Why is my Sm7b quieter then my sm57? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Why is my Sm7b quieter then my sm57?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th January 2005   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 128

Thread Starter
Why is my Sm7b quieter then my sm57?

Is this normal or do I have a faulty SM7? I'm running the SM7 and the 57 thru the same pre amp, using the same mic cable, and the SM7 needs a lot more gain to get to the same level.

Just got my first sm7 on ebay and not sure if this is normal.
__________________
...champagne for my real friends, and real pain for my sham friends... Tom Waits
gamrecords is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2005   #2
Gear nut
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 128

Thread Starter
I guess I found the answer right here,
thanks,

michael


quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ê
The SM7 (SM7A, SM7B) is a dynamic microphone. A typical dynamic mic has a lower output level than a typical condenser mic. For example, the dynamic SM7 has an output level that is 22 dB (!) less than the condenser KSM27.

When selecting a mic preamp to use with the SM7 for voice-over work, make certain the preamp has a minimum 60 dB of gain. Here's why:

a) With an acoustic input of 84dBSPL (typical speech level at 3 inches), the output level of the SM7 is -69dBV.

b) The mic preamp must increase the mic signal level up to about 0dBV (line level).

c) -69dBV of mic signal, increased by +60dB of preamp gain, equals an output level of -9 dBV. Not quite to the 0 dBV level, but close enough to work with most line level inputs.

Many modern mic preamps assume the mic is a condenser mic with a "hot" output level. Therefore, it is common to find mic preamps or mic mixers with gains of 40 to 50 dB. This is not enough gain to bring the SM7 signal up to line level.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
gamrecords is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2005   #3
Lives for gear
 
Synth80s's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Beautiful Southern California (cough, choke, honk)
Posts: 852

Send a message via AIM to Synth80s
I'll need someone else to back me up on this, but I think the SM7B has a higher output than the SM7 to make it compatible with a wider range of pre-amps. Are you certain yours is an SM7B and not an original SM7 or SM7A as I sometimes see them referred to?

-Synth80s
Synth80s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2005   #4
Lives for gear
 
Synth80s's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Beautiful Southern California (cough, choke, honk)
Posts: 852

Send a message via AIM to Synth80s
Awwww crap! I totally missed this thread just under my nose:

http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showt...&threadid=8869

-Synth80s
Synth80s is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: San Diego,Ca
Posts: 807

Is there any sonic differences between the original SM7 and the SM7 B......I am going to pick one up soon and dont know wether to but an older model or newer.

Thanks
Ron Florentine
Soundswest studio
ron florentine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2005   #6
Gear nut
 
Andy Sneap's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 131

Send a message via AIM to Andy Sneap
I have both and cannot hear a difference at all.
Theres nothing wrong with your SM7, they are very quiet, but sound great.
Andy Sneap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2005   #7
Lives for gear
 
HudHudson's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, Texas USofA
Posts: 1,680

I've had several outside engineers in my studio pull our SM7 out of the closet and think it's broken when they apply the same gain as they would to an SM57. Maybe the fact that the mic is larger than a 57 suggests to the uninitiated user that it will sound bigger than a smaller mic! But I rarely hear from these people during the session - it's always afterwards, so they miss out on the experience of learning what a new mic might do for their work.
__________________
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side."

- Hunter S. Thompson should have said this, but didn't

www.yellowdogstudios.com
HudHudson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2005   #8
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 3,166

Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
My SM7 (I´m not sure what model it is) is the mic with the lowest output on my locker, and also one of the best sounding mic for snare, distorted guitars and some vocals!
__________________
Think Diferente!
http://www.jeracravo.com
jeronimo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2005   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,716

Same capule as 57, different transformer. Probably traded output for more bandwidth and less distortion.
jbuntz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2005   #10
Gear interested
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: cologne
Posts: 11

I had the same experience. I thought there must be something wrong with mine cause it had less output than a 57. But I guess that's just how it is. sometimes I turn the gain on my 1073 all the way up to get a nice preamp saturation on a voc track. if I do this with any other mic it sounds like a BigMuff....
LeBurne is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2005   #11
Gear Guru
 
lucey's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 12,491

Quote:
Originally posted by jeronimo
My SM7 (I´m not sure what model it is) is the mic with the lowest output on my locker, and also one of the best sounding mic for snare, distorted guitars and some vocals!
snare baby, snare!
lucey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2005   #12
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 3,166

Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
I just looked and my SM7 is the original version... sounds good to me!!!!
jeronimo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2005   #13
Gear nut
 
shanew's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 94

Could it be possible that the perceived lower output of the SM7 might be the result of the capsule actually being a good three inches from the end of the internal metal screen?

Any source on an SM57 is going to be considerably closer to the capsule than on an SM7.

Just a thought...

Peace,
sdw
shanew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2005   #14
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,642

Quote:
Originally posted by jbuntz
Same capule as 57, different transformer. Probably traded output for more bandwidth and less distortion.
hmm if that's the case where's the mods? anyone? I'd be willing to turn one my 57's into an sm7
__________________
Dave
everybody's x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2010   #15
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 34

The SM7B has the same capsule as the SM7. Basically the differences are that the SM7B has an improved hum bucking coil, an improved suspension yoke mounting and it comes with an additional foam wind sock.

The SM7 capsule is different from the SM57 capsule. They are not the same. And the SM7 does not have a transformer whereas the SM57 does. The capsule output is presented directly to the XLR connector on the SM7.

The SM7 is one of the deafest microphones around. You'd be looking at ribbon mics to find something lower in output. A preamp with lots of gain and a low noise floor is a must.
djh76 is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quieter Fan for 960L? rwhitney High end 5 22nd January 2011 02:58 AM
What to look for in an SM57 ? MooWahmBah So much gear, so little time! 20 26th August 2006 11:11 PM
AT 4050 quieter than AT4040???? CassidyGT So much gear, so little time! 8 6th May 2006 01:59 AM
Making my computer quieter matt thomas Music Computers 4 27th July 2005 03:38 PM
G5 versus G4 , how much quieter ? andre tchmil So much gear, so little time! 5 2nd July 2005 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.