![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| good plug-in/program for changing tempo on acapella tracks | JJabba23 | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 2 | 23rd January 2008 01:22 PM |
| CHANGING PROJECT TEMPO IN CUBASE/NUENDO | MERC476 | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 7 | 25th September 2007 12:43 AM |
| changing pitch - PTHD | JamieMB | Music computers | 10 | 25th November 2006 11:35 PM |
| changing bpm/tempo of samples in cubase | Drool | Music computers | 2 | 21st May 2006 07:12 PM |
| PT Changing tempo w/out changing midi performance?? | d.dot | Music computers | 0 | 11th November 2005 12:41 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Dexter/Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 221
| [Advice] Best hardware box or plug-in for changing tempo (without changing pitch)? What's the highest quality plug-in or hardware box that can do this? I'm hoping for the most natural and least chirpy/phasey sounding results. My application: I've got a completely finished mix with a tempo that's a bit too slow. So I need to speed the tempo up without changing the pitch. I'm guessing I'll be compressing the length of the tune to about 90% of its current length. I'm using an older version of Nuendo (v1.5), if that matters. It has a time stretch routine, but it's a bit too lo-fi for my taste. I'd consider any newer VST plug-ins, or I could get a dedicated hardware box, if such a thing exists. Best, Aj
__________________ "(People) believe that solutions emerge from judicious study of discernible reality. That's not the way the world works anymore. We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality - judiciously, as you will - we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, & that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'' - Senior Bush advisor, NY Times, 10/17/04 |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 690
| Well... I like the elastic audio inside Samplitude... I know newer nuendo has thise ability too but I don't know if its upgraded from the older version. In general, time stretch should just be avoided because it kind of ruins the sound. But, you might be able to try melodyne for this...
__________________ |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Rancho Cucamonga, California
Posts: 1,126
| hmm i tryied many time strechers and i can say no matter how good it is you can only get awy with 10% of the speed before it starts turning into crap..so the idea is to just adjust a little bit and not rely on such a drastic change |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,933
| What about remixing into stems, and then importing into PTLE for Elastic Audio? I'm thinking stems might work better because there would be less complicated sound info for Elastic Audio to screw up. Not knowing exactly how it works, perhaps you'd want to slice the tune into little sections, so the stretching/shrinking would be done on snippets rather than the whole tune. PTLE is so cheap these days, you can get it with a Mbox for the price of a decent plugin. DP has a form of elastic audio, and I've noticed it works better on less-complicated waveforms, which is why I thought 5 or 6 stems might be the way to go - drums, bass, wide-panned rhythm instruments, vocals, solos/fills. In the stems, you'd want to make sure phase-coherent material was not separated into different stems, since that's where Elastic Audio would have problems. I just picked up PTLE for this very reason, but I haven't downloaded the 7.4 upgrade yet, so the Elastic Audio idea is all conjecture.
__________________ "You're either with a native DAW, or you're with the terrorists." G.W. Busch Lite |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 489
| melodyne my good man. celemony_ :: News Check it out.
__________________ I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to get at with your attempted chicken/egg/bowl of shit analogy. -The Blue 1 |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Dexter/Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 221
| Good advice, everyone. Interesting idea with the stems... any one tried this with positive results? I could see it also going the other way - multiple passes of tempo changed stacked on top of each other sounding worse. But I'd guess that'd depend on the algorithm. I'm going to check out Melodyne. I've been meaning to check it out. Aj
__________________ "(People) believe that solutions emerge from judicious study of discernible reality. That's not the way the world works anymore. We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality - judiciously, as you will - we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, & that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'' - Senior Bush advisor, NY Times, 10/17/04 |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: St Paul, MN
Posts: 73
| I have done this successfully with Wavelab's Dirac time stretching and have even had luck using a Akai S5000 on a whole mix once. What suprised me was in that particular instance the Akai beat Wavelab in quality. Others are right though, the is only so far you can take it before things start to get weird. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 884
| I can often get up to about 10% change without artifacts using Serato Pitch 'n time Pro. It dulls the sound just a little, though. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |