Phase question - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Phase question

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th December 2002   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Toluca Lake, CA
Posts: 1,263

Thread Starter
Phase question

I'm pre-mixing a song for an artist in England and, I couldn't get my 2 channel stereo strings to sound as wide as I wanted them to. After pressing the phase button on one of the two channels, I noticed a major difference in width.

I understand there's a cancellation of sound if I switch the mix to mono, but does everyone do this to get a wider spread on a particular sound?

Thanks in advance.
Imagine
Dean Landon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2002   #2
Lives for gear
 
NathanEldred's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast Central Florida
Posts: 7,242

Send a message via AIM to NathanEldred
How many people are going to listen to this song in mono? And of the ones that do hear it in mono, do they really care about hi-fidelity sound?
__________________
Nathan Eldred
Visit Atlas Pro Audio
NathanEldred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2002   #3
Lives for gear
 
e-cue's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 4,069

Re: Phase question

Quote:
Originally posted by Imagine
I'm pre-mixing a song for an artist in England and, I couldn't get my 2 channel stereo strings to sound as wide as I wanted them to. After pressing the phase button on one of the two channels, I noticed a major difference in width.

I understand there's a cancellation of sound if I switch the mix to mono, but does everyone do this to get a wider spread on a particular sound?

Thanks in advance.
Imagine
Basically you are fliiping your strings out of phase? Yuck. That would make my brain melt.
I usually use my Edison, or the Desper Spatializer plug in for "space". These translate better to mono sources. If you don't have access to a spatializer, put a delay on one channel with 0 feedback, and start at 0 ms, and sweep back to like 20 ms. Basically you'll be going of out phase, but in a much more controlled way. Always check this in MONO unless you want your strings non-existant when your song is played in a mono enviroment.
e-cue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2002   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Toluca Lake, CA
Posts: 1,263

Thread Starter
Nathan & e-cue,

When an instrument is out of phase, what's it doing exactly?

Thx
Dean Landon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2002   #5
Lives for gear
 
jazzius's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Amsterdam.....The Netherlands
Posts: 593

imagine that you're sitting in front of a pair of speakers...

...you can see the cones moving very slowly...first towards you, then away from you....both speakers at the same time and in sync......you would say the left and right channels are "in phase"..

......now imagine the same situation, but as one speaker cone moves towards you, the other is moving away from you....the left and right channels could now be said to be "out of phase".......

Phase can describe the relationship between 2 different channels, or also between 2 pieces of audio on the same channel (i guess this is where it gets confusing).....
jazzius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2002   #6
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,899


Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Right, and that's leading to a cancellation of frequencies which makes things sound thin and wonky.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.com
mooseaudio.bandcamp.com
Quote:
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th December 2002   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Toluca Lake, CA
Posts: 1,263

Thread Starter
Thanks jazzius, I appreciate it.

Imagine
Dean Landon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th December 2002   #8
urumita
 
7rojo7's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Spoleto, Italy
Posts: 2,381

If your strings are 2 tracks from a mix of different mics. or from an expander, chances are they don't contain exactly the same information. Total cancellation is improbable. It'll still sound bad in mono
However, for audio purposes, we face 2 forms of out of phase: inverted phase (phase invert switch, 2 mics pointed at one another), which is non time dependent and a time dependent relationship between identical signals (delays, close mic-far mic).
Inverse phase has a discrete value, theoretically the two components are 180° from each other, the other has varying degrees of "play". There are a lot of factors involved in phase relationships between signals: EQ and volume being important ones.
The imagining speakers description is very helpful, I also have this one:
draw a sine wave with its positive and negative excursions on a piece of solid paper, take a piece of tracing paper and trace this design onto it.
Inverse phase: flip the piece of tracing paper so the two designs together look like the DNA
Time dependent phase: move the tracing paper design horizontally along the base line of the other design and you will see that you can simulate inverse phase but realize that they're two completely different animals.
this being said, try this:
pan your original tracks @ 10 and 2 O'clock, crossfeed these into two delays (L>R, R>L) set the delays however you want and pan these @ 9 and 3 O'clock, crossfeed these into a real stereo reverb (L&R inputs) pan the reverb Hard. Play with this setup and check it in mono mostly for power differences
__________________
love and light
7rojo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th December 2002   #9
Lives for gear
 
e-cue's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 4,069

Quote:
Originally posted by 7rojo7
Inverse phase: flip the piece of tracing paper so the two designs together look like the DNA
Man, great wording. I always have to draw a picture to explain this. "DNA"
e-cue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th December 2002   #10
Lives for gear
 
Geosync's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 893

It's interesting that phase should come up as I am writing a little blurb about it and a cool little tool inside the KSP8 that not only checks it but allows you to adjust it digitally in .2 sample increments. It's been hiding inside our FX since the KDFX for our keyboards and it was only recently brought to my attention by our
soundware manager. We used it to debug the upcoming mLAN option.

Now that I can monitor digital phase, I will be able to measure and correct the slop from poorly written plug-ins as well as analog gear. It's the time dependent phase that kills the space and clarity of the stereo field and sends guys rushing for the multi-band compressors when the problem may be subtle phase issues.
__________________
George Hamilton
Pro Audio Professional
Geosync is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
please help with phase on drums ramjet So much gear, so little time! 30 14th June 2007 02:53 PM
Drum phase question TML So much gear, so little time! 5 6th February 2005 06:49 PM
eq phase question genericperson Geekslutz forum 8 18th April 2004 03:50 PM
Bass session (w/.aif). Line + Amp phase question Jens So much gear, so little time! 4 19th February 2004 09:22 PM
Newbie Phase Question.... BobbyPeru Geekslutz forum 6 16th January 2004 02:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.