If you think micamp quality is more important than mic quality... - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


If you think micamp quality is more important than mic quality...

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th March 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520

Thread Starter
If you think micamp quality is more important than mic quality...

...do you also feel that power amp quality is more important than monitor quality?

I'm just curious to see if people who believe the title feel it applies to the other end of the transduction chain as well.

Kind of like this
__________________

Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #2
Gear Guru
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 11,512



Who knows. But I do know that after owning NS10's and having them powered by high end Haflers for 10 years, I swapped out to Pacific Innovative mono block amps, and when the clients came back in, they thought I had re-tracked the drums. It made THAT much of a difference. Huge. Pity I couldn't keep them at 2k a channel.
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #3
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234


The two are intertwined.

I am convinced that more money spent on speakers gets you more improvement per dollar for a long time.

However, amps capable of driving the load that the speaker presents to them are needed.




-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520

Thread Starter
Yes, I'm a transducer person also...I just wanted to hear whether the adamant "amp" guys believe it on both ends.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
John Suitcase's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169

Well, clearly they are two sides of a coin. If the amp isn't operating in its linear range, the sound will be distorted, perhaps very badly. Similarly, if the monitor is not linear, the signal will be distorted. Either one will be a negative. On the other hand, if they're both operating within their linear range, the sound should be a good representation of the signal.

As far as Mics vs Preamps, I tend towards thinking they're both important, and both color the signal, though in different ways. Great mics through a Behrry mixer will sound pretty cloudy and 'cheap' (distorted in a in flattering way,) a recording done using bad or the wrong mics through a Neve will also sound bad.

It's a bit like asking whether the strings or the pickups are more important on an electric guitar. They are both very important, and looking at one without the other is silly.
John Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #6
Lives for gear
 
big country's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: (visiting) Lake Elsinor
Posts: 7,874

good power amps make a huge difference noboubt about it
good placement plays a big role too.
__________________
matt H.
think ... it will help with the stupid problems.


boom boom is not Rhythm

spinny mic tecnology
big country is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
vernier's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,130

If my McIntosh went on the blink, I'd call it a day.
vernier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Suitcase View Post
It's a bit like asking whether the strings or the pickups are more important on an electric guitar. They are both very important, and looking at one without the other is silly.
I hear you, but that's not what I'm asking.

Given a solid microphone, and a solid micamp there are two different thoughts on the upgrade path:
1. upgrade the amp next
2. upgrade the transducer next

I'm curious whether people in the first camp (upgrade the amp next) would follow the same upgrade path if the context were: "Given a solid power amp, and a solid set of monitors".
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #9
Lives for gear
 
mrbowes's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,452

Mic > Mic Pre
Amp > Speaker

The closer in the chain to the source, the more important.

stike
mrbowes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520

Thread Starter
Ooohhh...and MrBowes turns it on its head!


So, by extension you believe: D/A > Amp > Speaker
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #11
Gear addict
 
peeceebee's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 323

My opinion, the farther "up" the signal chain you go (CLOSER to the instrument/voice), the more signifigance changes become, in general.
I.E. change the sound at the source is most signifigant, change the mic second most, change the pre third most, etc.

Of course dramatic changes anywhere in the signal chain can change things bigtime...
peeceebee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #12
Gear Guru
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 11,512

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
Ooohhh...and MrBowes turns it on its head!


So, by extension you believe: D/A > Amp > Speaker

I'm not sure if you're just trolling for trouble or ???

Every link in the chain is important. You can't make a generalization about these things. If you're talking about a radio shack mic and a soundcraft pre, I'd say upgrade the mic first. If you're talking about a U87 and a soundcraft pre, I'd say upgrade the pre first. It's all relative. And that carries over to speakers/amps as well.

Mixers can adapt to the sonics and deficiencies of the most ugly sounding speakers if they want/need to. But putting a great power amp on that speaker will clean it up significantly. So........

The thread and your point is still moot in my mind.
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

A bad power amp can hiss and hum and distort and suck. These are "features" that are pretty much designed in and don't go away.

A bad speaker cabinet might rattle, but generally a speaker doesn't cause bad sound - it just reproduces it. Obviously they have different frequency ranges, a distinct EQ curve and tonality. And things like horns & piezo sound really crap, but I don't consider them "speakers".

So IMO, speakers - like microphones - have a wide range of tonality, and therefore make big differences in sound. But does that make them more important?

I value a great preamp more than a great microphone - because a preamp has the power to make all mics sound better, or to make all mics suck.

I value a great power amp more than great speakers, because it has the power to make all speakers better, or all speaker suck.

There are low cost mics and speakers that sound great with good amps. But IMO there are no low cost preamps and power amps that are any good.

Semantics really. They are completey different things, and both are necessary - otherwise you have no sound at all.
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
kurt's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 721

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwiburger View Post
A bad power amp can hiss and hum and distort and suck. These are "features" that are pretty much designed in and don't go away.

A bad speaker cabinet might rattle, but generally a speaker doesn't cause bad sound - it just reproduces it. Obviously they have different frequency ranges, a distinct EQ curve and tonality. And things like horns & piezo sound really crap, but I don't consider them "speakers".

So IMO, speakers - like microphones - have a wide range of tonality, and therefore make big differences in sound. But does that make them more important?

I value a great preamp more than a great microphone - because a preamp has the power to make all mics sound better, or to make all mics suck.

I value a great power amp more than great speakers, because it has the power to make all speakers better, or all speaker suck.

There are low cost mics and speakers that sound great with good amps. But IMO there are no low cost preamps and power amps that are any good.

Semantics really. They are completey different things, and both are necessary - otherwise you have no sound at all.
kurt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #15
Gear maniac
 
getreel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 188

It all depends on the mic and the preamp. I really great pre can make some of the less expensive chinese mics sound better, but a better mic will obviously sound way better with a better pre. or something...obviously. duh really.I'm sounding real dumb and redundant now...
getreel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #16
Lives for gear
 
amishsixstringe's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 1,268

Quote:
Originally Posted by getreel View Post
It all depends on the mic and the preamp. I really great pre can make some of the less expensive chinese mics sound better, but a better mic will obviously sound way better with a better pre. or something...obviously. duh really.I'm sounding real dumb and redundant now...

Actually, You're right. No preamp in the world can make one of those MXL sdc's sound great, just about any pre will still sound ok with a U47, and a 57 can sound really good or like shit depending on the pre. So, there's really no written laws here.

I would say that generally, the mic is more important, however.

Neil
__________________
My Recording Studio Build Thread: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/photo...hens-ohio.html

Photobucket Page with TONS more studio photos:
http://s152.photobucket.com/albums/s...ding%20Studio/

www.myspace.com/amishelectricchair
www.gcrecords.com
amishsixstringe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075

What's more important in a car - wheels or an engine?
Kiwiburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
Yetti's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago west suburbs, IL
Posts: 1,854

Ok, I'm in.
What you choose first would totally depend on what you are currently working with.

If I only have a few 57's and a Behringer mic pre, I spend the first dollars on a decent mic pre.
If I only have a few 57's and an "o.k." mic pre (Art, RNP, Joe Meek), I would spend the first dollars on a decent LDC mic.
__________________
Yetti-
Yetti is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #19
Lives for gear
 
Yetti's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago west suburbs, IL
Posts: 1,854

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwiburger View Post
What's more important in a car - wheels or an engine?
None of the above...
The car stereo is most important.
Yetti is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #20
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yetti View Post
None of the above...
The car stereo is most important.


I was thinking brakes....



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #21
Lives for gear
 
big country's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: (visiting) Lake Elsinor
Posts: 7,874

Quote:
Originally Posted by amishsixstringe View Post
Actually, You're right. No preamp in the world can make one of those MXL sdc's sound great, just about any pre will still sound ok with a U47, and a 57 can sound really good or like shit depending on the pre. So, there's really no written laws here.

I would say that generally, the mic is more important, however.

Neil
I have an SDC mxl that would rock some pretty big boats
big country is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008   #22
Lives for gear
 
Jimbo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,520

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwiburger View Post
I value a great preamp more than a great microphone - because a preamp has the power to make all mics sound better, or to make all mics suck.

I value a great power amp more than great speakers, because it has the power to make all speakers better, or all speaker suck.

There are low cost mics and speakers that sound great with good amps. But IMO there are no low cost preamps and power amps that are any good.
Thanks for your position on that.

Definitely a few points I hadn't considered. I'm still on the transducer end of things, but appreciate your perspective.
Jimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's more important, Quality or Quantity when it comes to being a Gearslutz? Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 42 13th August 2011 08:43 PM
a mic like the mxl v69 but of more quality ? eadgbe So much gear, so little time! 4 28th January 2008 04:12 PM
How important is audio quality? andychamp Downloads, the future - Q&A forum with expert guests from CD Baby, Tunecore and Nimbit 4 28th November 2007 05:32 AM
Is audio quality really that important? nobo So much gear, so little time! 41 4th August 2007 08:11 AM
Looking for top quality Mic preamps JoniMnemonic High end 10 6th May 2007 07:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.