Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th February 2008   #1
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
The most expensive analog tape machine ever

I've read that the Ampex ATR-124 was the most expensive analog machine ever built. I've also read a few different numbers on how many were built, varying from 50 to 100.

Anyone recall how much $ they were?

Anyone know how many were built?

Just curious. Thanks...
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
PlatinumSamples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,686

These guys say 50:

The all-time great analog multitracks

I've seen about 15 in LA (Ocean Way & The Complex)... best machine I've ever used.

Rail
__________________
Platinum Samples
www.platinumsamples.com
Platinum Samples on Facebook
===========================
PlatinumSamples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #3
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
$$?
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
yeloocproducer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,731

Man. The best techs in LA (and probably the world) would steer you away from a 124... not sure if you are going to look for one now, but good luck keeping it running if you do...
yeloocproducer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2008   #5
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,638

I'm pretty sure it was more than 50. Motown in LA had at least four if not more.
Bob Olhsson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #6
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
Anyone out there having luck keeping one going?

Bob, do you remember them having major issues when you worked on them?
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
PlatinumSamples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,686

They worked perfectly at Ocean Way (and still do) when I worked there and at The Complex. Pretty easy to fix IMO.. the only difficult part to work on was the power supply, not because of anything except it's a beast to take the power supply apart.. but once apart easy to fix. The MDA's don't go down very often (if at all) - so taking the power supply apart is pretty unusual. Since the ATR-124 has 4 full alignments saved - there are 4 identical sets of components for the 4 setups on each card.. which IMO makes it easier to fix.

Be aware that some machines have high crosstalk record heads... if you're looking to buy one look for one with low crosstalk heads. The only downside to the machines is that they have a slow punch in time (109 msecs)... you'll have to get familiar with the feel of the machine. At Ocean Way the assistants always did all the punching when I worked there.

Rail
PlatinumSamples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #8
Lives for gear
 
yeloocproducer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,731

You may want to try to talk to Dave Hecht, as he maintained the ones at Cello. I do remember him saying that they need a lot of babying...
yeloocproducer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #9
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
Nice to hear something positive for a change. Some people seem to think they're a bitch. I already have an ATR-124 with a set of 16-track headstacks that I want to put on it. I'm still saving the scratch for cables/MRL/tech/etc, so I don't have it going yet. I do, however, have a tech here with experience working on them.

Will the 16-track headstacks alleviate the crosstalk issues?

What are MDA's?

Thanks...
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
PlatinumSamples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,686

I believe all the 16 track headstacks have the higher crosstalk... but they sound better (everything's a compromise).

MDA = Motor Drive Amplifier (transistors).

Where are you located?

Rail
PlatinumSamples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #11
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
The guy I bought the 16-track headstacks from said that crosstalk was only really a problem with overdubbing. Not so much if everything is tracked at once. Any truth to this? Thanks again...
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #12
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
Oh...I'm in Seattle.
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #13
Lives for gear
 
PlatinumSamples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,686

Quote:
Originally Posted by FW Harper View Post
The guy I bought the 16-track headstacks from said that crosstalk was only really a problem with overdubbing. Not so much if everything is tracked at once. Any truth to this? Thanks again...
That is exactly correct - but if you align with a full band MRL.. check your alignment procedure... It's been quite a few years since I had to do an alignment but I recall there being a different process for the 2 head types. I can email a friend and check for you.

Rail
PlatinumSamples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
vernier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,074

Don't know about expensive, but "best sounding" is Stephens.
vernier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #15
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlatinumSamples View Post
That is exactly correct - but if you align with a full band MRL.. check your alignment procedure... It's been quite a few years since I had to do an alignment but I recall there being a different process for the 2 head types. I can email a friend and check for you.

Rail
Good to know. I've yet to go through the service manual I have. I'll PM you if I have questions when I get to that point. Thanks for the offer.
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #16
Gear Head
 
FW Harper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 74

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by vernier View Post
Don't know about expensive, but "best sounding" is Stephens.
I do like the sound of Queen records!
FW Harper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #17
Motown legend
 
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,638

I never worked at Motown in LA. I moved to San Francisco and dropped out.
Bob Olhsson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,816

Quote:
Originally Posted by vernier View Post
Don't know about expensive, but "best sounding" is Stephens.
It's very subjective.

I've used both, along with every other 2" machine made.

ATR-124 ruled on the bottom end and just has a big, phat punchy sound without being muddy. Amazing sounding machine.

Stephens is probably the most open sounding 2" analog machine. Very transparent and neutral. Incredible for acoustic instruments and vocals.

But the ATR-124 is king of big, phat in-your-face, IMO. No other analog machine ever got close to it on the bottom end. Big, but tight.
__________________
Regards,
Brian T
BrianT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #19
Gear nut
 
"DB"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 76

Crosstalk

We had them at Regent in NYC, great sounding machine, and certainly not the nightmare to maintain that MCI's were, but the crosstalk between adjacent tracks when overdubbing is "0" (full) level at 15K., so be careful not to bounce between adjacent tracks. Only machine I've ever heard that sounded better was the Stephens.
__________________
"DB"
"DB" is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2008   #20
Lives for gear
 
PlatinumSamples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,686

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlatinumSamples
That is exactly correct - but if you align with a full band MRL.. check your alignment procedure... It's been quite a few years since I had to do an alignment but I recall there being a different process for the 2 head types. I can email a friend and check for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FW Harper View Post
Good to know. I've yet to go through the service manual I have. I'll PM you if I have questions when I get to that point. Thanks for the offer.
Here's the skinny from my friend:

Quote:
The only difference would be sync LF...the high x-talk would align the same as the repro head with 50Hz to 0VU,
whereas aligning the lo x-talk sync LF with 100Hz to +1VU would yield 50hz playback to ~ -2.5VU.
All record aspects remained the same.
Rail
PlatinumSamples is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #21
Gear maniac
 
wrekdahouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 281

Hello I have a Ampex ATR 124 for sale.

I didnt know that only that few machines were built !
we purchased it new. it is a beast!


http://www.gearslutz.com/board/gears...atr-124-a.html

regards,

Patricio
wrekdahouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,099

My old friend Tony Arnold had two ATR-124s sync'ed with 16 track heads on them back in the '80s.
When he was working in my studio here in Texas he played a few things he had done on them.... astounding stuff!

They were the same basic technology as the ATR series 102s and 104s.

I saw a non-working ATR-124 available on eBay or some place in the last six months.
Maybe it was in NY?
dbbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #23
Gear maniac
 
wrekdahouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 281

wow two of these beasts together with 16 track heads... !
i think you cant beat that

regards,
Patricio
wrekdahouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2009   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,099

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrekdahouse View Post
wow two of these beasts together with 16 track heads... !
i think you cant beat that

regards,
Patricio
Yeah and it was tied to either his Helios or his Raindirk console (consul as he calls it.)

He did that Fripp and Summers stuff on his ATR-124s.
I seem to recall that he said that record was done with just 24 tracks.
(Here I am recalling a conversation from 1977!!!!)

Tony is THE Ampex king in Europe!
dbbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advice on Tape machine-analog slutz! beruang High end 24 15th February 2007 10:50 PM
Small mixer for analog tape machine. wayne mox Low End Theory 5 3rd August 2006 02:36 PM
synching DP/Motu 2408 with an analog tape machine squelchpalace Music computers 2 12th December 2005 03:08 AM
analog tape machine alignment vtone So much gear, so little time! 1 1st January 2004 02:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.