Benchmark DAC-1 96k version vs 192 version? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Benchmark DAC-1 96k version vs 192 version?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd February 2005   #1
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 17,808

Thread Starter

Benchmark DAC-1 96k version vs 192 version?

Anyone done the upgrade?

If so whats it like?

I belive they are 192 as standard now

I think I have a 96k version and may send it in for the upgrade.

Does the 'upsample' to 192 make it a better sounding A/D than before? Or different sounding? I love mine so much I am scared to upgrade!!!!

__________________
Jules

Add your reviews to the new reviews area!
Gearslutz on Facebook
Follow my GS picks on Twitter
Jules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #2
OMF
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 61

Hmm

what's with this upgrade? I have heared talk about it, but there is nothing on Benchmark's website.

greets

Tim
__________________
No One Appreciates a Free Lunch
OMF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 739

Re: Benchmark DAC-1 96k version vs 192 version?

Quote:
Originally posted by Jules
I love mine so much I am scared to upgrade!!!!

I know what you mean, Jules! I too love my 96k DAC-1 for mastering and am thinking of getting a second one for an analogue chain now I've been so taken with the Chandler LTD-2 compressors - that's a whole thread in itself, the Chandlers are seriously fab if words like thick, rich, creamy or warm describe the kind of sound you like. As I've said in Mr Blackwood's forum, I don't think they'll suit everything that comes through the door but maybe half the mixes I get would benefit

One feature of the DAC-1 I find very useful for editing/checking/QC is the good headphone amp.
__________________
Nigel Palmer
Lowland Masters
www.lowlandmasters.com
lowland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #4
Lives for gear
 
Ruphus's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,167

Where did you get the 96k examples? I think mine to be of the first batch and it is capable of 28 to 192 kHz.

Ruphus
__________________
"Am I the only one that tires of this "everything is subjective" watered-down-pop-culture-pseudo-philosophy bullshit?" Bravin Neff

Wolgang Burr, former office leader of the German Chancellor before committee of inquiry: "You would not believe what unusual happens daily."


"Patience, young Skywalker - let the object of your desires come to you." JTR

"All thinking men are atheists." Ernest Hemingway
Ruphus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
Ruphus's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,167

PS: I think I just rememberred that the first DAC-1 were capable of 192 kHz, but only meant for 96k, right?
Ok, then forget about my remark.
Ruphus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #6
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675

Nigel
Get one for your analog chain!
And keep us updated on the Chandlers!

If I remember well they were all 192 kHz compatible but only capable of playing back a 192 kHz s/r stream with 96 kHz bandwidth.

I've got a mirror face and a standard one.

Atticus, Bob O. John Siau....any ideas?
__________________
Velvet Room Mastering



"Can you imagine how great the Beatles or Pink Floyd could have sounded if they had used better cables?

I expect a Nobel prize to someday be awarded to an audiophile cable designer, as they clearly are way ahead of the rest of us.
" - DC -
Riccardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #7
Gear addict
 
Nevelicious's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Worcester Ma
Posts: 394

I had the upgrade done. I AM VERY PLEASED THAT I DID IT! For $50 you get the chip and they can give you a dented pot! I did not have a dented pot on my 96K version. The 192 chip does sound better. I thought I was hearing things but after talking with guys at Benchmark they said it does make an improvement. BEST $50 I spent in awhile!
Nevelicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #8
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Always on the Run
Posts: 2,675



is it user upgradeable?

How do you recognise them? Pretty sure my mirror face one is 96K only, the other one has a semi-stepped volume pot.

Jules!

who to contact now that Atticus doesn't work there anymore?

if it sounds better we want it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Riccardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 739

Quote:
Originally posted by Riccardo
Nigel
Get one for your analog chain!
And keep us updated on the Chandlers!
Hi Riccardo,

I won't be going ahead right away, but this is definitely on the cards. With a bit of juggling the analogue chain's ADC will be the HEDD, so that should keep things sweet.

I seem to recall Dave Hill suggested that HEDD processing should be post-compression, and my proposed setup would agree with that (also in all-digital mode where it follows the Sintefex) though I can't imagine it being a major problem elsewhere. Anyone else have thoughts on it?
lowland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #10
Lives for gear
 
rowdy322's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Jackson, Tn
Posts: 1,051

I got the 192 one from Nevelicious and it is fabulous.What a wonderful, clean sound.Now if mama can pull me away from the speakers long enough, I might be able to eat a bite.
rowdy322 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005   #11
Lives for gear
 
atticus's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,581

LOL. I didn't even find out about the upgrade until I heard about it here a few weeks ago. I guess I'll have to send mine in....
__________________
David Seymour
Analog Audio Works
330-354-1576
atticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2005   #12
Lives for gear
 
Don S's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,376

Yes!

Just had it done. I had originally called Benchmark because the pot was making noise. I'm not sure I can hear any difference after the new chip. Especially since I record at 88.2. But, they sent me a demo while mine was in the shop. Jaime was a pleasure to talk to and extremely helpful. I was surprised, I figured they were another huge faceless corporation. Not the case.

Don
Don S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2005   #13
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 68

Can anyone point me in the right direction regarding info on this upgrade?

Thanks.
claveslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th March 2005   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 546

I am also interested in the upgrade info. Hope it's user upgradable.
h4nc0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2005   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,323

Heard about it at AES, but I haven't had a break long enough from work that I can be without it...

I guess I'll have to buy a second so I can do this...

--Ben
__________________
Benjamin Maas
Fifth Circle Audio
Long Beach, CA
http://www.fifthcircle.com
fifthcircle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2005   #16
Lives for gear
 
Albert's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,489

As far as I know it is not user upgradeable, you have to send it in to Benchmark. This has been on my list of things to do for a while, so maybe now is the time...
__________________
http://www.misterpotts.com
[URL=http://www.facebook.com/alby.potts[/URL]
Albert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2005   #17
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695

I have an older DAC-1 (I have had it for about a year and a half) how do I know if it has the 192 chip in it or not?? I would assume it is the 96khz version.

Okay so let me see if I have this right. If I have an older 96khz version, I can play 192khz source info back but it will only play at 96khz right? It will still work but it will not playback at 192 so it will "sound" like 96 to me?

How long does it take Benchmark to turn around the unit for the mod? Also $50 right, and just contact Benchmark directly?
__________________
Michael
not_so_new is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2005   #18
Lives for gear
 
Don S's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,376

Michael,

A good way to tell is by the pot. If it has grooves then it's new version. Mine had none and started to make noise after a couple months. Call Jamie and read him your serial number and he'll tell you.
Ben,
Same here - I told them how much I used it and they sent a "demo" to use while mine was worked on.
Don S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2005   #19
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 68

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don S
Michael,

A good way to tell is by the pot. If it has grooves then it's new version. Mine had none and started to make noise after a couple months. Call Jamie and read him your serial number and he'll tell you.
Ben,
Same here - I told them how much I used it and they sent a "demo" to use while mine was worked on.
Hello Don

May I ask, Jamie who and what's the number? I'm in Australia and of course payed a small fortune for my DAC-1. My pot is smooth but unbearably noisy which I don't think is right for a device of this calibre.

Many thanks,

Peter
claveslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2005   #20
Lives for gear
 
Don S's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,376

315-437-6300.
I can't remeber his last name, but there's only 1 Jamie. Just go to 'customer service" in the phone menu.
or benchmarkmedia.com
Don S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2005   #21
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,695

Quote:
A good way to tell is by the pot. If it has grooves then it's new version.
"Grooves"??? I assume you are talking about indents on the volume pot?? You are saying that on the new versions the pot is not a continuous variable pot it is stepped?

Mine is stepped (and I wish it had a bit better resolution because each step it a bit too much for me) so it is already a 192khz unit?

Thanks, sorry to be thick….
not_so_new is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2005   #22
Gear interested
 
rknaub's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 4

Send a message via AIM to rknaub Send a message via Yahoo to rknaub
Got mine back 2 weeks ago from the upgrade and it does sound better.

Do it!

Randy Knaub
rknaub is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manley Stereo Variable-Mu Mastering Version vs Normal Version robertorton Mastering forum 7 18th March 2006 06:16 PM
Pro Tools 192 vs. Benchmark Dac Converters reinvention.of.man So much gear, so little time! 0 7th November 2005 03:43 PM
HEDD 192 Upgrade from the 96k version jebjerome So much gear, so little time! 6 2nd June 2005 01:55 PM
hedd 192, Benchmark Dac-1 etc. Blackwater High end 7 25th May 2004 07:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.