![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Thread Starter | Protools songs / session organisation
I need some tips to organise let's say a 10 song album session. How do you guys used to work ? A.Every song on a different session , each with his own audio, session backup and fades folder ? B.Or do you record all the songs on the same session ? When working in the B style, it is of course handy to use all eq settings etc on drum instruments for instance , you can jump from one song to another to do some overdubs, etc.. But I find it quickly becomes a mess with all the different files in the region binand in the audio folder and what if you want to change the tempo on one song, you all know that the whole grid changes on the other songs. I recently started to work in the A style. Much easier to manage the files and tempo changes. I start with a template that I like for song 1 , but when the session progresses, I add extra routings for headphone mixes, auxes for reverbs more tracks and other things that work for this particular song. Now up to song number 2. What to do ? starting again from the template ? But then I lose all the routings and auxes that I like for that Band? Or start from the previous song session and remove the files from the 1st song ? But then the audio files from all songs reamin in one folder. A lot of confusing here. Btw, I recently started using PT6 with the session import function: But I'm still not satisfied with importing new tracks and deleting old ones on the same session; unless I'm missing somethging here. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
You can use method A...highly highly....highly.....highly recommended that you do so. Having all the songs in the same session file is a nightmare for any other engineer working with that album. If your upset about having to redo your auxes and such make a template session for the band....then open the template session for each new song..then save as "song name".
__________________ _________________ "What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?" Randy Wright |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Thread Starter |
I got it Randy, but what if mixing time comes around and you found some nice eq settings for let's say the kick and snare on song 1. How to apply these settings to song 2 without having to save setting as " kick eq band x song" on the plugin or fiddle with the session import dialog and having to delete/ import tracks ? I |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 470
| Re: Protools songs / session organisation Quote:
Then, after the initial tracking, go through and save each keeper take segment to its own session. Minimize files, and only save what you need for that single song. Do your overdubs. Continue using style A until each song is finished. Bounce to stereo. Then, you take all your stereo mixes and import them into a single session. Do your editing, crossfades, level matching, and other premastering steps in a style B session ![]() Each style has its advantages and disadvantages. You can do everything one way, but sometimes it is quicker or less confusing to do it the other way on occasion. Just save it in a way that you can open the session a few weeks down the road and figure out without much thought just exactly what was going on and what needs to be done. Now, many DAWs allow you to copy and save mixer settings. And don't shy away from making temporary presets. You can delete them later. A couple extra keystrokes never killed anybody. You are still going to have to tweak eq and compression settings for each session to get them to sit right. | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Thread Starter |
Hm. I worked for years in style B; that is all songs one one big session. But recently I started to do a lot of editing on the tempo's with beatdetective etc. But once you start doing that, all markers start to move around wich makes it a complete mess. Not to speak about the huge audio folder PT creates and the time it takes to load the session. Therefore I want to get away from that and make a separate folder per song. Imagine you trash some files, well it can only hurts that particular song , right ? Just want to hear your opinions on how you handle the settings when jump from song to song in mixmode. With an "out the box" mixing desk, you always hve your latest settings no matter what song you load in. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2004 Location: United States of North-America
Posts: 135
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Moderator emeritus Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,152
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Motown legend Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,879
|
I vastly prefer one session file per song but there's nothing stopping you from importing the tracks from another song into the same session if you want. Another, more efficient strategy is creating a slave session for all your vocals which you can then import back into the original sessions. As for communication, a talkback mike in the studio that is always available on the console is pretty hard to beat.
__________________ Bob's room 615 562-4346 Georgetown Masters 615 254-3233 Music Industry 2.0 Interview |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Moderator emeritus Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,152
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear |
If you really want the same kick snare sound on every song for an album....then you can make one that sounds good and use sound replacer to replace the kick and snare on every song with the one that sounds good.... Personally..I like to treat each song as it's own......why would you want the kick and snare to sound the same on the whole album? That's boring. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632
|
When performing preliminary tracking, I prefer to create one session and "keep the tape rolling". Afterwards, I return to the session to divide the songs and create new sessions for each song. I like to keep everything very neat and meticulously organized in an attempt to interchange the sessions with other engineers at other facilities. This is my prefered method and for me to explain the stringent requirements involved I would occupy a couple of pages. That said, I have provided a link to the ProTools Session Interchange Guidlines established by the Grammy's Producer & Engineers Wing. Hopefully, this will provide some insight. http://www.grammy.com/pe_wing/ |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: LA
Posts: 1,456
| Re: Re: Protools songs / session organisation Quote:
I understand the spontaneous issue, but how long does it take to close a session,start a new one, and hit record? Even if you don't title it with the proper title, it should be pretty damn fast. cheers, John | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Why don't you want to save the settings? That's how I usually do it when I need to put the same settings on something else. | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 470
| Re: Re: Re: Protools songs / session organisation Quote:
And, a lot of work is all relative. Some people think walking 2 blocks to their local CVS/Walgreens is too much work, so they hop in the car to buy their ephedra. Those people will never believe you can walk there faster than they can drive, but it doesn't keep them from thinking they are saving time and being efficient. | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: LA
Posts: 1,456
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Protools songs / session organisation Quote:
As a work around for the title thing, I temporarily type in the time as the title, and note any relevant things that go on during the recording in that session as a reference. I guess I just have a thing about sitting in front of the computer any longer than I have to... Cheers, john | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 470
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Protools songs / session organisation Quote:
Note: I do hit stop alot, so i'm not dealing with a multitrack session of 3 hour long audio segments. Select audio segments, copy, create new session w/ file name, folder, and template type, paste, save, done. Repeat for the next keeper take. Honestly, it doesn't get much faster than that, although the work comes at the end of the session when everybody seems to want to go home. Do you clean your house up before you go on vacation, or when you get back? | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear |
it's starting to sound to me like someone's getting lazy...
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I Want to listen to songs recorded and mixed with ProTools 002R LE | Double Tones | Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs | 1 | 21st January 2006 06:46 AM |
| ProTools looping & session set up | FlatlineNYC | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 9 | 23rd November 2005 12:54 PM |
| trying to open a protools session from an external hardrive | Pointbreakd | Music computers | 2 | 26th August 2005 10:01 PM |
| Convert ProTools Session to Cubase? | eberrong | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 1st July 2004 08:06 PM |
| |