are comparing with.

Make sure it isn't some simple like an out of phase cable or a mono/stereo width difference. Sometimes reducing the stereo width can increase depth: the reflections that contribute to a 'wide' sound get summed and they then contribute to making the sound more distant and often stronger.
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,357

Thread Starter
They are different speakers and I did use a phono preamp with the record. The record and the CD should be the same recording. They mastered it finally for vinyl. But that master went to CD also. I guess I'm just basically trying to get more depth in my monitors. Unless I need new monitors. hmm
heisleyamor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
Bierce85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: RI
Posts: 930

Send a message via AIM to Bierce85
I haven't heard the vinyl but I've heard the planet of ice CD and noticed it was totally smashed in mastering. This might be taking away some of the depth you were hearing on the vinyl. Just a thought.
__________________
If you're trying to be someone else, who's being you?
Bierce85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #5
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 14,279

Quote:
Originally Posted by heisleyamor View Post
They are different speakers and I did use a phono preamp with the record. The record and the CD should be the same recording. They mastered it finally for vinyl. But that master went to CD also. I guess I'm just basically trying to get more depth in my monitors. Unless I need new monitors. hmm
Reverb and room ambience can really sound different on different speakers. Hearing more reverb/ambience on a pair of speakers does not necessarily mean they are better speakers. The freq response may simply favor key ranges. Also, RIAA EQ compensation on phonos is not always exactly 100% accurate so there's room for some divergence there, as well -- but I'm betting it's primarily the speakers and, then, to some extent the rest of the chain.

The reason I have a pair of NS10m's and a pair of Event 20/20bas is because they both sound very, very different and reveal different things. A mix will sound strikingly different going back and forth between them.
theblue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,357

Thread Starter
well do you recommend I get new monitors or a better DAC?
heisleyamor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

Personally, doing it again, I would buy the Benchmark DAC-1 again in a heartbeat - with a high end pair of headphones, and be able to hear all the fidelity and/or imperfections of digital recordings. You will definately be able to hear reverb tails with these.

All monitors speakers are compromised to some extent - they all sound different, at all price points, so none of them can claim the perfect flat response that they all claim. Your room will affect what you hear - so look at room design & acoustic treatment too.

So what i'm saying is - until you have a lot more money - you are probably better off learning to live with the monitors you have. They probably aren't limiting your career at this stage. Especially if you have something like a DAC-1 & great headphones for critical listening.

Noise floor masks reverb tails. Many active monitors have high noise floor. Many rooms have high noise floor. (The DAC-1 is virtually silent - and i'm extremely fussy about noise). I've got some passive Dynaudio BM5's, and I run a Lab Gruppen power amp outside my room to keep the transformer noise away. That might be outside your price range - and frankly, there are better speakers and amps - it's just a question of how much you want to pay.

Getting back to your experiment - try running your phone preamp through the same speakers, so at the very least you are comparing apples with apples ...

Also - trying moving your speakers around the room. Place them together, hear how they sound (check for phase cancellation) - move them apart - find the sweet spot ... you could be surprised.
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #8
Gear Guru
 
theblue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 14,279

Quote:
Originally Posted by heisleyamor View Post
well do you recommend I get new monitors or a better DAC?
Well, count me in the camp that doesn't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your current DAC and monitors simply because you can hear more reverb on a different rig.

Like I said not far above, just because a given audio system makes the reverb/ambience more prominent does not necessarily mean it is better. In fact, it might have the high end all jacked up out of wack and create that impression.
theblue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #9
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

What are the speakers in your turntable setup that appeared to be better? Hifi speakers? A mono 4" speaker in a portable player?

IMO it's not a bad idea to have a choice of speaker systems anyway - maybe get yourself a speaker switchbox.
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,357

Thread Starter
I was using older Bose speakers. There isn't too much high end on them (can't get too much high end with vinyl anyways)...I don't know. Maybe i just like the way vinyl sounds with out the digital high end that takes away the depth of the mix. I've heard from a couple of different threads/shootouts/reviews that the Lavry da10 is better than the dac1. Not quite sure. I would lovvve to get 1 of the 2, but I need to find a way to make 1,000 dollars in the next 2 months because I'm impatient.
heisleyamor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2008   #11
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,861

Those Bose speakers (yuck!) are those of the kind that used several small widerange drivers pointing in several directions?

In such case, wide dispersion speakers may play tricks with room acoustics and can give the impresion of depth and a diffuse blownup soundstage. Not my cup of tea though and this kind of playback use to mask real depth and dimensions in a good recording.

Other than that, as allready mentioned you can never count on the CD and vinyl to have equal quality masters. Someone I know have analysed (using suitable software to see the waveform) a hundred or so CD's vs vinyl and the limiting and compression on the CD's use to be nothing less than horrible.

Also you can never compare in different rooms and on different set ups. All things can have an effect but especially rom and speakers have a huge effect due to extreme variation.


/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2008   #12
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,037

were these listening sessions even in the same room?


gregoire
del
ubk
.
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yo, would anyone hear love to hear Mix Tips from Jean-Marie Horvat? M2E Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 394 24th January 2008 12:33 AM
Where to see/hear Focal monitors at AES FocalPro So much gear, so little time! 0 2nd October 2007 04:45 PM
I Hear the Radio in My Monitors rystro So much gear, so little time! 5 14th April 2007 07:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:14 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.