Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th March 2008   #31
Moderator
 
James Lugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,713

Thread Starter
In a Blind test , on the ADAMs ,
The NO Compression pass was My Favorite,
had the most Feel to me...... anyway list is :

1 No Compression
2 MC77
2 Plug-in
3 2-1176


And there you have it.

When I bounced the no compression clip I was wondering if any one would say that. It sounded real good to me to.
James Lugo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008   #32
Lives for gear
 
Oldone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,090

2-1176 sounded like rock n roll. It had an edge. The others were muzak to my ears, too nice. The no compression was nice but the 1176 did it's crispy upper mid-range thing which just made it sound like a record.

Fun listen, thanks James.
Oldone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008   #33
Moderator
 
James Lugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,713

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by stagefright13 View Post

I think the biggest difference is the settings. The UA was more forward as vocals should be. Also an opinion. I don't think turning the knobs on either are equivalent. Different transformers etc. SO prolly not a great test. But I really like the Purple stuff. But I buy UA stuff also...

Yeah almost didn't need compression on the vocals. You sing like me wfo all the time. Kinda like a Marshall lol!
The MC77 has a different trip, when the attack time was fastest the MC77 clamped the peak transients quicker and harder then both the 2-1176 and the plug. The 2-1176 and the plug seemed to work very similar but the MC77 was very different. You hit the input half as much on the 77 to get the same reduction as the other 2 pieces.

100 watt stack.
James Lugo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008   #34
Gear Head
 
MacroMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Downtown, Ca
Posts: 39

Send a message via AIM to MacroMike
Hey James, thanks for putting this up. I was already planning to order a mc77 tomorrow. Although I liked the clip with the mc77 the most overall, I think the 2-1176 was pretty sweet too. It had a little some-in some-in extra to it. I feel it for the rock stuff. The plug was cool just not as in your face, more flat than the hardware.
MacroMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008   #35
Lives for gear
 
ImJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WA USA
Posts: 1,438

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aearth View Post
James you really got to stop swollowing those compressors.
Sounded cool, but that is what an experienced singer can do with or without gear. Dig your singing man.

nIC
+1! That's what I thought about the uncompressed track (thanks by the way!).
ImJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008   #36
Lives for gear
 
SoundUniverse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: seattle,wa
Posts: 513

Listening in headphones (Sony 7506) the 2-1176 had by far the most depth. The plug sounded pretty good, but I heard less dimension (funny, now I 'm reminded of the out of the box apeal) and the MC 77 had the color, but not quite the same broad dynamics as the 2-1176 to me.
SoundUniverse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008   #37
Lives for gear
 
stagefright13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,187

try 2:1 on the compressor! 8:1 is very hard. Try salt and pepper...
Compression on the voice especially yours should be more subtle.
And a real 1176 adds MOJO with no compression!

Your voice is kinda like a Marshall. Already compressed!
It's your choice but send me a wave! I love the style!

Your voice is already compressed! You may not need a compressor.
But you can still get some vibe from the fet's But I stand by the 2/1 one thing
It will work for you.
__________________
Stagefrightrecords.com
stagefright13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #38
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,525

Hey James,

Do you think you could email me the WAV file of the uncompressed clip? I'd love to run it through my DIY 1176 and post that result here as well. My email address is on my profile.

thanks,
Brad
__________________
plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com

Little Red Wagon Studios
How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bswx5...eature=channel
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #39
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 79

Forget the compression

I would rather have that vocalist with no compression then most of the ones that walk through my door With a fairchild, 1176, LA2A, etc.

Performance first!

Nice Pipes!

Mark
MarkofLavender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008   #40
Lives for gear
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 587

i don't know i could not hear much difference ??it must be subtle..I think i'll just use my plugin and save the money
__________________
mikey
mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #41
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 355

Hey James great shootout. I was at the amp shootout that was amazing.

So you had the UAD 1176 as an insert right? Same settings as the UA 1176?

Personally using headphones not greatest quality. Will check out at home which might change things.

But 1176 and plugin are close enough for me to go wither way.
77 is 3rd too smooth for this vocal.

Will check at home though.

Shit.. I am thinking same some $$ and use different UAD compressors for vox.
keano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #42
Lives for gear
 
KRStudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,346

Also keep in mind 2-1176 sounds a little different from single 1176. A little different circuit. I have both and like both but they are different. Can't wait to get a 77 though.
KRStudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #43
Moderator
 
James Lugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,713

Thread Starter
I just got a Urei 1178, man that thing rocks!
James Lugo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2009   #44
Lives for gear
 
vibralux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825

I like the MC77 best - maybe cause its my favourite comp and I use it a lot. BTW - I have this beast for over two years now and I found that I am using it almost exclusively with one setting- slowest attack, fastest release and 1:12- is that legal? I use it mostly to squeeze vocs (i like a lot of breaths ) and to giva a snap to a snare. I feel a bit like an idiot not using its full potential Anyone else using it this way most of the time?
Peace
MArty
vibralux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2009   #45
Lives for gear
 
syra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 2,096

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRStudio View Post
Also keep in mind 2-1176 sounds a little different from single 1176. A little different circuit. I have both and like both but they are different. Can't wait to get a 77 though.
Yup. A 2-1176 is definitely NOT 2 UA1176. 2-1176 doesn't pump the same way. I was never a fan of it.
syra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2009   #46
Lives for gear
 
KRStudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,346

OH Marty, the 77 is like a wife or girlfriend. Sometimes gentle, sometimes beat it into submission, use it!
KRStudio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2009   #47
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 10

2-1176 sounds best to me
darrenmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2009   #48
Lives for gear
 
Bounce's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Caleefornya
Posts: 837

It would be cool to hear the BF 1176 plug in on this as well for comparison :-)
__________________
McKay Garner
Production-Mixing-Composition
San Francisco-Los Angeles-Anywhere
http://www.mckaygarner.com
Bounce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2009   #49
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: AZ USA
Posts: 181

1. 2-1176 (hands down)
2. Plug-in
3. MC77

Interesting how my preferences are different than anyone else. Listening chain: Laptop -> USB -> Lavry DA11 -> Jerry Harvey JH13 PRO
SoSueMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2009   #50
Lives for gear
 
ScumBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Fransisco , BayArea
Posts: 1,982

Thanks for posting this James , threads like this is why I like Gearslutz !


The 1176 had more grit and magic , I liked it the best .

1.1176
2:MC77
3.Plugin

The plugin sounded a little thinner , but still very usable . Hell I got mine for free so bang for the buck and being able to strap it across as many tracks as I want the plugin is pretty damn good .

To me the pluging has a more modern sound , it sounds like a modern record , the 1176 sounds old school and had that magic of classic record .
ScumBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2009   #51
Gear addict
 
ironbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: milky way, california
Posts: 424

is that Kevin DuBrow?
jk , cool comparison post tho.
ironbelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th December 2009   #52
Lives for gear
 
Ernest Buckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 1,535

Hey James, Love the style and your delivery. To me, the 1176 wins out. It has depth and it rounds out the bottom more than the 77. The plug definitely sounded shallow. The 77 was nice, maybe a little too clean for that genre.
__________________
ernestbuckley.com


The single from my next record, "Shes So Ready"


You don`t need any more gear, you need to re-write the chorus.
Ernest Buckley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2009   #53
Gear maniac
 
alvagoldbook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 191

I have to agree with some other posters here. the MC77 was my first pick. The plug in was my 2nd. The third the 1176. I was quite surprised by how well the plug did.

the 1176 just sounded a bit flat and dead. The plug sounded quite nice. The MC77 had a lot of character to it. It allowed the vocal to shine more.

Very slight differences. Hard to tell with an mp3, and harder to tell given the vocal style.
alvagoldbook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2009   #54
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,348

The MC77 just sounds too clean and bright. When I think of mojo, I don't think about brightness and clarity. I think about beautiful mids to mid-highs and of course the low end.
MikeyMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2009   #55
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dudley, UK
Posts: 172

Quote:
Originally Posted by vibralux View Post
I like the MC77 best - maybe cause its my favourite comp and I use it a lot. BTW - I have this beast for over two years now and I found that I am using it almost exclusively with one setting- slowest attack, fastest release and 1:12- is that legal? I use it mostly to squeeze vocs (i like a lot of breaths ) and to giva a snap to a snare. I feel a bit like an idiot not using its full potential Anyone else using it this way most of the time?
Peace
MArty
Yeah, almost a permanent setting for me on vocals. 12:1 , slow attack, fast release. Love it.
paul101 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2010   #56
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 73

James, thanks for posting those clips - very instructional.

1. 1176 - classic, full, more bottom end, more presence
2. MC77 - nice, a bit more modern edge
3. Plug - sounded thin, ITB in comparison

Nice 'cultered hollering'
musical, with balls, and lungs to spare!
jahndhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2011   #57
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taipei/NewYork/Toronto
Posts: 824

1176 sound best

i love the 1176 from this test the best
I don't get why others hate it.
1176 clear to be able to zoom in the vocal the best with low volume.
This is very handy for mixing.
Because this will be able to save up headroom for other instrument to go louder without muddy the vocal.
This is why CLA always able to have his music sounds big and loud but still maintains that "clear, preference and details" vocal.
I don't need a compressor to "mask" my vocal track and i can simple do that by singing off-axis on microphone or EQ it.
So whatever can get me this kind of BIG and forward surely is the best compressor to me and the result is 1176 in this test.
jcc449 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neverending debate on 1176 LN vs. MC77 heksu High end 78 30th October 2011 12:30 AM
Why is the MC77 more versatile than the 1176? TapeOp So much gear, so little time! 15 9th April 2008 05:56 AM
MC77/1176 vs TG1 S75 High end 5 31st July 2007 03:38 AM
original 1176 vs MC77 vs 1176LN saikit_2003 High end 4 19th March 2007 09:33 AM
Is Purple Audio MC77 really BETTER '1176' than re-issue UA 1176 LN ? GYang So much gear, so little time! 1 12th February 2006 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.