I realized tonight, I suck at Equalization. - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


I realized tonight, I suck at Equalization.

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th June 2008   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 141

Thread Starter
I realized tonight, I suck at Equalization.

You guys ever listened to a really really good mix and than get depressed? ....I had finished a mix tonight and was pretty happy about it, then popped in a band of similar genre only to have my emotions crushed.

I've narrowed it down to equalization as being trouble the spot for this particular mix (Heavier Rock)

I just cant carve out like the big guys do...

Right now I feel like my mixes are like a bunch of scrawny short people sitting shoulder to shoulder ( not fighting for space or anything, just sitting there ) ....while these other professional mixes are like a bunch of big tall people stretching their arms with all the space in the world.....

maybe I'm just losing my mind
Noize919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #2
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 7,976

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
1. if you can, stop mixing for a week...
after clearing your mind (total recall baby)... check roomacoustics.. you can't EQ what is not there, or what is too much there.. so.. maybe give yourself a chance, and measure your room with behringer ECM8000.. .

mostly the diffrence is in roomacoustics (besides beeing not so good at mixing than the big guys)

2. monitorposition
big part of the acoustics.. by moving them around you can improve it, or make it more horrible, depending on your luck..

again if you measure your room, you know where the "hotspot" is in your room.


3. check the band and the tracking
it's not grooving like the famous band XY? the guitars get easily washy if you add presence or midrange? you have kinda chorus FX when 2 guitars play together? maybe your musicians suck.

I had this experience, when I got my first "pro"band to mix. they sent me in 4 guitartracks for each side, perfectly in rythm. drummer was playing tight, and with groove. Bass was great in timing with kick and the whole band...

I had to mix 2 hours, and at the end, they used another famous mixing guy, but I can say, that I was pretty close..maybe 2/3 years more exercise, and I am at the same level..

so.. I don't want to tell you, that I am a good mixingguy, or that you have to search the "guiltyness" on your musicians...

my point is:
check room
check placement of monitors
check your musicians

train your skills.. and then..

check your gear


cheers








oh and dont get depressed.. life's too short..

__________________
Quote:
"recording engineers don't die, they are dragged into the grave by the shear weight of their balls."
Malcolm Chisholm
---------------------------------------------
www.georgenecola.com produce & mix it
shop.georgenecola.com
gear & fun
blog.georgenecola.com reviews & gear
soundcloud.com

twitter
George Necola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
Saudade's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Birthplace of the Soundblaster
Posts: 633

hey don't be sad We all started out the same, and I know the feeling of realising how far off the mark you are.

To share my experience, the fact is you are not very far, not as far as you imagined. The last time I felt this I thought I would need at least 5 yrs to get anywhere close to that standard. But in less than 5 mths my mixes have improved by leaps and bounds.

I have GS to thank actually cos I read up a lot of the techniques people discuss and try them out myself. The most impt thing is to keep practicing. Go and mix your friends' projects for free. Sign up for mixing competitions like those in thewomb forums. Just keep reading and keep trying out techniques. Don't give up and keep your feet on the ground even when you've improved. There is so much to learn even when your mixes are already sounding pretty decent
Saudade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #4
Moderator
 
matt thomas's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: New Zealand/Switzerland/guitar case
Posts: 8,268

concentrate on your techniques for eq-ing mids

highs and lows are relatively easy

also remember that often you need very little, if any, eq, it can be good practice to mix a track with no eq.

ignore presets, and standard suggestions (within reason), ignore what your dials say, trust your ears.

narco
__________________
Steve Gadd, New York Brass, David Kahne, Abbey Road Mastering, all featuring on Lesley Meguid (my wife)'s album "The Truth About Love Songs", out now! Check out some previews on www.itunes.com/lesleymeguid or Lesley Meguid on Facebook - neve, fairchild, m49 for vox etc..
matt thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
syra's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 2,122

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noize919 View Post
....I had finished a mix tonight and was pretty happy about it, then popped in a band of similar genre only to have my emotions crushed.
Thats your problem right there. Until you reach a certain level you can't pop your reference AFTER you're done mixing but DURING mixing. You have to check your reference multiples times and at different volumes. Don't just flip it for a sec...listen to it carefully. Pay attention to the details. Levels, panning, amount of effects and of course overall equalization. Thats how you learn. Also take 5 (10 if you were monitoring loud) minute breaks every hour.
syra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 9,924

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noize919 View Post
You guys ever listened to a really really good mix and than get depressed? ....I had finished a mix tonight and was pretty happy about it, then popped in a band of similar genre only to have my emotions crushed.

I've narrowed it down to equalization as being trouble the spot for this particular mix (Heavier Rock)

I just cant carve out like the big guys do...
the title of your thread holds a clue to the solution. Saying you 'suck at equalization' is like a sculptor complaining "I suck at chiseling" or a painter saying "I need to work on my daubing"

Equalization is not something that stands alone as a technique, or some stage along the way before you 'move on' to automation . It's just a tool that you pick up and put down and pick it up again. It is just part of the process of wrestling the tracks to where they need to be. Keep wrestling.

Revisit your 'finished' mix.

But this time keep that reference track muted on a spare stereo channel of mix and check back with it a bunch of times during your mixing process, not after you are "done". You may learn things about how the big guys work, and even if you don't uncover any instant magic secrets, you will learn as you struggle to match sounds.

Whatever you do, don't get down on yourself and say you suck.

The solution to sucking is more practice, not depression.
__________________
.

“What you ask about is music. What you like is sound. Now music and sound are akin, but they are not the same.”
— Confucius
joeq is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #7
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Stay away from plug ins if you are mixing in the box.

If you are mixing out of the box only use plug ins for extreme or delicate fixes.

For all creative and additive sonic sculpting go analog.
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
picksail's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632

Quote:
Originally Posted by thethrillfactor View Post
Stay away from plug ins if you are mixing in the box.

If you are mixing out of the box only use plug ins for extreme or delicate fixes.

For all creative and additive sonic sculpting go analog.
Huh?
picksail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #9
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Quote:
Originally Posted by picksail View Post
Huh?

Huh? right back at you.
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
picksail's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632

Quote:
Originally Posted by thethrillfactor View Post
Huh? right back at you.
Wah wah...
picksail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #11
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 7,976

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
Quote:
Originally Posted by thethrillfactor View Post
Huh? right back at you.
Huh? *the computermoderator is shaking in his selfmade-obituary*

*throwing all plugins away and start real mixingcareer with analogue*
George Necola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #12
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
Huh? *the computermoderator is shaking in his selfmade-obituary*

*throwing all plugins away and start real mixingcareer with analogue*
"When in Rome do as the Romans do".
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #13
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 7,976

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
Quote:
Originally Posted by thethrillfactor View Post
"When in Rome do as the Romans do".
that includes massorgies and gay-sex if you refer to the old romans..

I am not into that.. I prefer analogue outbard on the 2 bus (summing) and analogue EQs/comp for tracking.

but thrill.. who am I to say whats wrong or right.. just my personal opinion.

cheers
George Necola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #14
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
that includes massorgies and gay-sex if you refer to the old romans..
Hey no one died because of a good mass-orgy.

But heck if you are not into either there was always sex with animals!!!
(For all you Caligula fans!!!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
I am not into that.. I prefer analogue outbard on the 2 bus (summing) and analogue EQs/comp for tracking.
Same here.

I also like them on inserts in the mix as well. I just haven't heard a plug in EQ or compressor i can trust or like. They all make the audio worse to my ears.



Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
but thrill.. who am I to say whats wrong or right.. just my personal opinion.

cheers
George same.

Cheers.
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
macleodgrant's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,417

you can do it with plugins 100% like many already do

one of the key things i learnt was to know the frequency range that instruments should occupy. for example i spent quite a while trying to make an electric guitar brightish but it would just get piercing. i eventually learnt i had to roll off quite a lot of the highs (down to about 3-4K) and then added an ambience/short reverb preset and added extra highs to that which worked wonders. you need to know how the real instruments are meant to sound so analyse them in your favourite record as much as you can

it's good to get frustrated because it drives you to keep on trying to get it right
macleodgrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #16
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 141

Thread Starter
thanks guys...I'm here now a the studio this morning but I'm going to hold off mixing for another couple of hours.

I'll post my mix tonight if you guys care to hear.

Maybe I could post my reference as well and see what you guys think i should be doing.
Noize919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #17
Lives for gear
 
kooz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,046

Quote:
Originally Posted by macleodgrant View Post
it's good to get frustrated because it drives you to keep on trying to get it right
Indeed! Well said!
mix lots, teach yourself how to listen (how to use your ears), keep at it until every mix rocks...or it's effortless to pull it off.
kooz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
mikymike's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: The ATL
Posts: 648

my plugs rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by thethrillfactor View Post
They all make the audio worse to my ears.
George same.

Cheers.
My plugs actually make my mixes sound better!!! Just goes to show ya, one mans, floor is REALLY another mans ceiling.
__________________

Get affordable, professional, Guilford fabric wrapped, beveled edge,
acoustical wall and ceiling panels HERE. Christmas special,
buy 4 boxes cobalt, get 1 box of cobalt free.
mikymike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #19
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 17

If you can, get your hands on a nice mix (as in not mastered yet) and use that as a reference. A lot of people get discouraged when they put their mixes up to slammin mastered cds when its really kind of apples and oranges. Maybe that would help or at least put you on a level playing field.
Sparks6505 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #20
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,294

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noize919 View Post
Right now I feel like my mixes are like a bunch of scrawny short people sitting shoulder to shoulder ( not fighting for space or anything, just sitting there )

if they're not fighting for space, and they're just sitting there, it sounds like you need to focus more on your compression and fader moves.

if you've ever sat next to an a-lister and watched him mix, you'd see him pumping and pushing faders like you never even dreamed of doing. then you'd look down the desk and see 40 other faders doing the same thing because he already automated those to do the same. and i'm not just talking about a little up here, then back down over there. i'm talking about faders moving fast and far, in time with the beat, pumping like the display on a spectrum analyzer.

the mixes you love are incredibly dynamic, and the more compression involved, the more those dynamics need to be re-created with faders.

keep at it, it gets better.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________

Tapey Compressor | Silky Air EQ | Vibey Plugin Squeezebox...

......

Kush Audio: High End Just Got Higher

____________________
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #21
Lives for gear
 
Stitch333's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Phila, PA/Upstate MA
Posts: 3,432

really good piece of advice given to me on the subject of eq:
1 cut is worth 1000 boosts.

Try a whole mix with only eq cuts.
This usually helps get me started in the right direction.
__________________
Little Studio
Big Studio

"Run to the hills, run for your lives."
-Iron Maiden
Stitch333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #22
Lives for gear
 
Full Clip Audio's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 865

Send a message via AIM to Full Clip Audio
Quote:
Originally Posted by syra View Post
Thats your problem right there. Until you reach a certain level you can't pop your reference AFTER you're done mixing but DURING mixing. You have to check your reference multiples times and at different volumes. Don't just flip it for a sec...listen to it carefully. Pay attention to the details. Levels, panning, amount of effects and of course overall equalization. Thats how you learn. Also take 5 (10 if you were monitoring loud) minute breaks every hour.
Exactly! Ialso find it helpful (especially when working in genres outside the norm) to put a multiband compressor on the master output of my track and then one on the reference track. I then put an RMS and peak meter after both and begin comparing them band by band. I solo the low on both and look at both the RMS and Peak before moving on to the next band. Breaking your mix down like this can REALLY help focus on what is different and where your issues are.
__________________


FCA Myspace
Full Clip Audio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #23
Gear addict
 
Amun Ra's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 317

Also, make sure you're listening at a decent level soundpressure-wise. At least 75-80 dB. Makes it a lot easier to hear what you are doing with eq. Keep working on it. Never give up.
Amun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #24
Gear maniac
 
skatingbasser's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 151

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noize919 View Post
I've narrowed it down to equalization as being trouble the spot for this particular mix (Heavier Rock)
How have you narrowed it down to that?

How have you narrowed it down to your simply your mixing, for that matter?
skatingbasser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #25
Lives for gear
 
Kronos147's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Burbank, California
Posts: 1,492

Sometimes I find the EQ I do to an individual track solo'ed makes it sound like something I really was not going for (or want to hear) but I made the move in light of the whole mix. Once I un-solo it works.

To find the frequency I want to work with, I narrow the Q, crank up the gain, and sweep through the frequencies. If I hear anything that is nasally, hollow, too big, ugly, I cut it. I play with the amount of cut and the Q. Usually, I do this listening to the whole mix, but I do it in solo for problem children as well.

The frequencies I cut can also be used to create room for other instruments in the same frequency range.

Sometimes I pump some bass on kick and bass if I want/need. Shelves are good for this. I start around 110 and move from there.

Maybe some others will chime in with their techniques.
Kronos147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #26
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 141

Thread Starter
I tracked in a small studio with an alright sounding control room monitoring through some Yamaha HS50's (i really hate those)

I'm mixing in a different studio on JBLLSR's

The instruments sound COMPLETELY different both pairs which is also giving me trouble.

I removed all plugs tonight and got a mix just with faders and panning...then parallel compressed my guitars and drums.

Hi passed the guitars at 200, added some fuzz to the bass...and that's it for now, the mix sounds like night and day. Still needs tweaking ofcourse, but im much happier about everything now!

I just really need to make sure i dont get knee deep in these exhausting type mixes...not good for me, not good for the mix, not good for the client.
Noize919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #27
Lives for gear
 
uncle duncan's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,719

Sometimes you have to choose the important elements in the mix, and then sacrifice whatever is getting in the way. Years ago, JC Mellancamp said his engineer always starts the mix with the acoustic guitar, and builds everything around it, while others would start with kick, bass, and snare, and drop the acoustic guitar in later. By that time it's too late - there's no space left for the acoustic guitar.

Also, the idea that you have to EQ everything is bogus. Or that if you have four bands of EQ, you have to use each one.

It's all a matter of give and take. If everything's equal in the mix, nothing will stand out and catch the listener's ear.
__________________
"You're either with a native DAW, or you're with the terrorists." G.W. Busch Lite
uncle duncan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #28
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

I think you actually have great luck here. You know there's something wrong.

You can only get as good as you can tell you suck.

The worst place to be is thinking that you're perfect and you just can't do it any better.

peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #29
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 146

The only time where I truly and substantially get better at something and hit the nail on the head with it is when I've realised the fact that I truly and substantially sucked at doing it in the first place.

SK
Sunim Koria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008   #30
Lives for gear
 
James Meeker's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,313

Based on what the OP said, and not having heard any examples, my guess that while EQ may be a factor but chances are there are more important issues at hand, namely the SIZE of your tracks.

Let's face it, EQ isn't really there to give size to a track--it is more about definition, reducing masking, eliminating clutter, giving elements their "home" so to speak.

Some suggestions:

1.) Be harder on your sounds before you hit record. Get BIG sounds happening in front of the mics and make sure they stay big throughout the entire chain.

2.) Gain staging is a factor when it comes to size. Make sure you are optimizing the sounds by hitting that preamp just right. Don't sacrifice clarity, get it in the zone. You'll know when you get there once you get the hang of it.

3.) I can't stress the importance of saturation for achieving 'big' sounds in my own work. Careful use of plugins like CraneSong Phoenix or Oxford Inflator can more than double the size of a track and add harmonic richness, texture and vibe. Learn how these tools can help you and how to get the most out of them.

4.) Likewise, compression and limiting can also beef up a sound in a mix by 'pegging' its level. Sometimes just tapping a sound by 1 db of gain reduction with a limiter can be what you need to get things happening.

5.) Also let's not forget the most important thing--balance level. The most critical and primary part of a mix are the volume levels and proportion of the elements. Honestly, one has no reason to grab for an EQ until you've gotten your balance levels and AGC perfected.

I'd explore these avenues before reaching for an EQ or doubting your abilities. Get these straight and you'll find out how obvious and simple EQ can be.

Hope this helps someone,
__________________
"Art is magic delivered from the lie of being truth."
~ Theodor Adorno

My music: http://www.reverbnation.com/studiodrome
James Meeker is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP, need help TONIGHT "DB" Music computers 10 3rd March 2012 01:21 PM
With a Cheapness (EQs) Inexpensive Equalization for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 35 13th August 2009 08:05 AM
Software Based RIAA Equalization For Audiophile Quality Vinyl Archival? NuMystic High end 7 11th May 2007 01:38 AM
Parametric Equalization TexasStudioC High end 7 16th April 2007 04:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.