Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th February 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
Kenny Gioia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,323

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Kenny Gioia
Vox Up - Vox Down Listening Test

Based on a thought from another thread, I decided to make a test to see how small of a volume difference we can all hear.

I have nothing to prove here. I'm just curious to see if we can all hear .5dB difference in a Vocal track level.

I chose a really dense song on purpose. Let's not discuss the material. Please.

I made a normal mix which is the control.

Then I made 4 other variations. Mix A, B, C, & D.

So there's a Vox up .5dB, Vox up 1dB, Vox down .5dB and a Vox down 1dB.

Let's see if we can guess which mix is what.

Download it here:

Kenny's Download Page

Thanks
__________________
It's a journey. Not a destination. Enjoy yours.

Kenny Gioia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #2
Gear addict
 
Dean7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 310

Well, I could hear a difference for sure, but it was pretty subtle so I might have completely messed things up. Here are my guesses:

Mix A - Vox down .5dB
Mix B - Vox up .5dB
Mix C - Vox up 1dB
Mix D - Vox down 1dB

-Dean
Dean7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #3
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,037

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Gioia View Post
So there's a Vox up .5dB, Vox up 1dB, Vox down .5dB and a Vox down 1dB.

i'm guessing B, C, D, A respectively. vocal down was harder for me.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________

Introducing UBK-1: Motion Generating Character Compressor



Finally... Plugin Compression with Vibe, Color, and Authority

____________________
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #4
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 328

A -.5
B +.5
C +1
D -1

That's listening on crappy earbuds hooked to my computer. I'll be suprised, but very interested, to learn that I'm wrong though.
dwall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #5
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 354

C +1
B +.5
A -.5
D -1
Brenton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #6
Gear addict
 
Mixerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 386

This wasn't even hard, and nearly everyone on this thread, so far, has it right.

Mix A down.5db
Mix B up .5db
Mix C up 1db
Mix D dwn 1db

The more dialed in your mix, the more obvious the difference will be. Obviously, .5 db seems subtle on the surface of things. But it makes a difference in how the track feels compared to the vocal. And when it's mastered, and limiting has been applied, it becomes an even bigger difference.

That said, if you're way out of the ballpark to where the vocal should sit, .5 db won't make a difference.

Out of the five mixes, I would recommend using the "Normal mix."

Enjoy,

Mixerman
Mixerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #7
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 278

My girlfriend couldn't notice a difference between any of the mixes....but she'd still buy the song
Andrew07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613

the issue is that some vp at a label can always hear a difference, even when it's not there
computa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #9
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 328

I believe I could pass this test with .2 vs. .5 differences (why not give it a try?), however, I will admit that there have been times when I have raised the volume on a track and gotten it "just right", only to realize that I was moving the wrong fader and was changing nothing in the mix. I could swear that I heard it changing, though.
dwall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
robot gigante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: out west
Posts: 3,864

Quote:
Originally Posted by computa View Post
the issue is that some vp at a label can always hear a difference, even when it's not there
ha ha ha- yep!
robot gigante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2008   #11
Lives for gear
 
MarkRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,500

Prefer Mix C myself. I don't like the compression much but that is by the by.

I really think vocal levels are personal. A & B for me are too quiet but they certainly don't qualify as bad mixes. Maybe Mixerman is right and the louder vocal tracks would piss me off after a while.

Thanks for your efforts Kenny, it's great that people can put their balls on the line here.
MarkRB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
dreamsongs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,542

I would choose B as my final mix and I will guess that's the .5 up one.

In the normal mix the guitars, bass and drums completely swallow the vocal and that can't be a good thing. I always like to hear at least something of what's being sung. That's why I prefer the vocal up slightly. But that's just my humble opinion...

I heard it thru my pc speakers which are pretty decent but it obviously would've been better thru the monitors.,

As I heard it, I would say B,C,A,D in that order.
__________________
Dreamsongs BMI
Dreamsongs Productions
Dreamsongs Publishing BMI
Dreamsongs LLC

" The dream don't come any closer on it's own, you have to go after it " Me...!
dreamsongs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2008   #13
Lives for gear
 
Kenny Gioia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,323

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to Kenny Gioia
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwall View Post
I believe I could pass this test with .2 vs. .5 differences (why not give it a try?), however, I will admit that there have been times when I have raised the volume on a track and gotten it "just right", only to realize that I was moving the wrong fader and was changing nothing in the mix. I could swear that I heard it changing, though.
I might consider trying that.

Maybe this time I'll throw in a curve. Like one of the mixes will just be the normal mix.

I have been fooled many times by grabbing the wrong fader or EQ.

I purposely chose a crushed mix BTW.
Kenny Gioia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2008   #14
Gear addict
 
Mixerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 386

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Gioia View Post
I might consider trying that.

Maybe this time I'll throw in a curve. Like one of the mixes will just be the normal mix.

I have been fooled many times by grabbing the wrong fader or EQ.

I purposely chose a crushed mix BTW.
Personally, I didn't assume that you didn't thrown in a second normal mix anyway.

Enjoy,

Mixerman
Mixerman is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do you multi track hook vox with out being two chorusy.Listening samples included feedback711 Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 3 29th September 2007 10:01 PM
Mo' simple listening test this time RecTeach High end 5 30th May 2007 02:05 AM
A great blind compressor listening test! RecTeach High end 76 28th May 2007 04:32 PM
U87 vs ADK CE small listening test ISedlacek High end 21 10th June 2006 03:53 AM
The car listening test....I need a new rig. cajonezzz So much gear, so little time! 7 17th November 2003 09:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:58 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.