![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 239
Thread Starter | Liquid Channel
It's been some time since the liquid channel is on the market and the dust around the first positive and (mainly) negative emotions seems to have settled. I am in the position of testing this thing for a week. Would anyone who has been using it on a somewhat regular basis care to let me know which are some emulations and pre-amp/compressor combinations that work well (if any) and that I should test out first. I am interested in knowing which emulations copy the original stuff fairly well but also simply which ones give good results irrespective of the comparison with the originals. Any other informed comments very welcome too. Cheers, Bob. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| member no 666 Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,110
|
Good luck Bob... you're gonna need it. I would recommend that you forget about the "emulation" designations and try to focus on the unit as a 'stand alone'. I would recommend that you try to have the box stand on it's own merit... which [at least to me] would mean answering some of the following questions: Can you get something useful from the mic pre? [any setting] Can you get a compression thing to work and sound musical? [any setting] Does the EQ make things sound better? Do the textures provided by this unit compliment or conflict with the tones and textures of the music you're trying to present? Overall... does the box 'help' or 'hinder'? I know what I found, it will be interesting to hear about your experience(s)... you should give it a week or so of heavy use before you comment one way or the other.. You should try recording a bunch of stuff with it in a bunch of different ways. I think a lot of your experience will come from where or what your "point of reference" may be [like do you have experience with really good pre's and compressors vs. if you haven't had that kind of experience].
__________________ CN Fletcher Professional Affiliations: R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome SoundPure.com mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33 We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid Roscoe Ambel once said: Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2004 Location: São Paulo
Posts: 547
|
A lot of people tells that the Manley Slam (both pre and comp) sounds great... althought any of them had the chance to compared it with the original unit. So, as Fletcher says, try to check if the FF LC will work for you instead to focus on the "emulation" hype thing... And please, share your opinions then...
__________________ Cosmonauta (sorry for my english) |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Montreal, Que.
Posts: 56
| Liquid Channel
First recording with LC this week had great results using ISA 110 + Grinder A or B Compressor(Alan Smart C2 ) on Kik and snare. very puncy, focused and sat better in the overall mix than original recording. Will be trying out vocals this week. GAK |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2004 Location: São Paulo
Posts: 547
|
GAK, any issues on latency? Some ppl complained that LC's latency make it unusable to track drums... Did you use 96khz resolution? |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Montreal, Que.
Posts: 56
| LC Latency
No latency I could hear, it was no problem. recording at 96K GAK |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 239
Thread Starter |
Maybe I should add that my use for the LC would be as a secondary pre-amp specifically to record overdubs, second and third voices to a main vocal but sung by the same person. I am hoping to get some variation in the different voices as compared to having them all go through the same pre-amp (a "to me wonderful" Millenia STT1). So if anyone has used the LC in a somewhat similar fashion I'd appreciate your findings. Thanks for the feedback so far. I'll get back to you with my own findings in a week or so. Cheers, Bob. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2003 Location: San Francisco CA
Posts: 220
|
give it ten more years then it might be good. but right now buy a really nice high end Pre. Neve, API, Chandler, GreatRiver, Helios, etc
__________________ cannikin life is still sweet |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,601
| Quote:
Not that I'm defending or recommending this box. -R | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: London UK
Posts: 1,777
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear Head Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 63
|
There are way better ways to spend your money. This kind of thing is still in it's infancy. You'll see them on Ebay really cheap in about a year. Eventually the hype will wear off and the next hyped modeling product will come out. I'd avoid this like the plague. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Liquid Channel status | Junkie | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 13th September 2006 08:15 AM |
| focusrite liquid channel | powercord | High end | 10 | 16th August 2006 12:47 PM |
| The Liquid Channel | sheltersoton | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 14th January 2006 04:11 PM |
| One more issue on the Liquid Channel | Revelation | High end | 5 | 23rd October 2004 01:38 AM |
| anyone know about liquid channel? | enginear | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 28th February 2004 06:44 AM |
| |