![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Thread Starter | Lynx Aurora in a Mixerless Setup? - Analog/in to analog/out for monitering? With the Lynx Aurora, does it have a feature to route a set of outputs as a send for monitors or the artist - or both? Essentially with my setup I would have mic Pres to AD/DA and then get a monitoring system like an SPL or maybe even a Dangerous. but I' having trouble picturing how this would be setup. Obviously two DA outputs will be used as a stereo master output from Cubase which will go into the monitoring system... I guess what I'm wondering is if the Lynx Aurora has internal analog summing which can be routed to two outputs? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear | No, it is just a converter. Use as many channels of D/A as you need to setup your CUE mixes, etc. but if you want summing you'll have to do that ITB (which is very easy, you just create a stereo send on every channel that goes straight to a pair of outputs). This is not a limitation of the Aurora. Any standalone converter would yield the same.
__________________ Joshua Aaron President/Chief Engineer AudioLot/AudioLot Studios High End Pro Audio Sales & Consulting Recording/Music Production/Mixing http://www.audiolot.com Follow AudioLot on Facebook for AudioLot's BIG DEAL Gear Specials, Morning Mix Tips, and more by clicking here AudioLot is located in Hollywood, CA. If you're in the LA area and are interested in coming by to see any of the gear we carry in person, please let us know. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 1,434
| The AES-16(e) would do this though wouldn't it? Surely the sound doesn't have through the DAW for monitoring does it? |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
You do not need an AES16 card in order to use the Aurora. The Aurora can work in standalone mode and do straight conversion without a computer. It will not however perform summing tasks. If you want to knock down multiple channels into one stereo stream in order to send that out to a CUE mixer or headphone amp, you would either need an external summing box OR you would do it as I described above using a DAW. If you go the summing box route, you're still going to need to change every track from digital to analog (provided that you are recording to tape) so the reality is you do it in a DAW. | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Thread Starter | Sorry I'm probably not choosing my words right. I'm asking if there is a assignable mix/master bus for the analog signal BEFORE it gets converted. For example. 1.)I have a guitar and piano track in the DAW and I'm tracking vocals. 2.)The guitar and piano are coming out of the daw on channel 15 and 16. 3.)Channels 15 and 16 go into the monitoring system and I use a send to send the guitar and piano to the vocalists headphones. 4.)The Vocalist wants to hear them selves in the headphones 5.) The Vocal chain is mic -> pre -> AD/DA input 1. Now is it possible to take input 1 and route it to my monitoring outputs before it gets converted and have it simultaneously record? Because if I were to just send them signal from the DAW as they are recording they get the AD/DA delay. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Thread Starter | bump |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 1,434
| Quote:
By using CueMix with my HD192 / PCIe-424 setup, I can route and mix any combination of inputs to any combination of outputs without having Logic running and the latency is really hardly noticeable. Now, I don't know whether this routing and summing is taking place inside the HD192 or inside the PCIe card or inside the Mac, but what I do know is that as soon as the audio is routed through Logic, the latency is WAY too much to use for tracking. The question I was trying to ask is that surely a combination of Aurora + PCI AES-16e would offer a solution comparable to MOTU's. If not, then I'm surprised to say the least. | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London
Posts: 1,434
| Quote:
Have you checked out the CraneSong Spider? Maybe thats a solution. | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Thread Starter | Well I totally would be willing to get a console but I'm on a tight budget. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Thread Starter | anyone else? surely someone with a Lynx Aurora would know this... |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: London
Posts: 2,417
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 275
| It's like what Joshua said. It can't be done with just the converter alone. I used the Aurora 16 just last week. There is no such mixing feature on the unit itself. If you are using the Aurora as a standalone unit, the answer to your question is no. --Al
__________________ The best of music is from an analog tape. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Thread Starter | A Presonus firestudio can do this but the Lynx cannot? It's funny how sometimes cheaper gear comes with better features. If I wanted to do this with the Lynx Aurora... how would I? Just make a y cable and send one to the aurora and one to some kind of monitoring system? |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,172
| Sounds like a patchbay might be in order. But you'd still need something to sum the channels 15/16 with the gtr.....maybe a Mackie would do? Doesn't sound like you need much. The options you're looking for are probably located in the Lynx AES16 card you mentioned. I think it does have a low latency monitoring software mixer but I can't say for sure. Check it out on their site. The Firestation was made to solve all the problems associated with computer based recording.....the PCI card, Latency free monitoring, etc.... The Aurora was made to offer high end conversion. Just 2 different aims really. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 558
Thread Starter | Is what I would need is a unit with 16 inputs and those 16 inputs are hardwired to the 16 outputs without any coloration (essentially they would be thru channels). and then between those input and outputs i need an split off on each channel and what it would split off to is a routing system. You would control the routing on the front panel, each channel would have 4 knobs which would be the sends. to activate a send you push in the knob and turn for send level. There could also be a master section to control main monitor mix levels and you could even insert it onto the sends. You would put this unit right before your AD/DA conversion. Example of unaffected chain: Vocal Mic -> Preamp -> "The Unit" channel 1 -> Straight out channel 1 with no coloration/distortion -> AD/DA channel 1. Example of split off point: ...."The Unit" channel 1 -> Straight out channel 1.... ____________________| ____________________| ___________________.\/ ____________________Routing Bus ---> Send 1 engaged --> Send 1 out--->Headphone Box--->Vocalists headphones And this could be useful if you have a console as well because you would no longer have to use your consoles sends. You could have another unit for your DA conversion as well and link the two together. Anything like this out there? |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LYNX AURORA 16 AES/EBU OUTPUT TO ANALOG | Fuel | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 8th March 2011 08:09 PM |
| Please HELP quick!!! *digital chatter noise coming from Lynx Aurora/AES-16 setup. | Alex Wyler | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 15th February 2009 12:13 PM |
| lynx aurora 16 analog reference level ?? | jwh1192 | High end | 0 | 23rd March 2008 11:27 PM |
| I've got an analog setup, and I don't know how to use it right. | vintage | Low End Theory | 1 | 28th September 2007 05:53 PM |
| |