Login / Register
 
Mirophone Diaphrams
New Reply
Subscribe
jmorales
Thread Starter
#1
23rd June 2008
Old 23rd June 2008
  #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
jmorales is offline
Mirophone Diaphrams

I am wondering what the differences are in sonic quality and the pros and cons between large diaphragm condenser/capacitor mics versus small diaphragm ones. Thanks
#2
23rd June 2008
Old 23rd June 2008
  #2
Lives for gear
 
Mike Brown's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 3,192

Mike Brown is offline
This is interesting:

www.dpamicrophones.com/Images/DM00670.pdf

Small dia. condensers tend to be a little bit more sensative to high frequencies compared to larger diaphrams.... generally due to mass, size, and electronics of the diaphram.

ALL microphones are different though... throw a large and a small up... gain them similarly (use meters to get them to be equal in loudness) and then solo one and then the other.
jmorales
Thread Starter
#3
25th June 2008
Old 25th June 2008
  #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
jmorales is offline
mic diaphragms

in the 200-300 dollar price range, would larger diaphragm mics or smaller diaphragm ones be better for recording male vocals and acoustic guitar
#4
25th June 2008
Old 25th June 2008
  #4
Lives for gear
 
danbronson's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 878

danbronson is offline
That's a very vague question. It depends on the voice, the guitar and the sound you want to hear.
#5
25th June 2008
Old 25th June 2008
  #5
Gear addict
 
6dyslexicelephnt's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 435

6dyslexicelephnt is offline
for "typical" results, a SDC on acoustic and a LDC on vocals would be very normal sounding.

if you're talking one mic, you probably want an Audio Technica 4033/4040/4050
__________________
I thought that I had attained such a precise ear that I could detect my ear's own self noise! My doctor told me it was, in fact, tinnitus.
#6
25th June 2008
Old 25th June 2008
  #6
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 7,919

John Willett is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6dyslexicelephnt View Post
for "typical" results, a SDC on acoustic and a LDC on vocals would be very normal sounding.

if you're talking one mic, you probably want an Audio Technica 4033/4040/4050
Yup - just right - I agree.
#7
25th June 2008
Old 25th June 2008
  #7
Lives for gear
 
popmann's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,690

popmann is offline
One better...SDC on the acoustic...LDD (large diaphragm dynamic) on the vocals.
jmorales
Thread Starter
#8
25th June 2008
Old 25th June 2008
  #8
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73

Thread Starter
jmorales is offline
hmm

hmm
#9
25th June 2008
Old 25th June 2008
  #9
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161

BioMichanical is offline
I always thought that SDC mics were more accurate because the smaller diaphragm has less mass, therefore it can respond quicker, thus also picking up the low end frequencies extremely well as the high end ones, and everything else in between.
#10
26th June 2008
Old 26th June 2008
  #10
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 7,919

John Willett is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by BioMichanical View Post
I always thought that SDC mics were more accurate because the smaller diaphragm has less mass, therefore it can respond quicker, thus also picking up the low end frequencies extremely well as the high end ones, and everything else in between.
Yes, but people like the colour of an LDC for vocals.
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
tree montgomery / So much gear, so little time!
6

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.