3-track tape recorders - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


3-track tape recorders

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd July 2008   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2

Thread Starter
3-track tape recorders

Hi,

We are researching the emergence of the 3-track recorder in the mid-1950s and its use during the late 1950s and early 1960s. We're fairly certain that Bob Fine was the first to make use of one for the Mercury Living Presence Series beginning in 1955. However, we have very little other information. We're hoping to find out more about (1) the history of 3-track recording (2) when the 3-track recorders began to be widely used (3) whether their expanding use arose because of the commercialization of stereophonic recordings (4) the particular kinds of microphone placements that were used for 3-track recordings (5) when they stopped being used widely (6) whether there are any currently in use, for recording or for archival re-releases

Finally, the focus of our project is the use of the three-track in Capitol Studios in Los Angeles in the late 1950s and early 1960s. In particular, we're interested in knowing more about the recordings of Nat King Cole from that time. Actually, any information you might have regarding the Nat King Cole sessions from that period would be helpful.

Any help would be immensely appreciated.

Thanks so much!
bensonstankut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #2
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2

Thread Starter
Thanks moracspace for your speedy reply. We can't thank you enough.

We respectfully disagree with your envisioning of what research is. For us, having conversations with knowledgeable practitioners not only constitutes real research, it is one of the very best ways to grapple with complex histories. What could be better than asking the collective wisdom of a major online community to pool the knowledge of each individual member in an effort to increase everyone's understanding. We really don't see anything wrong with this. In fact, we think this is the best that online communities have to offer.

Just so you know, our questions are part of a much larger research effort and, as with any research project, we're using a variety of methods.

By the way, the three-track recorder didn't just fizzle out quickly. It was an integral part of recording history, an essential link between mono/early stereo recordings and full-blown multi-track recordings. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, as far as we can tell, all of the major studios used them. But, then again, this history is indeed a little fuzzy and we were hoping for more than a snide response, riddled with typographic and grammatical errors. And we say this not just for the good of our own project but with the hope that everyone would stand to gain from this conversation. We hope other members of gearslutz are more generous in their responses. Thanks.
bensonstankut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
yrplace's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: lost angeles
Posts: 1,745

Brian Wilson used three track through 1965 at Western, Goldstar , Sunset and other studios in LA. Goldstar didn't get a 4 track until late 66 or early 67, but Western had them by 1966. BTW it cost extra to record on 4 track in those days......

I have a 3 and 4 track playback stack for my ATR-104 deck which we use for archival playbacks of The Beach Boys and other artist's tapes.

Mark Linett
yrplace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 810

Quote:
Originally Posted by bensonstankut View Post
But, then again, this history is indeed a little fuzzy and we were hoping for more than a snide response, riddled with typographic and grammatical errors. And we say this not just for the good of our own project but with the hope that everyone would stand to gain from this conversation. We hope other members of gearslutz are more generous in their responses. Thanks.
2 posts and you're dissing people on the board already. Perhaps you might go to the library at whatever pillar of academia your parents are paying to babysit your arrogant ass and check out the books first. You might be surprised to learn that three track recorders exist to this day. We just record SMPTE on the center track... At any rate good luck with your research and your people skills.

Ken Paul
Kengineering
Ken Paul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
themaidsroom's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: nyc / london
Posts: 3,510

there is a three track at the magic shop in nyc that steve rosenthal uses as part of his
work with restoration and reissues.




be well


- jack
themaidsroom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #6
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,899


Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
There's a guy in central NJ named John Noll who has or at least had a 1/2" 3-track in his shop. I can't imagine he'd have unloaded it as I think he put a great deal of time into restoring the machine... but I know he was doing a bunch of archival transfers and restoration work with it a few years ago. I recall him saying that the methods were somewhat varied... back in the day when there was one tracking session for a given song so sometimes they'd cut the mono and the stereo "master" at the same time. Other tapes were done with the band on two-tracks and the vocals on the third. He might be a good person to talk to... feel free to say I sent you along!

Retromedia Sound Studios

I want to say there's a bit on them in the Tom Dowd movie as well but I may be imagining that. It's a GREAT piece in it's own right anyway... mandatory viewing IMO.

Tom Dowd and the Language of Music - Home
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.com
mooseaudio.bandcamp.com
Quote:
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 4,058

The Ampex 300-3 track was fairly common. There is an Ampex historical forum on the web that you could look up and ask the people there.
Rick Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
themaidsroom's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: nyc / london
Posts: 3,510

Quote:
Originally Posted by moracspace View Post
Its seems to me that the 3 track didnt get more than a few good years of practical use.Thats not very long for a important piece of gear to stay around.
i disagree
a couple of things: the majority of the capitol era of frank sinatra - a tremendous
catalog of recorded work - when 3 track sounded great, it sounded pretty great to my ears. fatter than
2" 16 track and usually the end result of truly great recording rooms,
microphones and most importantly, players, singers, engineers, and songs.....i think the three
track intersects america's brightest musical hour - it was also the vehicle that was
used by owen bradley for patsy cline and roy orbison - the recent roy orbison vinyl
reisuues sound incredible and fortunately they are 100% analog - the sound of
1959-1960 three track is incredible.


be well

- jack
themaidsroom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #9
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 15,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Paul View Post
2 posts and you're dissing people on the board already. Perhaps you might go to the library at whatever pillar of academia your parents are paying to babysit your arrogant ass and check out the books first. You might be surprised to learn that three track recorders exist to this day. We just record SMPTE on the center track... At any rate good luck with your research and your people skills.

Ken Paul
Kengineering

Wow, I was thinking just the opposite. He came here and asked a question like everyone else here does and got told to shut up, basically. A welcome to the forums might have been a better approach.

And then, instead of getting mad at the response, which I would have done, he remained nice and civil in his follow up.

Welcome bensonstankut.
__________________
http://soundcloud.com/sounds-great-1

-Rob

And these children that you spit on
As they try to change their worlds
Are immune to your consultations
They're quite aware of what they're going through
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #10
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 15,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by themaidsroom View Post
i disagree
a couple of things: the majority of the capitol era of frank sinatra - a tremendous
catalog of recorded work - when 3 track sounded great, it sounded pretty great to my ears. fatter than
2" 16 track and usually the end result of truly great recording rooms,
microphones and most importantly, players, singers, engineers, and songs.....i think the three
track intersects america's brightest musical hour - it was also the vehicle that was
used by owen bradley for patsy cline and roy orbison - the recent roy orbison vinyl
reisuues sound incredible and fortunately they are 100% analog - the sound of
1959-1960 three track is incredible.


be well

- jack
If I am not mistaken, 'Kind Of Blue' was recorded in such an arrangement on such a machine, back in 1959. And it holds up pretty good me thinks.
Sounds Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 810

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sounds Great View Post
Wow, I was thinking just the opposite. He came here and asked a question like everyone else here does and got told to shut up, basically. A welcome to the forums might have been a better approach.

And then, instead of getting mad at the response, which I would have done, he remained nice and civil in his follow up.

Welcome bensonstankut.
I thought the tone and the attack on spelling were a bit much for a noob. I'm guilty of dyslexic typing all the time. But your point is taken.

Welcome to the board bensonstankut.

-kp
Ken Paul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 810

Quote:
Originally Posted by yrplace View Post
Brian Wilson used three track through 1965 at Western, Goldstar , Sunset and other studios in LA. Goldstar didn't get a 4 track until late 66 or early 67, but Western had them by 1966. BTW it cost extra to record on 4 track in those days......

I have a 3 and 4 track playback stack for my ATR-104 deck which we use for archival playbacks of The Beach Boys and other artist's tapes.

Mark Linett
Is the three track stack custom or was that available for those machines at the time?

-kp
Ken Paul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #13
Gear nut
 
Paul Hammond's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 147

Three track was for synchronization?

Please correct me if I am wrong, but I remember seeing Ampex half inch three tracks - 400 series, 300 series, and that the third or middle track width was narrower than the two outside stereo tracks. I saw the heads and that was the case. The reason being is that it was for synchronization via pilot tone to film. That is what I always understood those machines to be for, and this was passed along to me from a very knowledgeable expert. As far as using that track for audio, from what I've read on this post, it seems to have been done, but this was before sel sync, no? At any rate, great post, brings back awesome old memories from a place in time that is very cherished. Makes me want to fire up my old 1/2 inch ampex 350 tube two track! Cheers, PH
Paul Hammond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 4,618

Cameo Parkway had 3 track machines in the early 1960's

they cut the a lot of hits on them ..Bobby Rydell, Chubby Checker
__________________
"The notes I handle no better than many pianists. But the pauses between the notes, ah, that is where the art resides." Artur Schnabel


http://miketarsia.com

http://www.myspace.com/miketarsia

https://members.grammy365.com/users/mike-tarsia
Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 810

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Hammond View Post
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I remember seeing Ampex half inch three tracks - 400 series, 300 series, and that the third or middle track width was narrower than the two outside stereo tracks. I saw the heads and that was the case. The reason being is that it was for synchronization via pilot tone to film. That is what I always understood those machines to be for, and this was passed along to me from a very knowledgeable expert. As far as using that track for audio, from what I've read on this post, it seems to have been done, but this was before sel sync, no? At any rate, great post, brings back awesome old memories from a place in time that is very cherished. Makes me want to fire up my old 1/2 inch ampex 350 tube two track! Cheers, PH
I remember seeing a 400 series once and was told the same thing. That they recorded pilot tones on the center track. We had a Sony APR5003 ar Studio A in Detroit in the Mid 80's that carried SMPTE on the center track and had a built in chase synchronizer. They later came out with a conversion kit that allowed us to switch between 1/2" stereo and 3 track.

Ken Paul
Kengineering
Ken Paul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #16
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 430

According to Frank Zappa's autobiography Studio Z had a three track recorder.
nicpope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #17
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,879

My understanding is that for the most part the majors used three track as a backup to a mono master mix in case the recording engineer lost the lead vocal ride. Our first 3 track hit at Motown was "Please Mr. Postman" in 1961 however we were overdubbing like mad.

Here's some of the best info. Dave was Ampex's New York dealer.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 4,058

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Paul View Post
I remember seeing a 400 series once and was told the same thing. That they recorded pilot tones on the center track. We had a Sony APR5003 ar Studio A in Detroit in the Mid 80's that carried SMPTE on the center track and had a built in chase synchronizer. They later came out with a conversion kit that allowed us to switch between 1/2" stereo and 3 track.

Ken Paul
Kengineering
Doubt that the 400 was ever anything but mono. 440 is a different beast and probably what you are referring to. I had a 300 1/2" three track and I'm pretty sure all three tracks were equal size. "Center track" machines were a different animal.
Over the years I've seen Ampexes, both from the factory and customized, that have just about every head configuration imaginable for all kinds of purposes.
Rick Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #19
Gear nut
 
Paul Hammond's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
My understanding is that for the most part the majors used three track as a backup to a mono master mix in case the recording engineer lost the lead vocal ride. Our first 3 track hit at Motown was "Please Mr. Postman" in 1961 however we were overdubbing like mad.

Here's some of the best info. Dave was Ampex's New York dealer.

Thanks Bob Olhsson - You Rock. I feel somewhat vindicated, somewhat.... ;-) PH
Paul Hammond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #20
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 810

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sutton View Post
Doubt that the 400 was ever anything but mono. 440 is a different beast and probably what you are referring to. I had a 300 1/2" three track and I'm pretty sure all three tracks were equal size.
Thanks Rick, it was a 440.

-kp
Ken Paul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #21
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 4,058

Hey Ken,
I meant to quote Paul as he brought up the 400 first but I goofed a little. Anyway not many people have ever actually experienced the 400 or even know it existed so I tend to jump into the fray when the 440 is called a 400 series. I've seen the occassional 400 on Ebay and I pity the poor unsuspecting buyer that thinks he might be getting a classic! The 440 was a fine machine while the 400 was a boat anchor.
Cheers,
Rick
Rick Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #22
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 810

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
My understanding is that for the most part the majors used three track as a backup to a mono master mix in case the recording engineer lost the lead vocal ride. Our first 3 track hit at Motown was "Please Mr. Postman" in 1961 however we were overdubbing like mad.

Here's some of the best info. Dave was Ampex's New York dealer.
Bob,

Were those machines the Ampex 350 series? I remember seeing a pile of chassis and parts from those machines in the basement at United Sound in Detroit. I was told some of them had originally come from Motown.

-kp
Ken Paul is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #23
Gear nut
 
Paul Hammond's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sutton View Post
Hey Ken,
I meant to quote Paul as he brought up the 400 first but I goofed a little. Anyway not many people have ever actually experienced the 400 or even know it existed so I tend to jump into the fray when the 440 is called a 400 series. I've seen the occassional 400 on Ebay and I pity the poor unsuspecting buyer that thinks he might be getting a classic! The 440 was a fine machine while the 400 was a boat anchor.
Cheers,
Rick

True, True, Rick. I don't know if I've ever even seen a half inch 400 series Ampex! Maybe? 400 series Ampex seemed like a tape transport disaster waiting to happen didn't it? Anyway, I promise not to bring up the dreaded AG-350, another one the unsuspecting ebayer can get burned on! Cheers, PH
Paul Hammond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #24
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,879

Those were film recorders. Jimmy originally built United as a film soundstage and had lots of film-oriented tape gear much of which was never installed. The two Motown three tracks were homebrew and as far as I know were sent to California before being returned to the museum.
Bob Olhsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #25
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 4,058

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Hammond View Post
400 series Ampex seemed like a tape transport disaster waiting to happen didn't it? Anyway, I promise not to bring up the dreaded AG-350, another one the unsuspecting ebayer can get burned on! Cheers, PH
Paul,
Yes, the 400 was a disaster and unfortunately I experienced it first hand!
As many Ampexes as I had over the years I luckily dodged the AG-350! I did have an AG-300, though one expert told me that no such machine ever existed. When I was at Ampex in Redwood City years later I found an official AG-300 manual so I figured I wasn't hallucinating!
All the best,
Rick
Rick Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #26
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 4,618

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sutton View Post
Paul,
Yes, the 400 was a disaster and unfortunately I experienced it first hand!
As many Ampexes as I had over the years I luckily dodged the AG-350! I did have an AG-300, though one expert told me that no such machine ever existed. When I was at Ampex in Redwood City years later I found an official AG-300 manual so I figured I wasn't hallucinating!
All the best,
Rick
we had 300's used them plugged into a VCO for a vari speedable pre delay for the EMT's
Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #27
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 4,058

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma View Post
we had 300's used them plugged into a VCO for a vari speedable pre delay for the EMT's
Hey Mike,
That's one heck of a huge pre-delay unit! Big, fat tone
Rick Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008   #28
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 4,618

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sutton View Post
Hey Mike,
That's one heck of a huge pre-delay unit! Big, fat tone
it was pretty awesome..except i was the assistant..during mixes i had to make sure the tape was wound back so you didn't lose the pre delay in the middle of a take

you had to time it right as mixes would start then stop at whim because our engineers were taught from the "get it in a single cohesive pass" school rather than" stop and edit"

it was kinda tough

if you ever ran out that would be the "man that take was great we'll never do it the same again" :crysign:

Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any companies making NEW multi-track analogue tape recorders? laughton So much gear, so little time! 104 3rd December 2009 04:34 PM
Using tape recorders to warm up tracks w/o recording into tape Farshad So much gear, so little time! 2 12th June 2006 04:49 PM
1/4" TAPE mastering tape recorders Rep High end 17 16th September 2005 05:46 PM
2 track recorders... FormulaReed Music computers 2 4th April 2005 05:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:21 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.