![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 141
Thread Starter | I realized tonight, I suck at Equalization.
You guys ever listened to a really really good mix and than get depressed? ....I had finished a mix tonight and was pretty happy about it, then popped in a band of similar genre only to have my emotions crushed. I've narrowed it down to equalization as being trouble the spot for this particular mix (Heavier Rock) I just cant carve out like the big guys do... Right now I feel like my mixes are like a bunch of scrawny short people sitting shoulder to shoulder ( not fighting for space or anything, just sitting there ) ....while these other professional mixes are like a bunch of big tall people stretching their arms with all the space in the world..... maybe I'm just losing my mind |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| PC Moderator |
1. if you can, stop mixing for a week... after clearing your mind (total recall baby)... check roomacoustics.. you can't EQ what is not there, or what is too much there.. so.. maybe give yourself a chance, and measure your room with behringer ECM8000.. . mostly the diffrence is in roomacoustics (besides beeing not so good at mixing than the big guys) 2. monitorposition big part of the acoustics.. by moving them around you can improve it, or make it more horrible, depending on your luck.. again if you measure your room, you know where the "hotspot" is in your room. 3. check the band and the tracking it's not grooving like the famous band XY? the guitars get easily washy if you add presence or midrange? you have kinda chorus FX when 2 guitars play together? maybe your musicians suck. I had this experience, when I got my first "pro"band to mix. they sent me in 4 guitartracks for each side, perfectly in rythm. drummer was playing tight, and with groove. Bass was great in timing with kick and the whole band... I had to mix 2 hours, and at the end, they used another famous mixing guy, but I can say, that I was pretty close..maybe 2/3 years more exercise, and I am at the same level.. so.. I don't want to tell you, that I am a good mixingguy, or that you have to search the "guiltyness" on your musicians... my point is: check room check placement of monitors check your musicians train your skills.. and then.. check your gear cheers oh and dont get depressed.. life's too short..
__________________ Quote:
www.georgenecola.com produce & mix it shop.georgenecola.com gear & fun blog.georgenecola.com reviews & gear soundcloud.com | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Birthplace of the Soundblaster
Posts: 633
|
hey don't be sad We all started out the same, and I know the feeling of realising how far off the mark you are. To share my experience, the fact is you are not very far, not as far as you imagined. The last time I felt this I thought I would need at least 5 yrs to get anywhere close to that standard. But in less than 5 mths my mixes have improved by leaps and bounds. I have GS to thank actually |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Moderator Joined: Jan 2004 Location: New Zealand/Switzerland/guitar case
Posts: 8,268
|
concentrate on your techniques for eq-ing mids highs and lows are relatively easy also remember that often you need very little, if any, eq, it can be good practice to mix a track with no eq. ignore presets, and standard suggestions (within reason), ignore what your dials say, trust your ears. narco
__________________ Steve Gadd, New York Brass, David Kahne, Abbey Road Mastering, all featuring on Lesley Meguid (my wife)'s album "The Truth About Love Songs", out now! Check out some previews on www.itunes.com/lesleymeguid or Lesley Meguid on Facebook - neve, fairchild, m49 for vox etc.. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: L.A.
Posts: 2,122
| Thats your problem right there. Until you reach a certain level you can't pop your reference AFTER you're done mixing but DURING mixing. You have to check your reference multiples times and at different volumes. Don't just flip it for a sec...listen to it carefully. Pay attention to the details. Levels, panning, amount of effects and of course overall equalization. Thats how you learn. Also take 5 (10 if you were monitoring loud) minute breaks every hour.
|
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New York
Posts: 9,924
| Quote:
Equalization is not something that stands alone as a technique, or some stage along the way before you 'move on' to automation . It's just a tool that you pick up and put down and pick it up again. It is just part of the process of wrestling the tracks to where they need to be. Keep wrestling. Revisit your 'finished' mix. But this time keep that reference track muted on a spare stereo channel of mix and check back with it a bunch of times during your mixing process, not after you are "done". You may learn things about how the big guys work, and even if you don't uncover any instant magic secrets, you will learn as you struggle to match sounds. Whatever you do, don't get down on yourself and say you suck. The solution to sucking is more practice, not depression.
__________________ . “What you ask about is music. What you like is sound. Now music and sound are akin, but they are not the same.” — Confucius | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177
|
Stay away from plug ins if you are mixing in the box. If you are mixing out of the box only use plug ins for extreme or delicate fixes. For all creative and additive sonic sculpting go analog. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| PC Moderator | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| PC Moderator | that includes massorgies and gay-sex if you refer to the old romans.. I am not into that.. I prefer analogue outbard on the 2 bus (summing) and analogue EQs/comp for tracking. but thrill.. who am I to say whats wrong or right.. just my personal opinion. cheers |
| | |
| | #14 | |||
| Gear Guru Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177
| Quote:
But heck if you are not into either there was always sex with animals!!! ![]() (For all you Caligula fans!!!) Quote:
I also like them on inserts in the mix as well. I just haven't heard a plug in EQ or compressor i can trust or like. They all make the audio worse to my ears. Quote:
![]() Cheers. | |||
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2007 Location: London
Posts: 2,417
|
you can do it with plugins 100% like many already do one of the key things i learnt was to know the frequency range that instruments should occupy. for example i spent quite a while trying to make an electric guitar brightish but it would just get piercing. i eventually learnt i had to roll off quite a lot of the highs (down to about 3-4K) and then added an ambience/short reverb preset and added extra highs to that which worked wonders. you need to know how the real instruments are meant to sound so analyse them in your favourite record as much as you can it's good to get frustrated because it drives you to keep on trying to get it right |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 141
Thread Starter |
thanks guys...I'm here now a the studio this morning but I'm going to hold off mixing for another couple of hours. I'll post my mix tonight if you guys care to hear. Maybe I could post my reference as well and see what you guys think i should be doing. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,046
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2007 Location: The ATL
Posts: 648
| my plugs rule My plugs actually make my mixes sound better!!! Just goes to show ya, one mans, floor is REALLY another mans ceiling.
__________________ ![]() Get affordable, professional, Guilford fabric wrapped, beveled edge, acoustical wall and ceiling panels HERE. Christmas special, buy 4 boxes cobalt, get 1 box of cobalt free. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2007 Location: NYC
Posts: 17
|
If you can, get your hands on a nice mix (as in not mastered yet) and use that as a reference. A lot of people get discouraged when they put their mixes up to slammin mastered cds when its really kind of apples and oranges. Maybe that would help or at least put you on a level playing field.
|
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Oct 2004 Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,294
| Quote:
if they're not fighting for space, and they're just sitting there, it sounds like you need to focus more on your compression and fader moves. if you've ever sat next to an a-lister and watched him mix, you'd see him pumping and pushing faders like you never even dreamed of doing. then you'd look down the desk and see 40 other faders doing the same thing because he already automated those to do the same. and i'm not just talking about a little up here, then back down over there. i'm talking about faders moving fast and far, in time with the beat, pumping like the display on a spectrum analyzer. the mixes you love are incredibly dynamic, and the more compression involved, the more those dynamics need to be re-created with faders. keep at it, it gets better. gregoire del ubk . | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2006 Location: Phila, PA/Upstate MA
Posts: 3,432
|
really good piece of advice given to me on the subject of eq: 1 cut is worth 1000 boosts. Try a whole mix with only eq cuts. This usually helps get me started in the right direction. |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear addict Joined: May 2008 Location: Sweden
Posts: 317
|
Also, make sure you're listening at a decent level soundpressure-wise. At least 75-80 dB. Makes it a lot easier to hear what you are doing with eq. Keep working on it. Never give up.
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 151
| |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Burbank, California
Posts: 1,492
|
Sometimes I find the EQ I do to an individual track solo'ed makes it sound like something I really was not going for (or want to hear) but I made the move in light of the whole mix. Once I un-solo it works. To find the frequency I want to work with, I narrow the Q, crank up the gain, and sweep through the frequencies. If I hear anything that is nasally, hollow, too big, ugly, I cut it. I play with the amount of cut and the Q. Usually, I do this listening to the whole mix, but I do it in solo for problem children as well. The frequencies I cut can also be used to create room for other instruments in the same frequency range. Sometimes I pump some bass on kick and bass if I want/need. Shelves are good for this. I start around 110 and move from there. Maybe some others will chime in with their techniques. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2008 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 141
Thread Starter |
I tracked in a small studio with an alright sounding control room monitoring through some Yamaha HS50's (i really hate those) I'm mixing in a different studio on JBLLSR's The instruments sound COMPLETELY different both pairs which is also giving me trouble. I removed all plugs tonight and got a mix just with faders and panning...then parallel compressed my guitars and drums. Hi passed the guitars at 200, added some fuzz to the bass...and that's it for now, the mix sounds like night and day. Still needs tweaking ofcourse, but im much happier about everything now! I just really need to make sure i dont get knee deep in these exhausting type mixes...not good for me, not good for the mix, not good for the client. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,719
|
Sometimes you have to choose the important elements in the mix, and then sacrifice whatever is getting in the way. Years ago, JC Mellancamp said his engineer always starts the mix with the acoustic guitar, and builds everything around it, while others would start with kick, bass, and snare, and drop the acoustic guitar in later. By that time it's too late - there's no space left for the acoustic guitar. Also, the idea that you have to EQ everything is bogus. Or that if you have four bands of EQ, you have to use each one. It's all a matter of give and take. If everything's equal in the mix, nothing will stand out and catch the listener's ear.
__________________ "You're either with a native DAW, or you're with the terrorists." G.W. Busch Lite |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2006 Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705
|
I think you actually have great luck here. You know there's something wrong. You can only get as good as you can tell you suck. The worst place to be is thinking that you're perfect and you just can't do it any better. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear nut Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
|
The only time where I truly and substantially get better at something and hit the nail on the head with it is when I've realised the fact that I truly and substantially sucked at doing it in the first place. SK |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,313
|
Based on what the OP said, and not having heard any examples, my guess that while EQ may be a factor but chances are there are more important issues at hand, namely the SIZE of your tracks. Let's face it, EQ isn't really there to give size to a track--it is more about definition, reducing masking, eliminating clutter, giving elements their "home" so to speak. Some suggestions: 1.) Be harder on your sounds before you hit record. Get BIG sounds happening in front of the mics and make sure they stay big throughout the entire chain. 2.) Gain staging is a factor when it comes to size. Make sure you are optimizing the sounds by hitting that preamp just right. Don't sacrifice clarity, get it in the zone. You'll know when you get there once you get the hang of it. 3.) I can't stress the importance of saturation for achieving 'big' sounds in my own work. Careful use of plugins like CraneSong Phoenix or Oxford Inflator can more than double the size of a track and add harmonic richness, texture and vibe. Learn how these tools can help you and how to get the most out of them. 4.) Likewise, compression and limiting can also beef up a sound in a mix by 'pegging' its level. Sometimes just tapping a sound by 1 db of gain reduction with a limiter can be what you need to get things happening. 5.) Also let's not forget the most important thing--balance level. The most critical and primary part of a mix are the volume levels and proportion of the elements. Honestly, one has no reason to grab for an EQ until you've gotten your balance levels and AGC perfected. I'd explore these avenues before reaching for an EQ or doubting your abilities. Get these straight and you'll find out how obvious and simple EQ can be. Hope this helps someone,
__________________ "Art is magic delivered from the lie of being truth." ~ Theodor Adorno My music: http://www.reverbnation.com/studiodrome |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HELP, need help TONIGHT | "DB" | Music computers | 10 | 3rd March 2012 01:21 PM |
| With a Cheapness (EQs) Inexpensive Equalization for the Budget-Minded Slut | Kent | Low End Theory | 35 | 13th August 2009 08:05 AM |
| Software Based RIAA Equalization For Audiophile Quality Vinyl Archival? | NuMystic | High end | 7 | 11th May 2007 01:38 AM |
| Parametric Equalization | TexasStudioC | High end | 7 | 16th April 2007 04:49 PM |
| |