finishing the mix in PTHD vs PTLE - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

finishing the mix in PTHD vs PTLE
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th April 2008   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: belgium
Posts: 71

Thread Starter
finishing the mix in PTHD vs PTLE

hi guys,

i am currently finishing the mix of my own bands full album.
i am doing this in PTLE.
there is a studio nearby who has a full blown HD system.
i was thinking of renting the place for a day (or two) to bounce the final mixes.
i assume that should sound better than bouncing in my own LE system????

another plus is that they also have a decent hardware comp (Gyraf SSLbus clone),
so i can replace the plugin (CT4 or RenComp) on my masterbus by the real thing.
and, last but not least, i can do some last tweaks in their better control room/speaker system.

what are your thoughts on this?

thanks,

arjan
arjan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
dhiltonlittle's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,718

if you have the money, i'd rent out the hd system. i've done and have heard some great mixes on le but you have to do alot of workarounds. how many tracks are in the session? do you have the music production toolkit? the main thing that comes into the picture is the delay compensation in hd. you're going to have to manually compensate for the delay in le which really adds up with sessions involving lots of tracks with lots of plugins.
__________________
DL
dhiltonlittle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
dhiltonlittle's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,718

oh yeah, and most importantly i'm assuming they are going to have an excellent monitoring environment in a treated room. that is worth the cash alone for the mix if you don't have treatment in your room.
dhiltonlittle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,698

48 Bit Mixer in HD = more headroom Delay Compensation = tighter mixes
T_R_S is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 434

You've got the same 48 bit mixer in PT LE... it has been discussed many times, aren't you tired of saying the same old things?
frenkonio is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,057

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankreverbo View Post
You've got the same 48 bit mixer in PT LE... it has been discussed many times, aren't you tired of saying the same old things?
Not true ProTools LE is 23bit floating point and HD is 48bit fixed
redroom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
stagefright13's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,250

I would rent the room. But would tweak the mix there. The Gssl rules as a buss compressor but I think Masseys software limiter sounds better on the 2 buss. The Gssl sounds better on drums IMHO. At least mine does. Buss your drum subgroup thru the gssl and use something else on the 2 buss for the final. And I think whatever they have for converters will make a big difference. Not to mention a good monitoring environment.

You can set up the session in advance and quickly get it done. I like HD and used it many times. And will be my next purchase.

Go for it!
__________________
Stagefrightrecords.com
stagefright13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Miami, FL/Boston, MA
Posts: 1,017

Send a message via AIM to edcampos
I would finish the mixes on LE, bounce, etc. and rent the room for a day or two (however much you can afford) and tweak the mixes on that system and bounce everything a second time. Compare the two different mixes for each song and see what worked out best for you. I'm sure the system/monitoring will be superior at the professional studio, but your knowledge of your own room/monitoring, etc. might prove itself crucial. IOW, you might be surprised with the final result but I would still book the room even if strictly for comparison purposes. Good luck and have fun!

Ed
edcampos is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #9
Lives for gear
 
jamwerks's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,082

Quote:
Originally Posted by redroom View Post
Not true ProTools LE is 23bit floating point and HD is 48bit fixed
I think that you meant to say 32 bit floating point.
jamwerks is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
stagefright13's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,250

I think the biggest difference will be in the monitoring room and the convertors and what outboard they have honestly.

Hmm that alot of stuff! I would go. Have fun! Cause it will be.

stagefright13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #11
Lives for gear
 
Mr.HOLMES's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,372

Quote:
Originally Posted by redroom View Post
Not true ProTools LE is 23bit floating point and HD is 48bit fixed
I would love to see the speakers which can result 288 db of dynamic range?

The mix wont be any better because of PT HD and in my ears it is a big myth that you will get more punch or a much better conversion on PT-HD.
I have seen so many people swearing on their HD because the sound is so much better.... bla bla

But if you give them two files and they do not know which one was mixed on LE or HD they do not can tell any differences.

If you have 24 BITS it is 144 db dynamic range if this is not enough????

The only benefit you will have from renting is to listen to your mix in perfect acoustic conditions if you can be sure that they have a well treated mixing room. And maybe this will bring you to the point that you have to change your mix. my 2 cents
Mr.HOLMES is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th April 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
stagefright13's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,250

I have LE and use HD sometimes. HD is better. I will have it soon. August?

LE is great tho and produces a nice project. REAL nice.
stagefright13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2008   #13
Dan
Lives for gear
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,669

Send a message via AIM to Dan
It's a 48 bit mix/processing engine, and a 56 bit accumulator. It's a matter of precision, not dynamic range. i.e how many digits after the decimal point. Calculation bit depth shouldn't be confused with conversion bit depth.

I work in a studio for the creative tools there, and the listening environment. I don't think simply switching the mix engine and bus comp would change a mix much.

That being said, it would be good experience to hear for yourself the difference.
__________________
Stay classy, planet Earth.
Dan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
Mr.HOLMES's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,372

Let me say it in other words.
Today the DAW qualities are on a so high level that the differences are very subtle and sometimes, my impression, engineers are praying -->"Faith healing" for hearing a big difference.

I have worked with both too and came to the point that a native system is not bad too.
Mr.HOLMES is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
stagefright13's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,250

I used to use Logic and was in love but use Protools now. Will never go back ever. Flame me now just being honest. Logic has the best graphics easily. Protools makes money. And is so easy. Like I said flame me I have my Nomex jacket on.

I changed platforms converters etc switching to protools. They probably all sound the same. But I am happy here and will never use Logic again. I have the logic4 PC box sitting on my shelf laughing at me. With the dongle. Totally wasted $550 US. Loved Logic but I got screwed. No where near as easy as protools tho. Glad I was forced to switch.

Buy hardware it doesn't go out of style. You can give it to your kids. When you are 50. They will love it and use it. F##ck Logic. no support or upgrade for PC. and Protools is way better anyway.

I only bitch like twice a year. And this needed 1. And Logic AND Mac deserves a huge FU from me. That is why I stick to hardware. Your hardware will always work. And so will Protools MAC or PC.
stagefright13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2008   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 2,313

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan View Post
It's a 48 bit mix/processing engine, and a 56 bit accumulator. It's a matter of precision, not dynamic range. i.e how many digits after the decimal point. Calculation bit depth shouldn't be confused with conversion bit depth.

I work in a studio for the creative tools there, and the listening environment. I don't think simply switching the mix engine and bus comp would change a mix much.

That being said, it would be good experience to hear for yourself the difference.
Could you define what you mean by "calculation depth." . .This is a new
term for me.

jeff
jmarkham is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2008   #17
Gear nut
 
Me_Likey's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 148

Quote:
Originally Posted by stagefright13 View Post
Buy hardware it doesn't go out of style. You can give it to your kids. When you are 50. They will love it and use it.
I thought that with my ADATs, Pro Tools Mix rig and finally my PCI HD rig. It ALL goes obsolete at some point. It's like saying my old Mac IIcx never went obsolete, which was the top of the line once. I made a lot of money with that computer, btw.

The only things you'll be able to hand down to your kids are microphones and guitars. Most of the rest will just be landfill.
Me_Likey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th April 2008   #18
Gear maniac
 
rockrev's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 287

Or . . . you could always give Reaper a shot . . . couldn't hurt.

[flame shields up]

dj
rockrev is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving Sessions from PTHD to PTLE Benmrx Music Computers 13 29th December 2007 07:52 AM
Hard time finishing this mix - thoughts please True North Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 8 12th January 2007 07:02 PM
PTLE vs. PTHD Nudging!!! amost So much gear, so little time! 6 14th July 2006 01:34 PM
PTHD/PTLE floating point thing? amost So much gear, so little time! 11 30th May 2006 01:51 PM
Nicely finishing levels on an iTunes based mix CD infiniteposse Low End Theory 3 19th November 2004 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.