![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,713
Thread Starter | In a Blind test , on the ADAMs , The NO Compression pass was My Favorite, had the most Feel to me...... anyway list is : 1 No Compression 2 MC77 2 Plug-in 3 2-1176 And there you have it. When I bounced the no compression clip I was wondering if any one would say that. It sounded real good to me to.
__________________ Vocal Asylum & Hemispheres Recording - http://www.sslmixingonline.com/ http://www.HemispheresRecording.com - http://www.youtube.com/user/jameslugo Now affiliated with Sound Pure Pro Audio & Guitars / Boutique Amps |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,090
| 2-1176 sounded like rock n roll. It had an edge. The others were muzak to my ears, too nice. The no compression was nice but the 1176 did it's crispy upper mid-range thing which just made it sound like a record. Fun listen, thanks James. |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,713
Thread Starter | Quote:
100 watt stack. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Gear Head | Hey James, thanks for putting this up. I was already planning to order a mc77 tomorrow. Although I liked the clip with the mc77 the most overall, I think the 2-1176 was pretty sweet too. |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: WA USA
Posts: 1,438
| |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: seattle,wa
Posts: 513
| Listening in headphones (Sony 7506) the 2-1176 had by far the most depth. The plug sounded pretty good, but I heard less dimension (funny, now I 'm reminded of the out of the box apeal) and the MC 77 had the color, but not quite the same broad dynamics as the 2-1176 to me.
__________________ www.myspace.com/justalittledynamite |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,187
| try 2:1 on the compressor! 8:1 is very hard. Try salt and pepper... Compression on the voice especially yours should be more subtle. And a real 1176 adds MOJO with no compression! Your voice is kinda like a Marshall. Already compressed! It's your choice but send me a wave! I love the style! Your voice is already compressed! You may not need a compressor. But you can still get some vibe from the fet's But I stand by the 2/1 one thing It will work for you.
__________________ Stagefrightrecords.com |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,525
| Hey James, Do you think you could email me the WAV file of the uncompressed clip? I'd love to run it through my DIY 1176 and post that result here as well. My email address is on my profile. thanks, Brad
__________________ plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com Little Red Wagon Studios How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bswx5...eature=channel |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 79
| Forget the compression I would rather have that vocalist with no compression then most of the ones that walk through my door With a fairchild, 1176, LA2A, etc. Performance first! Nice Pipes! Mark |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 587
| i don't know i could not hear much difference ??it must be subtle..I think i'll just use my plugin and save the money ![]()
__________________ mikey |
| | |
| | #41 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 355
| Hey James great shootout. I was at the amp shootout that was amazing. So you had the UAD 1176 as an insert right? Same settings as the UA 1176? Personally using headphones not greatest quality. Will check out at home which might change things. But 1176 and plugin are close enough for me to go wither way. 77 is 3rd too smooth for this vocal. Will check at home though. Shit.. I am thinking same some $$ and use different UAD compressors for vox. |
| | |
| | #42 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,346
| Also keep in mind 2-1176 sounds a little different from single 1176. A little different circuit. I have both and like both but they are different. Can't wait to get a 77 though. |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,713
Thread Starter | I just got a Urei 1178, man that thing rocks! |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
| I like the MC77 best - maybe cause its my favourite comp and I use it a lot. BTW - I have this beast for over two years now and I found that I am using it almost exclusively with one setting- slowest attack, fastest release and 1:12- is that legal? I use it mostly to squeeze vocs (i like a lot of breaths ) and to giva a snap to a snare. I feel a bit like an idiot not using its full potential Anyone else using it this way most of the time?Peace MArty |
| | |
| | #45 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: L.A.
Posts: 2,096
| Yup. A 2-1176 is definitely NOT 2 UA1176. 2-1176 doesn't pump the same way. I was never a fan of it. |
| | |
| | #46 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,346
| OH Marty, the 77 is like a wife or girlfriend. Sometimes gentle, sometimes beat it into submission, use it! ![]() |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Australia
Posts: 10
| 2-1176 sounds best to me |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Caleefornya
Posts: 837
| It would be cool to hear the BF 1176 plug in on this as well for comparison :-)
__________________ McKay Garner Production-Mixing-Composition San Francisco-Los Angeles-Anywhere http://www.mckaygarner.com |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: AZ USA
Posts: 181
| 1. 2-1176 (hands down) 2. Plug-in 3. MC77 Interesting how my preferences are different than anyone else. Listening chain: Laptop -> USB -> Lavry DA11 -> Jerry Harvey JH13 PRO |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: San Fransisco , BayArea
Posts: 1,982
| Thanks for posting this James , threads like this is why I like Gearslutz ! The 1176 had more grit and magic , I liked it the best . 1.1176 2:MC77 3.Plugin The plugin sounded a little thinner , but still very usable . Hell I got mine for free so bang for the buck and being able to strap it across as many tracks as I want the plugin is pretty damn good . To me the pluging has a more modern sound , it sounds like a modern record , the 1176 sounds old school and had that magic of classic record . |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: milky way, california
Posts: 424
| is that Kevin DuBrow? jk |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Lives for gear | Hey James, Love the style and your delivery. To me, the 1176 wins out. It has depth and it rounds out the bottom more than the 77. The plug definitely sounded shallow. The 77 was nice, maybe a little too clean for that genre.
__________________ ernestbuckley.com The single from my next record, "Shes So Ready" You don`t need any more gear, you need to re-write the chorus. |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 191
| I have to agree with some other posters here. the MC77 was my first pick. The plug in was my 2nd. The third the 1176. I was quite surprised by how well the plug did. the 1176 just sounded a bit flat and dead. The plug sounded quite nice. The MC77 had a lot of character to it. It allowed the vocal to shine more. Very slight differences. Hard to tell with an mp3, and harder to tell given the vocal style. |
| | |
| | #54 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,348
| The MC77 just sounds too clean and bright. When I think of mojo, I don't think about brightness and clarity. I think about beautiful mids to mid-highs and of course the low end. |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Dudley, UK
Posts: 172
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 73
| James, thanks for posting those clips - very instructional. 1. 1176 - classic, full, more bottom end, more presence 2. MC77 - nice, a bit more modern edge 3. Plug - sounded thin, ITB in comparison Nice 'cultered hollering' ![]() musical, with balls, and lungs to spare! |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Taipei/NewYork/Toronto
Posts: 824
| 1176 sound best i love the 1176 from this test the best I don't get why others hate it. 1176 clear to be able to zoom in the vocal the best with low volume. This is very handy for mixing. Because this will be able to save up headroom for other instrument to go louder without muddy the vocal. This is why CLA always able to have his music sounds big and loud but still maintains that "clear, preference and details" vocal. I don't need a compressor to "mask" my vocal track and i can simple do that by singing off-axis on microphone or EQ it. So whatever can get me this kind of BIG and forward surely is the best compressor to me and the result is 1176 in this test. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Neverending debate on 1176 LN vs. MC77 | heksu | High end | 78 | 30th October 2011 12:30 AM |
| Why is the MC77 more versatile than the 1176? | TapeOp | So much gear, so little time! | 15 | 9th April 2008 05:56 AM |
| MC77/1176 vs TG1 | S75 | High end | 5 | 31st July 2007 03:38 AM |
| original 1176 vs MC77 vs 1176LN | saikit_2003 | High end | 4 | 19th March 2007 09:33 AM |
| Is Purple Audio MC77 really BETTER '1176' than re-issue UA 1176 LN ? | GYang | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 12th February 2006 02:58 PM |
| |