![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Bern/Berlin
Posts: 439
Thread Starter | bright heavy guitars "out of the boxes" trick
how do you guys get the guitar widening to that thrice out of the boxes guitar sound? I tried with duy wide but above 25% of wideness it kinda starts to sound weird... any tricks around here? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2008 Location: Siberia, Vermont
Posts: 134
|
Double tracking, with the tracks panned hard left and right. You could also add a 3rd track in the center. There are a zillion permutations of this, depending on what you're shooting for. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
|
On all the Thrice records I have I clearly hear only a handful of guitar parts that are highpassed and panned hard right and hard left. The left and right sides are usually playing two distinct parts so that helps the separation. It's all about arrangement. Dual mono never sounds as big. Brad
__________________ plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com Little Red Wagon Studios How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW: http://youtu.be/bswx5zrFRl0 http://youtu.be/W-II32AvVd8 |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 3,188
|
Reamping really helps in the doubling process to really get them tight and huge... use subtly different amp settings / mics to get subtle differences in the tone so they will sound huge and not just louder.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
I'd say the answer is M/S Mastering...
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear | I think just fixing the mix in the first place is far more effective and safe than M/S mastering. If he's happy with his center, all it's going to do is weaken the center if the sides are brought up in mastering. There could be information on the sides too that shouldn't be brought up (cymbals, ride, hh, etc). IME it's only for extreme cases where the mix is done and mastering is the last step to 'fix it' (because as a mastering engineer, I highly recommend that if there is the possibility to remix and make it right it should be IMO). Just my two cents. To the original poster there are a lot of things you can try. Panning is a big part of the equation. I find the 'primary' distorted electrics work well at 9/3 o'clock or 10/2 o'clock on the panning. If you make the loudest double tracked guitars on the extreme left and right they will be wide but they feel like they are in outer space. For hard rock and metal, I like to use four mono tracks, or possible two takes with two mics per take. The 4 tracks will be panned 10/2 or 9/3 usually quite dry or just a little subtle delay, and the secondary tracks (which will hopefully be tracked with another amp or guitar, or these are the room mics) will be hard left and right with some possible tight ambience added. The hard panned guitars ban be automated up and down for effect, i.e. wider on chorus, tighter on verse, etc. There are a million things to try, just experiment. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 3,188
| Quote:
Good post! To sum it up : Use your ears! | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear |
One good trick is one I gleamed from the Slipperman guitar recording thread. The trick is to boost a high shelf ABOVE where you've set a low pass filter. For example, if you're using a 1084 (my guitar EQ of choice), low pass at 6k or 8k, and boost at 10k or 12k. It creates a really unique top end that eliminates the fizzy crap that lives at the top of dirt guitars, without dulling them severely. Cool stuff. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Bern/Berlin
Posts: 439
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,146
| Quote:
I love this trick. | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,501
| Quote:
Personally I find that the right mic and pre choices are important, then double track them panning at 9 and 3 o'clock. If you are lazy or pressed for time, then you can try copying the track and moving the copied track ahead or behind a bit. That works but not as well as a real double track. I also use 4 tracks with 4 takes sometimes. | |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Bern/Berlin
Posts: 439
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 274
| Quote:
__________________ _______________ Ryan Miller http://www.sq1studios.com http://www.myspace.com/squareonestudios | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Open/bright/crispy mic" vs. "Round/dark/mellow mic with high EQ boost" | Joemamma | So much gear, so little time! | 24 | 26th January 2011 09:23 PM |
| is the "plastic bag trick" the best way to "protect" mics in use? | perx | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 19th July 2007 05:14 PM |
| "Stray Dog Freedom" - Bright Eyes - Guitar Tone | brockf | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 15th May 2007 08:42 PM |
| Tracking guitars to DAW: What have you learned that made them go from "ok" to "WOW"? | guittarzzan | So much gear, so little time! | 47 | 22nd February 2007 06:11 AM |
| "onboard" patchbay - bright idea needed | hollywood_steve | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 15th November 2002 08:54 PM |
| |