SM 57 Used on MSNBC Interviews - Pres. Debate - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


SM 57 Used on MSNBC Interviews - Pres. Debate

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st October 2004   #1
Lives for gear
 
Exmun's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 613

Thread Starter
SM 57 Used on MSNBC Interviews - Pres. Debate

MSNBC's Ron Reagan and Joe Scarborough used 57's in their post debate interviews. Sounded awesome. I know it's gearslutz sacriledge, but it never ceases to amaze me how good the 57 sounds on so many sources in so many different contexts. Pure genius... and for $80, it's a steal.
Exmun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2004   #2
LTA
Gear addict
 
LTA's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 470

Re: SM 57 Used on MSNBC Interviews - Pres. Debate

Quote:
Originally posted by Exmun
MSNBC's Ron Reagan and Joe Scarborough used 57's in their post debate interviews. Sounded awesome. I know it's gearslutz sacriledge, but it never ceases to amaze me how good the 57 sounds on so many sources in so many different contexts. Pure genius... and for $80, it's a steal.
I saw a few SM57s floating around the pre-debate tonight too. They were used handheld and sounded fine, with no handling noise. Perhaps they had a boom too, but who knows. I actually got excited about something tonight. "Look!!! An SM57!!! I have 2 of those!!"

I bet they worked better than an omni (or cardioid even) condenser wireless in the noisy environment.
__________________
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
LTA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2004   #3
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 52

Re: SM 57 Used on MSNBC Interviews - Pres. Debate

Quote:
Originally posted by Exmun
MSNBC's Ron Reagan and Joe Scarborough used 57's in their post debate interviews. Sounded awesome. I know it's gearslutz sacriledge, but it never ceases to amaze me how good the 57 sounds on so many sources in so many different contexts. Pure genius... and for $80, it's a steal.

THE BEST ALL AROUND MIC YOU CAN BUY. I still use it on guitar cabs and years ago I recorded a number records using the 57 for rock vocals and still sounds great.
Jmess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2004   #4
Lives for gear
 
pounce's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: columbus, ohio
Posts: 943

Send a message via Yahoo to pounce
two sm57's on a dual mount are what's usually used for presidential speaking.
__________________
cheers

paul
paper street audio company
www.paperstreetaudio.com
pounce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2004   #5
Lives for gear
 
Drumsound's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Bloomington Il
Posts: 5,185

Just because somethings sounds fine for broadcast speech doesn't mean it's a great studio tool...


Flame on, I'm just not a big 57 fan.

__________________
Tony
Oxide Lounge Recording
See the Oxide Lounge!
Follow me on TWITTER!

WWJMD?

Come see me on the Tape Op boards!

It's only inches on the reel to reel
Drumsound is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2004   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,010

Sinatra sang into a 57 usually. (That photo of him most people reference with a U47 is a staged promo shot.)
__________________
"Lend me some sugar, I am your neighbor"-
Andre 3000
shikawkee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #7
Lives for gear
 
Absolute's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,142

Yeha I think that what Dean used for those amazing vocals on that scream. They should have patched in some echo

And...maybe its just me but doesnt Kerry's head look like, at some point, it was a normal shape...but then got smushed in a vice?
Absolute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #8
Lives for gear
 
rmx16's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,408

I know Sinatra favored the sm56 too.How you choose a 56 over a tele 251 I don't know

Ed the radial is happening

Peace
rmx16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,010

Quote:
Originally posted by rmx16
IEd the radial is happening
Peace
Cool! I figured you'd dig it.
Good stuff.
shikawkee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #10
Jr. Gear Slut 2nd class
 
chessparov's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,900

'Ol Blue Eyes normally used the Shure 546 at Reprise.

The SM56, as you may know, is the non-reflective version.
(otherwise the same)

With someone like Bill Putnam at the helm, they knew how to pull great sound out of those microphones there.

Another offbeat model that works great on me is the Shure 548.
A bit smoother than the 546 (or SM56), and right up there with
$1000+ condensers I've tried out.

ALL the lead vocals on "Pet Sounds" were recorded on a Shure 545 by Chuck Britz, the Beach Boy's AE.

Darned if I can tell any difference between it and the U47's/RCA 77's used for group vocals on it!

Chris
chessparov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #11
Gear Head
 
cfuehrer's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 40

Send a message via AIM to cfuehrer Send a message via Yahoo to cfuehrer
The workhorse of the industry! Still the best snare and guitar mic.
cfuehrer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,010

Quote:
Originally posted by chessparov
'Ol Blue Eyes normally used the Shure 546 at Reprise.

The SM56, as you may know, is the non-reflective version.
(otherwise the same)

With someone like Bill Putnam at the helm, they knew how to pull great sound out of those microphones there.

Massenburg and Alan Sides swear Sinatra used a 57.
I agree about Bill Putnam though.
shikawkee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #13
Lives for gear
 
Exmun's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 613

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally posted by Drumsound
Just because somethings sounds fine for broadcast speech doesn't mean it's a great studio tool...
Well, I've used it in the studio to great result. My point wasn't so much about how good a studio tool it was. It was more of how incredibly versatile the 57 is while still sounding good. Kind of the same factor that's made the U87 what it is (versatile and sounds decent on most any source--not always the perfect choice, but never sucks).
Exmun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #14
Lives for gear
 
Midlandmorgan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Midland TX
Posts: 1,120

Quote:
Originally posted by shikawkee
Sinatra sang into a 57 usually. (That photo of him most people reference with a U47 is a staged promo shot.)
I thought Frankie used an RE16 ... be that as it may...

Last weekend, I set up a 57 on the drum (term used for instrument and players/singers) at the Native American Powwow in Odessa...one mic worked like a freakin champ...careful aiming seemed to accent singers while still getting plenty of the drum in the house system...

Actually, I ended up selling 2 of my 57s to the Powwow regional committee because of it...
__________________
Ken Morgan
Wireline Studio
Midland, TX

Good Sound Starts With Good Gear - Great Sound Starts With Great Players
Midlandmorgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #15
Jr. Gear Slut 2nd class
 
chessparov's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,900

IIRC the SM57 wasn't around until 1965, and the 546 around 1961 (it's on Shure's website).

In fact, Shure gave him a special gold-plated 546
in light of his use of it there in the studio.

GM and Alan Sides might be mainly referring to both of the "Duets" albums at Capitol.

He seemed to favor the RE15 (or RE16) on the
collaborative music he did with Antonio Carlos Jobim, based on the "Man and His Music" TV Specials. That'd made sense with the mellower vocal style of Boss Nova vs. full orchestration.

IMHO the RE15 and RE16 are more underated than even the SM57 among recording musicians.
Same goes for the EV 635a.

Chris
chessparov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd October 2004   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,010

Quote:
Originally posted by chessparov
GM and Alan Sides might be mainly referring to both of the "Duets" albums at Capitol.
Right, but supposedly he used it's earlier counterpart before those records. Whatever, they're good mics. He was a great singer. That's the real key.
shikawkee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2004   #17
LTA
Gear addict
 
LTA's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 470

Quote:
Originally posted by slipperman
"Sure...." Bobby deadpanned... "I think we got enough in there(the mic locker) to cover the whole she-bang....
I think i busted a gut on that line. Where can i send you the hospital bill





Thanks to this thread, i've started hallucinating the SM57 on everything. There is a sinatra track on a commercial that sounds like a 57. And i was told it was a ribbon mic all these years.... It has a kind of thin fatness to it, the SM57. I'm sure you can eq it, but that upper-mid peak is pretty distinctive once you think you are hearing it. Next thing i know, you'll be telling me mark knopfler used an sm57 on most of his guitar tracks.
LTA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2004   #18
Lives for gear
 
Exmun's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 613

Thread Starter
The story brought a tear to my eye Slippy.
Exmun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2004   #19
Jr. Gear Slut 2nd class
 
chessparov's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,900

The Beyer M500 ribbon reputedly shares a similar presence peak to the SM57.

Slipperman, humble grasshopper (me) thanks you for that story. Overheads and high hat,
that sure seems amazing.

How long did it take you to learn that degree of skill in mic placement?

Was messing around with placing a SM57 for vocal practice today, and must admit that it sounded dramatically better when paying better attention to optimal placement.

Becoming less sure of prior assumptions on mic selection, as time goes by, due to stuff like this.

Chris
chessparov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #20
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,618

Let me ask you guys, why do the people setting up for the debates set up two 57's side by side?. wouldnt this cause a bunch of phasey shit, or maybe even cancel each other out? And if not, why not?

I noticed the other night the mics were the same distance from the source and parallel to each other.

And why do they need two anyway?

maybe two just looks more "presidential"
__________________
Dave
everybody's x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #21
Lives for gear
 
Ted Nightshade's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: state of jefferson
Posts: 1,328

Great story, Slipperman!

I bet a person could get a drum sound with just one of those fancy mics that would smoke whatever anybody could do with several of anything, though. Might need a little cooperation from the player though. Of course I've never cared for these hyped up "improved" drum sounds, with the exception of the manipulation necessary to a little plastic bassdrum tone to make it sound more like a real big bassdrum with calf heads.

The 57 has a kind of distortion to it that just sounds like amplified sound is supposed to sound. Someone speaking into one just sounds "right", even though it's not half as natural as some other mics. Maybe it's just what we're used to? Maybe it's that plus some other psychoacoustic factor.
Ted Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #22
LTA
Gear addict
 
LTA's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 470

Quote:
Originally posted by everybody's x
Let me ask you guys, why do the people setting up for the debates set up two 57's side by side?. wouldnt this cause a bunch of phasey shit, or maybe even cancel each other out? And if not, why not?
Redunancy. Only one will be open at a time. You can't really stop a presidential address to swap mics, cables and preamps if something goes awry.
LTA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #23
Lives for gear
 
everybody's x's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: kansas city
Posts: 1,618

duh

that make sense, I didnt even think about that
everybody's x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #24
Lives for gear
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462

Quote:
Originally posted by slipperman

I will NEVER, EVER, question the power and effectiveness of the Shure SM57 as a transduction device in the hands of a skilled operator till they stick me in a box and whip dirt on me.

SM.

HAHAHA

Too true dude.

I`ve quickly learned a few lessons about high quality dynamics after buying a few expensive condensers recently.

I bought a Sennheiser 441 off ebay for about $250 and it`s my go to mic on vox about about 3/4`s of the time over a U99 I bought for $2000 or so. I`m allmost thinking of selling the thing because I really dig the 441 better.



As for the 57 it`s really a toss up everytime between that and the Royer 121 I bought recently on guitars usually.

I totally agree with what Ted said above especially on amps.

It seems to be the best mic overall at giving the true representation of what the amp actually sounded like at the time.
Sometimes a ribbon will give this euphoric thing that sounds even better than that but if you`ve got a real kick ass tone on the amp and want it exact the 57 is the mic for the job.

Plus you can use a 57 on EVERYTHING which you can`t do with a lot of mics.
__________________
- Kev
kevinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #25
Gear interested
 
bigbubbaj's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 14

Quote:
Same goes for the EV 635a.

Chris [/B]
I have one of those, and it is AWESOME.

Has a really cool tone. A singer I am recording wants to use it for her lead vox track to get the "effect". Who would have thought.
bigbubbaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #26
Jr. Gear Slut 2nd class
 
chessparov's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,900

Methinks SM is being modest.

Anyway...

Yeah the 635a is the fave for bluesy vocals on me so far. Never tried the 664 though and that's
supposed to have a cool vibe too.

Chris
chessparov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #27
pgk
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 112

ol' faithful

the greatest, most versatile mic ever made, imvho. use it on anything. you can drive nails with one. it's the most preamp-intolerant mic i've ever seen; just plug the damn thing into whatever. and you can depend on 'em like the sun coming up. for me, a 57 combined with a royer 121 for electric guitar is IT. fini. i've never been happier with my tone in the studio.
pgk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2004   #28
Gear interested
 
Timeless's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Mile High
Posts: 16

Re: ol' faithful

Quote:
Originally posted by pgk
for me, a 57 combined with a royer 121 for electric guitar is IT. fini. i've never been happier with my tone in the studio.
Let's not forget the pre amp!

The older 57's and R 84 and Coles 4038 and Senh 409/60 silvers

Into a TG2 with any guitar and amp .............. and walla!
__________________
Go Broncos
Timeless is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interviews with Terry Date lydpik So much gear, so little time! 24 11th January 2011 09:03 AM
Best inexpensive recorder for phone interviews? Flymax Low End Theory 4 28th September 2005 02:13 PM
Jeff Buckley on MSNBC! Kyle Ashley So much gear, so little time! 0 31st August 2005 11:14 PM
interviews with gear designers hollywood_steve Geekslutz forum 1 1st January 2005 08:47 PM
some links to gearslutty interviews remo So much gear, so little time! 0 19th September 2004 08:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.