meaty sounding mic for acoustics - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


meaty sounding mic for acoustics

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th March 2008   #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: WARSAW
Posts: 434

Thread Starter
meaty sounding mic for acoustics

Hi , making intensive tests with compressors i`m recording acustic guitars.
I use AT4060 and Oktavamod 319 which aren`t bad really but still i don`t have enough fat sound.I remember Groove tubes MD1b.I was very meaty , grainy and fat as pig mic.It had only one defect - disgusting chinese cheap ice pick and sizzle on high frequencies.
Extended top isn`t bad on acoustics but not cheap top.
I need fat , grainy sounding tube Large condenser for acoustc guitars.
Waiting for your advice.....
janek 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #2
Gear Guru
 
psycho_monkey's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 14,297

Send a message via Skype™ to psycho_monkey
Try a ribbon maybe...I love my coles 4038 for organic, rustic sort of sound.
psycho_monkey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 110

Quote:
I use AT4060
Huh? If this was a camera you could make Heidi Klum look fat with that thingy ...

Quote:
The fat sound starts with the instument being recorded
True.
Regarding positioning: are you sure you tried everything? The obvious, the questionable, the frowned upon and then some?

Maybe you are not looking for fat but a lo-mid bump?
Like the almighty U47?

Try AT4047 or Shure KSM32 if you are on a budget or any Neumann or Gefell you can get your hands across for the "will end it all“ solution.

Ribbons are cool if your pres can deliver.


Clarence
Clarence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
minus-sounds.com's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 505

Try the Octava ML-52 ribbon
minus-sounds.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
Pasta4lnch's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,326

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarence View Post
Huh? If this was a camera you could make Heidi Klum look fat with that thingy ...
LOL!


I like u-195's w/ the fat switch in, gets me a fairly meaty sound . . . I imagine ribbons will work too
__________________
myspace, youtube, facebook
Pasta4lnch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
lordwesley's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Plymouth UK
Posts: 1,209

Quote:
Originally Posted by moracspace View Post
The fat sound starts with the instument being recorded
I'm with this one. If there's no 'fat' in the instrument then no mic will pick it up.
lordwesley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
lakeshorephatty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,525

Assuming the poster has the correct instrument picked, i personally have found my cm7-gt with m7 capsule which is essentially a U47 clone to be the warmest without being plain old bloated guitar sound. I like that kind of sound so much i doubt i'll use any other mic on acoustics unless i have to.
lakeshorephatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
camus's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 912

SM58 with the windscreen screwed off.
camus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: WARSAW
Posts: 434

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeshorephatty View Post
Assuming the poster has the correct instrument picked, i personally have found my cm7-gt with m7 capsule which is essentially a U47 clone to be the warmest without being plain old bloated guitar sound. I like that kind of sound so much i doubt i'll use any other mic on acoustics unless i have to.
i knew that will be the best answer
of course CM7 is my target
but in the future....
now only fat , raw , grainy , primitive tube mic with easy to replacement tube (ex ecc83 or ecc81 - there are plenty of them and it is endless choice of differents tastes and colours....
what about Oktava tube?
janek 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Janek 68 -

What kind (brand and model) of guitar are you recording? Lets start with that and see what we're dealing with.

jb
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #11
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: WARSAW
Posts: 434

Thread Starter
U195- interesting - is it grainy?
Coles 4038 -? i have SE Ribbon .....ribbons aren`t grainy and they are slow....although i don`t know other ribbons except Royer 121 , CAD Trion and Oktava Ribbon...
AT4060 -isn`t bad but is hard sounding - it has very much upper mids and can handle high spl`s so isn`t soft , pillowy and meaty...just wide sounding.....
darker Groove tubes MD1b could make me happy...
janek 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520

The CAD VX2 with the OS-110 capsule is meaty (w/o the need for A1 sauce), and smooth on acoustic guitar.

[edit] I just noticed that you define meaty as "fat, grainy". Although I'm not sure I get what you're looking for, I retract my VX2 recommendation.
__________________

Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #13
Gear addict
 
Lunatique's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Fuzhou, China
Posts: 474

The guitar itself is crucial. You can use the fattest mic on the planet through the fattest tube preamp, but if your guitar is thin sounding (think Ovation), then it's not going to work. (But I guess most people recording ovations will DI it anyway.)
Lunatique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520

Quote:
Originally Posted by moracspace View Post
The fat sound starts with the instument being recorded
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordwesley View Post
I'm with this one. If there's no 'fat' in the instrument then no mic will pick it up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatique View Post
The guitar itself is crucial. You can use the fattest mic on the planet through the fattest tube preamp, but if your guitar is thin sounding (think Ovation), then it's not going to work. (But I guess most people recording ovations will DI it anyway.)
Come-on people: he's not asking how to make his guitar sound meaty, he asking for a meaty sounding LDC for his guitar.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
lordwesley's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Plymouth UK
Posts: 1,209

I know it comes down to preference for the player, but choice of pick on acoustic makes a pretty big difference. If possible experiment there. A choice of picks will be a lot cheaper than a choice of mics, and its very likely they'll make a bigger difference than changing a mic. If the pick's one of those acoustic paper thin things, the odds are against you.
It may not be the answer, but it might help.
lordwesley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #16
Gear Head
 
deneris's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 69

it's a bit pricey, but the josephson e22s is great for big, colored sounding acoustic tracks with heavy strumming, or for fingerpicking. Fire it right at the 12th fret about a foot away and you're golden.

Definitely fat, though it's an sdc if that matters.
deneris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,807

sometimes a true pressure omni can be the best solution for this kind of thing, since omni exhibit no proximity effect, and can give you a big solid bottom end. (and dont we all like big bottoms?)
__________________
jnorman
sunridge studios
salem, oregon
jnorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
RCM - Ronan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,414

I have an Ephiphone acoustic that looks cool and is fun too play but it always records flat and dull.... That is until I put a Pearlman LE on it. WOW!! It made the guitar sound huge. Nice big bottom with a forward high end that brought out the jangle.
__________________
Ronan Chris Murphy+ http://ronansrecordingshow.com

Six Day Recording Boot Camps in Los Angeles
July 16-21, 2012


RCM - Ronan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #19
Jai guru deva om
 
warhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 12,259

When I want a fat acoustic sound I always reach for my AEA R84. It ain't grainy though.

Does the guitar sound grainy in the room?

War
__________________
Warren Dent, Owner - ZenPro Audio: Gear Now & Zen

warhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #20
Gear addict
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: WARSAW
Posts: 434

Thread Starter
Thanks for all your advices.....
my guitar sounds ok by itself
FET LCD`s are wide sounding but not fat in organoleptic/musical sense .....in my opinion of course ....
tube mics are fat....
so : U195
CAD VX2
Pearlman LE.....
it`s good to know....
janek 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #21
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 141

Send a message via AIM to jaguarsg
u47 = meaty
jaguarsg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #22
TYY
Gear addict
 
TYY's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 406

Don't forget to play with a nylon pick. A thick one.
TYY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008   #23
Lives for gear
 
vernier's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,130

Still enjoying D19 on acoustic ...my drums and guitar fight over this little mic.
vernier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008   #24
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,357

people are going to disagree with me...but I suggest the SM7b without the windscreen in front of the sound hole for acoustic. Especially if you want it sounding "meaty" and for rock. I don't know if you'll get the "grainy" sound with it...you might want a u87ai for grainy.
heisleyamor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008   #25
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Blue Mountains-OZ
Posts: 153

Oktava 219

I recently heard a "before and after" recording of a Michael Joly modded Oktava 219 on acoustic guitar and I really liked the dimension and "meat" that it delivered.
I don't have one but it is on my list.
Mikey77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008   #26
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582

How about a Royer R121?

I second the recommendation to get your instrument in order--heavy guage strings, and a thick pick.

The Heil PR40 sounds pretty meaty when you jam it up close to the upper bout of the guitar.

Brad
__________________
plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com

Little Red Wagon Studios
How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW:
http://youtu.be/bswx5zrFRl0
http://youtu.be/W-II32AvVd8
Brad McGowan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2008   #27
Gear maniac
 
GoldenOne's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 201

Send a message via AIM to GoldenOne
What kind of guitar is it? If I want to make a thin or bright sounding guitar sound meaty I usually stick with ribbons, (I've used Fatheads and Royer 121s here) and usually end up placing them around a foot away from the soundhole. I bet the SM7b would work well but I haven't tried that. I always get such a meaty sound with that mic on kick and guitars that I bet it would work in this application as well.
__________________
Alex Chase
http://www.la-audio.com

FS: Audio Technica AT4050, Sennheiser MD421 x2, AKG D112, Sterling Audio ST44 x2, M Audio Project Mix
PM for details...

http://soundcloud.com/cityhawks/drifting-among-the-stars
GoldenOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2008   #28
Lives for gear
 
anguswoodhead's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: On the East Coast of Australia
Posts: 3,481

Send a message via Skype™ to anguswoodhead
To quote Daniel Lanois
"Acoustic guitar recordings are tough. If you can have a nice big mic further back from the instrument that's usually the best. Further back means no booming. Lately I've enjoyed a U47 or C37A with a 1066 preamp."
__________________


Woodhead Studios

WTB : pair (2) of DOA (not working) Neumann KM84 in any cosmetic condition

SSL Mix Box Analog Summing - $50 per song - convert your ITB 'digital' Mix to an SSL summed 'analog' mix.
Provide me with multiple stereo stems and I will send you back a final 'summed' mix.
The difference is amazing.


For Sale
TDM Plugins
BeesNeez Mahalia
anguswoodhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2008   #29
Lives for gear
 
vernier's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,130

Acoustic guitars crave tube limiters . . .

In my case, some of the fulth comes from a limiter.
vernier is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Large condenser mic for acoustics? lj Potyk High end 18 17th November 2007 03:02 PM
best sounding mic pre/converter combo? lucasmusic So much gear, so little time! 4 18th July 2007 02:05 AM
mic pre 1500 and unda for tracking vox-acoustics JPF High end 4 2nd April 2007 07:31 PM
New MXL mic with 2 different sounding capsules XHipHop Low End Theory 7 18th January 2006 01:46 PM
great sounding 8 ch mic pre boxes bjornson Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 30 18th March 2003 05:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.