Angle in an XY OH setup - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Angle in an XY OH setup

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th May 2008   #1
Locked away
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 908

Thread Starter
Angle in an XY OH setup

Hi everybody!

I'm going to record a band in town in their practice room for a demo.
Since it is a very small room with low ceiling. I think I'll go for a XY setup for drum OHs.
When it comes to angles I will try to experiment a bit.
The original angle between the two mics is 90°.
What are typical situations in which you would want to change the angle. Wider or smaller. Or is there a technical reason, why I should stick to 90°?

Another thought is to use recorderman for OH. But I don't like the stereo spread. I'll close mic every drum. So the OHs will be mostly for cymbals and a little ambience.

thanks for your comments.
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #2
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234



90 deg is a bit narrow for cardioids. But there are no hard and fast rules....




-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #3
Locked away
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 908

Thread Starter
Alright. No technical reason. Do whatever sounds good.
thanks
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #4
Gear nut
 
AmplitudeAudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, NC
Posts: 135

I was taught 120° if using a cardioid pattern. Works great for me.
AmplitudeAudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 6,312

Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
Since you're thinking of the OHs as cymbals/ambience mics, the way I set up XY overheads may not work for you, but I'll offer it up anyway:

- I start with whatever angle aims each mic at the spot my gut tells me is best
- I bring up the gain on the OHs preamp, then flip the polarity on one, adjusting the gain until the snare disappears
- I flip the polarity back, and check out the imaging. If there are any issues, I change the angle of the mics relative to one another, or I change where the pair are pointed
- I repeat these steps till I'm happy

I personally never have great luck setting up OHs for just cymbals and ambience. The better the image and balance of the kit in the OHs, the more natural the close mics sound. I often find that the greater the percentage of drum sound is coming from the OHs, the better the overall result. As usual, YMMV.
bgrotto is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #6
Locked away
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 908

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgrotto View Post
I personally never have great luck setting up OHs for just cymbals and ambience. The better the image and balance of the kit in the OHs, the more natural the close mics sound. I often find that the greater the percentage of drum sound is coming from the OHs, the better the overall result. As usual, YMMV.
Thanks a lot. I also tend to use the overheads for an overall picture of the whole kit. Most of the time I use an A/B setup. However, this is going to be a very fast session, they do not have the money to pay for the time needed for the perfect mic positioning. So I'll go for just cymbals to minimize phase issues. I'm not expecting the drums to sound really good. My desicion is more of a work around here.
And the drummer is an evil cymbal smashing bastard . So if I rely on OHs for the whole kit it's most likely going to end up with to much hi-end.

I'm not looking forward to that session. But I'll end up having 300 bucks more in my pocket. For 7 songs!!
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
DCtoDaylight's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 603

Read this...

....it will help you!

http://www.microphone-data.com/pdfs/Stereo%20zoom.pdf
DCtoDaylight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #8
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunale View Post
.

I'm not looking forward to that session. But I'll end up having 300 bucks more in my pocket. For 7 songs!!


Wow, I should send my bands over to you for demos....




-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2008   #9
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,551

35 degrees.
MarkRB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #10
Locked away
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 908

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkRB View Post
35 degrees.
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #11
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,258

Try ORTF while you're at it...you only have to separate the mics by 7" and start with a 110 degree angle. I greatly prefer this sound to XY for drum overheads but it's a personal choice.

I start with 110 degrees and work around from there to optimize it per kit.

War
__________________
Warren Dent, Owner - ZenPro Audio: Gear Now & Zen

warhead is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #12
Locked away
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 908

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by warhead View Post
Try ORTF while you're at it...you only have to separate the mics by 7" and start with a 110 degree angle. I greatly prefer this sound to XY for drum overheads but it's a personal choice.

I start with 110 degrees and work around from there to optimize it per kit.

War
Isn't that going to get too much phase smearing? It'll be a small untreated room.
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #13
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234



Your head is about that wide, and your ears don't have issues with this...

At 7" distance you will get comb filtering if you sum to mono. If you put the pair a few feet in front of the kit, you won't even get much of that.



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2008   #14
Locked away
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 908

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by tINY View Post


Your head is about that wide, and your ears don't have issues with this...

At 7" distance you will get comb filtering if you sum to mono. If you put the pair a few feet in front of the kit, you won't even get much of that.



-tINY

Ok. I'll take the time to experiment with that. I think I'll try to get it to sound as good as possible. even for 300 bucks. I have such a big heart.

tINY, you're really cool. Your posts almost always show that you're always trying to be very helpful. Thanks for that.
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,685

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunale View Post
Hi everybody!

Another thought is to use recorderman for OH. But I don't like the stereo spread. I'll close mic every drum. So the OHs will be mostly for cymbals and a little ambience.

thanks for your comments.
Personally I default to "recordermans" (and by that I assume you DON'T mean the technique commonly associated with Glyn Johns) if I'm in a crappy room. I prefer SDC's in this situation and also mic the snare, kick, and toms (although I rarely need the tom mics).

I have a feeling though that you are referring to the Glyn Johns technique because some people have a problem with thge stereo image - recordermans OTOH has a brilliant image IMO.
kats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2008   #16
Locked away
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 908

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by kats View Post
Personally I default to "recordermans" (and by that I assume you DON'T mean the technique commonly associated with Glyn Johns) if I'm in a crappy room. I prefer SDC's in this situation and also mic the snare, kick, and toms (although I rarely need the tom mics).

I have a feeling though that you are referring to the Glyn Johns technique because some people have a problem with thge stereo image - recordermans OTOH has a brilliant image IMO.
I don't like the image of both of the setups. Glyn Johns I find actually worse. And the main problem with recorderman is IMO, that often drummers/bands feel uncomfortable with it because it looks so weird to them. Even if it hides the acoustics of a crappy room to some extend, I want the drummer to feel as comfortable as possible.
It's a punk rock style band with fast drums, so I also fear the drummer could kill the "snare OH mic". stike
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monitor placement/angle/ differences? Todd So much gear, so little time! 12 26th April 2008 03:41 PM
Angle walls? Old Goat Studio building / acoustics 7 4th March 2008 09:41 PM
Why angle nearfield monitors? hduncan So much gear, so little time! 47 26th February 2008 11:18 PM
Here's a new business angle samwinston123 So much gear, so little time! 2 2nd November 2007 02:45 AM
Cutting tape, what angle? Jay Kahrs High end 13 13th May 2003 02:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.