LA3a Hardware vs UAD-1

Beyersound · 22nd February 2008, 05:45 AM

To continue the comparisons, how do you rate the plugin LA3a against the hardware version? Please feel free to share your general opinions of the LA3a and even your favorite uses for it. Thanks

baikonour · 22nd February 2008, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beyersound

To continue the comparisons, how do you rate the plugin LA3a against the hardware version? Please feel free to share your general opinions of the LA3a and even your favorite uses for it. Thanks

I haven't compared them but the UAD LA3A is now my "go to" compressor for electric bass.

Beyersound · 22nd February 2008, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baikonour

I haven't compared them but the UAD LA3A is now my "go to" compressor for electric bass.

My go to on bass also. Same on kick, just not as much squash.

Led · 22nd February 2008, 02:44 PM

I have a pair of original LA3A's that I mainly use for the electric guitar buss. I've got UAD cards, and the LA3A on there is good. It doesn't saturate the way the hardware does, and you get a bit more bite out of the hardware. The plugin is pretty good though. I've used it when one of mine was getting repaired. The LA3a is pretty good on a rock vocal too. One thing you can't do with the plugin that you can wiith the hardware is use it as a mic pre for a dynamic. Good on amps and sometimes on toms.

FatStudio · 19th May 2008, 07:40 AM

I have the hardware and the plug in.

They sound sort of close ,but the attack on the hardware has more punch.
I do like the plug for some stuff ,Its cleaner ,but the hardware has a lot more magic.

Before I had them side by side they did sound the same but in an A/B test you can definitely hear the deference .

Hardware-Bass ,Vocal ,cool Drum room pump.
Plug in - Piano ,vocal ,E.Guitar buss.

Mr.HOLMES · 19th May 2008, 01:29 PM

Maybe this helps too.
I have compared the 1176 with the Plug In.

Yes the hardware ads more grip I would say .... to the signal.
English is not my mother-language.

But I had the feeling that Plug Ins these days are so close to it that at this point different Questions such as costs more flexibility during the mix-down and no maintenance comes to mind....my 2 cents

Also I prefer mixing with Plugs aftrer I tried to do it with a desk.
I am to lazy to buy five 1176 even this would mean a total restore of my Studio.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
UAD-1 : La3a	Tone Laborer	Music computers	11	7th October 2007 07:20 AM
UAD 33609c vs hardware 33609j	baybud	High end	11	20th August 2007 01:11 AM
UA just released the UAD-1 Neve 88RS & LA3A	radiant	So much gear, so little time!	7	26th June 2007 08:59 AM
Testing a Vintage UREI LA3a & UA Reissue LA3a	ny152	High end	3	6th October 2006 05:25 PM
Hardware vs. UAD-1	SoSueMe	Music computers	1	11th March 2005 04:27 AM

22nd February 2008, 05:45 AM	#1
Beyersound Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vegas Posts: 860	LA3a Hardware vs UAD-1 To continue the comparisons, how do you rate the plugin LA3a against the hardware version? Please feel free to share your general opinions of the LA3a and even your favorite uses for it. Thanks __________________ Beyersound Protools is great for Corporate America, the rest of us want real choices!!!! ""Musicians should learn...the fundamentals, just like a baseball player. Run, hit, throw. And if you don't know that stuff, you'll never be a major leaguer. It's an old fashioned, cranky way of thinking, but I'm sorry, there's no easy way. You can go on American Idol and scream your head off, but if you can't play an axe, I'm not going to respect you." --Billy Joel www.myspace.com/beyeraudio

22nd February 2008, 02:44 PM	#4
Led Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 1,834	I have a pair of original LA3A's that I mainly use for the electric guitar buss. I've got UAD cards, and the LA3A on there is good. It doesn't saturate the way the hardware does, and you get a bit more bite out of the hardware. The plugin is pretty good though. I've used it when one of mine was getting repaired. The LA3a is pretty good on a rock vocal too. One thing you can't do with the plugin that you can wiith the hardware is use it as a mic pre for a dynamic. Good on amps and sometimes on toms. __________________ "My voice has a built in extortion box" - recent vocalist I recorded...

19th May 2008, 07:40 AM	#5
FatStudio Gear nut Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Israel Posts: 129	I have the hardware and the plug in. They sound sort of close ,but the attack on the hardware has more punch. I do like the plug for some stuff ,Its cleaner ,but the hardware has a lot more magic. Before I had them side by side they did sound the same but in an A/B test you can definitely hear the deference . Hardware-Bass ,Vocal ,cool Drum room pump. Plug in - Piano ,vocal ,E.Guitar buss. __________________ *********** Fat Studio* *************

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

19th May 2008, 01:29 PM	#6
Mr.HOLMES Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 1,481	Maybe this helps too. I have compared the 1176 with the Plug In. Yes the hardware ads more grip I would say .... to the signal. English is not my mother-language. But I had the feeling that Plug Ins these days are so close to it that at this point different Questions such as costs more flexibility during the mix-down and no maintenance comes to mind....my 2 cents Also I prefer mixing with Plugs aftrer I tried to do it with a desk. I am to lazy to buy five 1176 even this would mean a total restore of my Studio.