Plug-in's - when they got it right first time..

Renie · 26th September 2004

hi Dave

Firstly, I'm really appreciating and enjoying your input on the internet, thank you for talking about your work.

I noticed you mention in articles that the C1 and L1 plug-in's are strong favourites of yours.

I wondered if you prefer these to their later siblings the C4 and L2 and 3..?

Thanks,

Rene

Mikey MTC · 27th September 2004

The C4 is not a later version of the C1. They're different beasts. The C1 is still totally relevant 10 years into its life as a most versatile (and underrated) tool.

While the L2 & L3 certainly improve on the L1 in terms of transparancy, the L1 is the only one with a mono component. And sometimes you use L1 because it's NOT transparent in certain situations.

Bob Olhsson · 27th September 2004

C-1 is probably the single most under-rated plug-in there is. It takes a good while to really learn how and when to use it, I've been learning more and more about it for ten years. It can be amazingly useful. I wish to heaven they'd make a high-end double-precision version.

Renie · 27th September 2004

Quote:

Originally posted by Mikey MTC
The C4 is not a later version of the C1. They're different beasts. The C1 is still totally relevant 10 years into its life as a most versatile (and underrated) tool.

Mikey

I don't own any of these so I assumed the C4 was a later version of the C1..thanks for the info!

Renie · 27th September 2004

Quote:

Originally posted by Bob Olhsson
C-1 is probably the single most under-rated plug-in there is. It takes a good while to really learn how and when to use it, I've been learning more and more about it for ten years. It can be amazingly useful. I wish to heaven they'd make a high-end double-precision version.

Bob

What do you think is uniquely useful about it for you?

thanks

Rene

26th September 2004	#1
Renie Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: London UK Posts: 1,777 Thread Starter	Plug-in's - when they got it right first time.. hi Dave Firstly, I'm really appreciating and enjoying your input on the internet, thank you for talking about your work. I noticed you mention in articles that the C1 and L1 plug-in's are strong favourites of yours. I wondered if you prefer these to their later siblings the C4 and L2 and 3..? Thanks, Rene

27th September 2004	#3
Bob Olhsson Motown legend Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN Posts: 10,878	C-1 is probably the single most under-rated plug-in there is. It takes a good while to really learn how and when to use it, I've been learning more and more about it for ten years. It can be amazingly useful. I wish to heaven they'd make a high-end double-precision version. __________________ Bob's room 615 562-4346 Georgetown Masters 615 254-3233 Music Industry 2.0 Interview

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Vocal Plug In's ?	MACHINE	Music computers	1	18th March 2006 07:32 AM
BEST PLUG IN'S AROUND	THECRAFTBEATS	Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production	6	11th February 2006 10:47 AM
Plug-in's and hardware	Renie	Q & A with Dave Pensado	1	13th August 2004 08:34 AM
Plug-in's, next generation..	Renie	So much gear, so little time!	30	11th May 2004 08:07 AM
Where in UK is best to buy PT plug-in's..	Renie	So much gear, so little time!	5	19th September 2002 10:58 AM

27th September 2004	#2
Mikey MTC Gear addict Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 415	The C4 is not a later version of the C1. They're different beasts. The C1 is still totally relevant 10 years into its life as a most versatile (and underrated) tool. While the L2 & L3 certainly improve on the L1 in terms of transparancy, the L1 is the only one with a mono component. And sometimes you use L1 because it's NOT transparent in certain situations.