![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 581
Thread Starter | MOTU 2408 / 24 ch. Lightpipe - Question
I am thinking about getting an HD24 and having the signal lightpiped to Cubase. 1) Does anyone know the main differences between the MOTU 2408 MK2 and Mk3? 2) Does anyone know of any other options for an interface besides the Motu 2408 that has 24 channels of ADAT/Lightpipe? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: May 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 389
|
I think the 2408mk3 bumped the maximum sample rate up from 48 to 96 compared to the mk2. I could be wrong so don't quote me... Also check out some of the RME stuff as well as Lynx |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 581
Thread Starter |
I wasnt having much luck finding any other interfaces with 24 channels of lightpipe
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 3,659
|
The RME 2496 has 24 channels of lightpipe...or 12 @ 96Khz just like the 2408Mk3...Either one would work well with the HD24.
__________________ "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." Tolstoy |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,433
|
The mkIII also has some extra input monitoring capability, which probably wouldn't be an issue for you if you're just dumping in tracks from your HD24. If you don't need 96kHz capability and you're not going to be tracking into the computer live, there will probably be no practical difference for you. -Duardo |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: I left my heart, in...
Posts: 1,881
|
I'm using that setup with a 2408 II and Digital Performer. Works great. Advantage of the MOTU boxes are the expandability. I have a 1224 connected as well (I still think the converters sound good) giving me 32 good quality i/o. I barely use the drives on the HD24XR now. Personally, I would not get the 2408 mk I, no rational reason except for it's age. Good luck.
__________________ -David R. "An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way." - C. Bukowski |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: USA
Posts: 581
Thread Starter |
Thanks for the help! What would occur if I tracked at 96khz but was lightpiping live using a card that maxed out at 48khz? Also - wouldnt the converters in the actual MOTU/RME interface be a moot point since Id be doing the A/D with the HD24XR (Mic to pre to HD24, lightpiped to MOTU to DAW)...and on the flip side doing D/A using the 24XR? |
| | |
| | #8 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,433
| Quote:
You may be able to trick the computer into doing it, assuming that you didn't do anything to the audio once it was in the computer...no edits, no effects, no changes whatsoever...but that would kind of defeat the purpose of using the computer in the first place, and it may not work anyhow. Quote:
-Duardo | ||
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Motu 2408 question... | FormulaReed | Music computers | 4 | 31st May 2008 07:07 PM |
| Comparing the 001 and 2408 via lightpipe... Your opinion | Dean Landon | Music computers | 26 | 2nd April 2003 10:40 PM |
| |