![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mono capability | Tubefreak | Mastering forum | 30 | 20th December 2006 02:46 PM |
| Mono-omnitis | ArnieInTheSky | High end | 2 | 16th July 2006 06:48 PM |
| mono to stereo | Gduron | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 7 | 14th May 2006 04:25 AM |
| dbx 120x-ds: run mono or stereo with mono sounds? | sasha222 | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 4th February 2006 02:50 PM |
| when to use mono effects? | Unknown soldier | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 4th February 2004 01:47 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 130
| Mono I hear alot of talk about monitoring in mono. What would be the best way to do it using my DAW Digi HD. Thanks, Keith |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 130
| I guess what I'm saying is, should I just turn off one speaker and put it in the middle of my desk and listen to the mixes that way? Do I pan everything in the middle? I can see how this would be a good tool to check out where everything lives. I am just trying to figure the best way to get the frequencies living together well in mono then take it out to a stereo mix once I've found a happy balance. I have experimented with this a little bit already. I just wanted to see if anyone has any suggestions on how to do this properly and what is the most efficient way to go about it. Thanks, Any advice appreciated. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 685
| I use Waves S1 on my master fader (width set to 0) Bypassing and un-bypassing makes speedy A/Bing |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,460
| don't drop a channel, you want to sum them. i don't suppose you've got any gear w/ a mono button? if not, what about creating a mono master track in PT? i've never tried it, but i suppose that should work.
__________________ She's tidied up and I can't find anything |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 130
| I don't have any gear that has a mono button. I will try the other suggestions. Thanks for the input. ![]() |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
What are you monitoring through? No console or anything?
__________________ _________________ "What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?" Randy Wright http://www.myspace.com/djui5 | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Are there no slutz here?????? Buy some gear! That is how you solve everything! :) I suggest you buy a monitoring solution of some sorts if you do not have one. Any high end, big phat API or Neve will have the mono button you need. Or go cheap like me and get a Presonus Central station. Either way you kill two birds with one stone! You get your mono and feed the monkey! D |
|
| | #8 |
| Motown legend Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 5,273
| You want to both sum them AND THEN drop one speaker. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Bloomington Il
Posts: 3,600
| Doesn't the PT master fader have a mono button? The DP one does.
__________________ Tony Oxide Lounge Recording See the Oxide Lounge! WWJMD? Come see me on the Tape Op boards! "If I have to flip flop more than three times in an A/B test to figure out what the difference is, I lose interest in that difference.'--Tchad Blake |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
No...and no panning either........ Sucks if you ask me. Digi........are you out there?.........might be a good idea for the next upgrade........wake up fokkers.
__________________ _________________ "What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?" Randy Wright http://www.myspace.com/djui5 | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,035
| curious about dropping to one speaker only... why? what is wrong with listening mono on two speakers playing the same thing?
__________________ Matous Godik |
| | |
| | #12 |
| 3 + infractions, membership under review with GS admin Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Foxboro, MA USA
Posts: 5,783
| The Coleman M3 DAW monitor does a wonderful job of this... it's what I have on my rig [at least it will be until I get my full time Avocet... but even that doesn't have the ability to mute the individual speaker outputs like the M3]. I work in "one speaker mono" all the time... the M3 has individual speaker mutes as well as a mono button. It's pretty cool that way.
__________________ [COLOR="White"][/COLOR] [SIZE="2"][b]Fletcher[/b][/SIZE] If you have a question please email me at [email]Fletcher@mercenary.com[/email] instead of using the PM system... I very rarely check that system and it could take a while to get a response. I can also be found at either address below: [size=2][url=http://recforums.prosoundweb.com][b]R/E/P[/b][/url][/size] the [b]R[/b]ecording [b]E[/b]ngineer and [b]P[/b]roducer forums [url=http://www.mercenary.com][b]Mercenary Audio[/b][/url] [size=1][b]mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33[/b] We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid [b][url=http://www.ericambel.com/index.htm]Roscoe[/url] Ambel once said[/b]: Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light[/size] |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,035
| why one speaker mono? d*a*m*n, I have to try ;-)
__________________ Matous Godik |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 685
| One speaker is just more realistic mono - like a little TV or clock radio. The Waves S1 does this as well. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,066
| Yep, Samplitude has a mono switch on the master too. In another discussion over at PSW I picked up the note which sounded like summing into mono wouldn´t be enough, but that one of the channels was needing a 90 degree phase-shift then. What about that? Would merely summing mean phase interference ( which we try to detect at monitoring ) while a 90° shift would prevent from that? And on the other hand, could it be that the phase shift would be too ideal / supportive to the validated material as it would eventually impede detection of conflicting contents of the merged channels? When does a 90° shift make most sense? Ruphus
__________________ "Am I the only one that tires of this "everything is subjective" watered-down-pop-culture-pseudo-philosophy bullshit?" Bravin Neff Wolgang Burr, former office leader of the German Chancellor before committee of inquiry: "You would not believe what unusual happens daily." "Patience, young Skywalker - let the object of your desires come to you." JTR "All thinking men are atheists." Ernest Hemingway |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |