![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: michigan
Posts: 1,456
Thread Starter | do new mytek converters require a "burn in" period?
hello. i just bought a new mytek stereo 96 and the salesperson told me it required a 12 hour "burn in" period so that the internal components can brake in thus smoothing the sound of the unit out. i am curious to know more about this. can someone elaborate on this? thanks! -jay |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234
| Yes, this is generally required when you buy equipment from a slimy salesperson. Moslty, it bakes the smell of cheap cologne out of the unit. -tINY |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,224
|
hey that's not cologne, it's body splash ok? geez.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2004 Location: chicago
Posts: 47
|
never got that tip when I bought mine
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Detroit Rock City
Posts: 276
|
actually when i got my lucid ad9624 spiffed up by jim williams at audio upgrades, he said the same thing. the new capacitors he put in required a 20 hour "break in" period to charge to their full capacity and react correctly. 'like breaking in a new pair of shoes' jim put it. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: michigan
Posts: 1,456
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: michigan
Posts: 1,456
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Detroit Rock City
Posts: 276
|
honestly, i didn't give it much of a listen before i 'burned it in'. i guess i'm more concerned that i don't hear much of a difference from before i sent it out to be upgraded to what it sounds like now.....hmmm.... ...maybe more burn in time?? |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Detroit Rock City
Posts: 276
|
totally off topic.....just saw you're near the "D". very cool. dirty south (downriver), and not too proud of it, myself. may have to check your place out sometime. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: London
Posts: 901
|
My Mytek Stereo96 definitely sounds (marginally) nicer now than when I first got it. However, I leave it on most of the time and that's probably a bigger factor than the burn-in.
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2003 Location: garden city, mi
Posts: 282
|
When you say burn in period..................do you mean hust leave it on for 12 straight hours or after 12 hours of general use it'll improve? I never got that tip with mine either.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Voiding warranties Joined: Feb 2004 Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 10,081
|
Semiconductors don't usually need any break in, but the passive capacitors do. Michal uses Wima FKP-2 polyprops in the mytek, I use the very expensive MIT MultiCaps. Their designer, Richard Marsh recommends a 50 hour break in. Thats 50 hours of music running through it, not just powered up. Bas Lin of Reliable Capacitors says the same things as he provides a lot of caps to NASA, the Air Force, etc, besides the audio crowd. Can't tell you how many times a customer has called a few months later to ask if the improved sound is for real or are they just hearing things. Now I inform everyone of this so they don't doubt their hearing. Jim Williams Audio Upgrades
__________________ Jim Williams Audio Upgrades |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,224
|
how much worse is it to send the outputs into a channel of a mackie, and then into monitors?
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: London
Posts: 901
|
For me it got better after being left on... whether I'd feel the same if I switched it off and left it for a while I don't know. I doubt it.
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234
| So, if I'm paying that kind of money for a unit and it needs 50 hours of burn in for the caps to settle out - I want it done at the factory.... Besides, running a burn in is good manufacturing practice for low-volume high-price units. If there are short term failures, you see them before they ship, thus maintaining an air of quality. I don't mind breaking in $400 studio monitors, but for a one-kilobuck converter, I want it burned in and ready to go. -tINY |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear nut Joined: Mar 2004 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 131
|
The only way to burn them suckers in is to play 5 hours of Deep Purple's Machine Head full bore ! DONE.
__________________ Paul |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2004 Location: michigan
Posts: 1,456
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Manufacturer Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18
|
There's a difference between burn-in and warm-up. It's pretty standard for high-end manufacturers to perform an extended burn-in between assembly and final testing/calibration. Warm-up is often necessary for some high-precision circuits, like A/D and D/A converters, or for gear with class-A circuitry. We recommend letting our 2192 converter warm-up for 20 minutes after power-on for optimal sound quality. This allows the analog circuits to reach thermal equilibrium and the optimal temperature range for the current bias points we've chosen. In my experience, one of the Great Laws of Audio is: Good sounding gear gets warm; bad sounding gear doesn't. -Joe |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Head of Bumping Security (B.S) Joined: Feb 2004 Location: in the hills of Southern California
Posts: 2,944
|
Sorry to hijack this topic for a minute. Hey Joe, I replied to your post on the UA 2192 thread in High End. It may be on page 3 by now. Anyway, thanks for posting.
|
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 421
| Quote:
That would be a good rule Joe, if it weren't for the fact that I can think of a good 5 million exceptions to it. In MY experience, any sort of attempted generalization (which is something that humans love to do to keep their minds working in a nice orderly fashion) should always be taken as false. Including this one. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PART 2:Must have "MICS"under 1k pr? Favorite "Sleeper" "ROOM" Mics? "Out of the Norm" | betsy | Low End Theory | 41 | 6th July 2009 08:15 PM |
| Does a DAC need to "burn in"? | Kevin Stone | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 31st March 2006 06:22 AM |
| New "Burn out Fade" Mix | bcgood | Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs | 25 | 6th December 2005 09:31 PM |
| The Deal/Reverb on Sheryl Crow's "Crash and Burn" | o--- | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 3rd June 2005 12:13 AM |
| cheap |"high-end" panasonic converters | hollywood_steve | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 21 | 23rd April 2003 03:09 PM |
| |