![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 90
Thread Starter | Anyone using BlueSky Sat 6.5's without sub?
hey guys, i like the idea of a non-ported active monitor but really don't like working with subs. the blue sky sat 6.5 is the only active, sealed monitor i know of that is reasonably priced (yes wish i could afford the klein + hummel...). is anyone using these as full range monitors? and what's the bass response like...is it limited to the 80hZ crossover point that is indicated when used with its matching sub? ta! |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
Blue Sky's SAT 6.5, like all of our nearfield monitors, is designed to be used with a SUB. The sub is an integral part of the system and not an optional add-on. Because of its sealed box design, and because it is designed to seamlessly sum with our SUB 12 and SUB 15 Universal, the SAT 6.5 only goes down to 80Hz (-3dB). Using it without a sub and the requisite high pass / low pass filters, will increase the intermodulation distortion, increase driver excursion and reduces maximum output. For more information, please follow this link. If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to contact me: pascal@abluesky.com Cheers!
__________________ Pascal Sijen Director, Product Management, Cinema Solutions @ Dolby Labs | Former Co-Founder Blue Sky Int. & Audio Design Labs Inc. | I'm also a geek in my spare time. | |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 90
Thread Starter | Quote:
Ok, so even if I'm not hearing anything 80Hz and down, at least the low end I am getting is true without the typical "peak before the fall" you get in a ported design. Is that a fair comment? And how do these issues you mentioned translate in the real world for me: *Intermodulation distortion....will I hear that? *Increase driver excursion....fine with me. *Reduces maximum output...I only listen at low volumes. I do understand and respect the design philosophy behind your speakers but I really don't have the space or inclination to integrate a sub into my room. Thanks Pascal | |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
The SAT 6.5 MK II is -3dB @ 80Hz and rolls off at 12dB per octave below this point. Measurement data is provided in the manual, which can be downloaded by following this link to our website. With regard to intermodulation distortion; if you are sending the monitor a lot of LF content below 80Hz, then you may perceive some distortion, especially at higher output levels. Also, because driver excursion will be increasing as you go lower in frequency, you do risk possibly damaging the 6.5" woofer (although driver protection is provided in the MK II). Again, feel free to email me directly if you have any additional questions: pascal@abluesky.com Cheers! | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Europe
Posts: 2,428
| Quote:
I'd strongly suggest you at least demo a Blue Sky system before dismissing the concept of working with a sub absolutely (notwithstanding the space issue). For less than the cost of an incomplete, ill-advised and sonically compromised set-up of 2 x SAT6.5's alone, you could get a complete, no compromise ProDesk MkII system of 2 x SAT 5's and a Sub8 that works really well. Read my review of the MkI of that system here. My $0.02!
__________________ James Lehmann Voice-Over Artist - Project Studio Jockey www.jameslehmann.net · Use your real name - keep Gearslutz authoritative, accountable and courteous. · Stop the superlatives madness - just say no to gear threads with the word 'best' in the title. · Words or WAVs? The former are interesting, the latter are convincing. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KrK RP-5's? | Mr.MeToo | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 14th January 2007 04:24 AM |
| |