Live Monitoring Question - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Live Monitoring Question
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th February 2008   #1
Gear addict
 
IzzyRock's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 417

Thread Starter
Live Monitoring Question

Hello Folks,
This is actually a very noob question, since I'm a studio engineer.I've done many FOH sound but this is the first time I was asked to do dedicated monitoring (favor)

I was asked to do monitoring for a huge show (dedicated monitoring console).

My question is:
How are the channel inputs of the monitoring console being fed from?
- Are the channels being "fowarded" by the FOH console? (I'm getting all EQ and everything from each FOH channel, so same kick sound for both FOH and Monitors)
or
- Each signal was splitted just right after the microphones, so I'm getting everything "rough" and gotta EQ everything from stratch ?

I wanna make sure I know what im doing cause I aint asking that there tutt dfegad

Thanks!
__________________
www.estudiosbassino.cl
Producer/Mixing Engineer
IzzyRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #2
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 68

I do FOH and in large venues, there is usually a splitter snake that feeds FOH and monitor mixer. So the latter is probably the case, you get the mics directly into your console then can set gain, eq faders then matrix them out to each monitor mix. Usually you have a monitor wedge that you can listen to each mix on. Sounds fun! Does this band use IEMs?
BruPri is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #3
Gear addict
 
Jim Kerr's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 465

As you put - it every thing rough. The Channels are split between you and FOH and so-on unless there is something on the cheap but if it is a big gig then monitors are independently dedicated. You will have your own gain and EQ and you will probably send your channels to your monitors via AUX sends ie. Aux 1 = Drum fill, Aux 2 = SR mix, Aux 3 Center and so on. Have fun, its the only way to do it.
Jim Kerr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
jamsmith's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,028

You have a splitter. Sometimes its standalone, but usually it built into the monitor board. The stage mics get plugged into the monitor board and then back out to the snake to front of house. The mixes are completely independant. If they aren't using in-ear, I suggest if possible that you get the same wedge they have on stage and monitor off of that. You are then hearing what they are hearing. Its the toughest gig you will ever have; FOH is doing one mix and you are in charge of it. Monitors you are doing 3-8 mixes and each mix is under the demand the musicians, they are in charge.

The biggest challenge is to EQ all the channels and the mix them for each person on stage. If one guys want more beef on the kick, you have a problem. You have turn up the EQ on the kick and then probably turn the kick back down on the other mixes to compensate. You may get away with adjusting the graphic eq for that mix, but then you have feedback concerns - lord oh lord! Its a juggling act. Then you get the guy who can't be pleased and he is making faces and uncomprehensible hand signals all night. If FOH sucks, you most likely won't hear a thing about it even if 10,000 fans aren't happy with it. But one guy on stage who doesn't like what you did may tell you that you have ruined his whole career!

A pro tip: if they aren't prima donnas with "fidelity", pulling out every thing below 200 on the graphics will make the system go a lot farther. Foghat guys showed me that one. No rhyme or reason to any of it. I did Leon Russell once. He brought his own monitors, took me 2 minutes to get his bassist happy, then spent 45 minutes trying to please his Nigerian gourd player!
__________________
Screamin' Michael Jamsmith - www.jamsmith.com

"You CAN polish a turd, but you just end up with a shiny turd."
jamsmith is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #5
Gear addict
 
Jim Kerr's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 465

Quote:
Originally Posted by IzzyRock View Post
Hello Folks,
I wanna make sure I know what im doing cause I aint asking that there tutt dfegad

Thanks!
You should also have 31 band graphs inserted on each aux send (each mix). Generally they are for reducing a frequency prone to feedback.
Jim Kerr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #6
Gear addict
 
Jim Kerr's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 465

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamsmith View Post

A pro tip: if they aren't prima donnas with "fidelity", pulling out every thing below 200 on the graphics will make the system go a lot farther. Foghat guys showed me that one. No rhyme or reason to any of it. I did Leon Russell once. He brought his own monitors, took me 2 minutes to get his bassist happy, then spent 45 minutes trying to please his Nigerian gourd player!

Yup!


or
Shoot your self. ha, just kidding of course.

One important thing is that it will sound different when the house is on. Reminding the band of that helps. Like Jamsmith said you wont need anything below 200 on the graphs except for the drum fill. You'll have plenty of low end from FOH.
Jim Kerr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #7
Gear addict
 
IzzyRock's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 417

Thread Starter
Thanks a lot guys !!

One more question.
If im getting rough signals then. Do i have to do a "separate soundcheck" ? Cause I can't be sending a boxy kick drum to the guys, and most likely, the FOH engineer will have most of the time for "his" soundcheck.
How do you deal with each mic eq then without being a pain in the ass? Just mixing it while FOH soundcheck?
IzzyRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #8
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 8,533
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
normally you dont have time for this.

you make "your" stage soundcheck while the FOH guy is asking for kickdrum, snaredrum, bass..

you set the levels then. you really need to have a wedge in the back or at the side of you,so you can hear what the musicians hear.

you have to be superfast.. that is based on experience. so, you might **** it up the first time (I did **** it up 10 times or so).

cheers
__________________
Quote:
"recording engineers don't die, they are dragged into the grave by the shear weight of their balls."
Malcolm Chisholm
---------------------------------------------
www.georgenecola.com produce & mix itm/gear & fun
blog.georgenecola.com reviews & gear
soundcloud.com

twitter
George Necola is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #9
Gear addict
 
IzzyRock's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 417

Thread Starter
K. No prob I've done several FOH sound (even in the most painfull situations) so I think i got my speed skills done

I really dont kno if they are using IEMs, but I doubt it.

I'm done with the topic. However, if any of you want to share or give me any nice advice you are all welcome !! (Thanks for the 200khz one)


By the way, its for the opening act for Dream Theater concert (20k+ people )
IzzyRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #10
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 11,202



If you have sidefills available, use them for universal monitoring (like drums and bass).

Don't add anything that isn't specifically asked for - there will be a lot of bleed on stage anyway.

The pros are easy - they know what they want and can live with a real rough mix of everything else. It's the large regional bands who never had more than two channels that are the biggest pains in the a$$.

Welcome to hell...




-tINY

tINY is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008   #11
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 8,533
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
Quote:
Originally Posted by IzzyRock View Post
K. No prob I've done several FOH sound (even in the most painfull situations) so I think i got my speed skills done

I really dont kno if they are using IEMs, but I doubt it.

I'm done with the topic. However, if any of you want to share or give me any nice advice you are all welcome !! (Thanks for the 200khz one)


By the way, its for the opening act for Dream Theater concert (20k+ people )
I mixed a lot of openairs, FOH and stage.. and you won't believe me.. my PITA was the stagesound.. everytime.. 40k people maximum FOH, 9 people on stage.. the 9 people were maximum pain.. :D
George Necola is online now  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monitoring HD recorder live??? thedoner Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 25 29th December 2007 08:51 AM
Live: Own monitoring Submix for drums sergek Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 20th December 2007 08:23 PM
Monitoring live and practice sessions. imloggedin Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 0 9th November 2007 04:00 AM
Headphones/live room monitoring system question 6dyslexicelephnt Low End Theory 0 23rd May 2007 01:27 AM
Wireless monitoring for live performance. Rufuss Sewell Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 25th October 2006 02:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.