![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 146
Thread Starter | would this upgrade make sense?
i'm going to ramble a bit so please bear with me. i'm one of those home recording amateurs that ask stupid questions. i got into it because it has always interested in recording and i wanted to make demos for one of the bands i'm in. nothing fancy, but you know how the gearslut bug gets to you. three years, two records later i'm in a real studio with another band recording an ep. it's being done in protools and sound really good. the thing that is making me rethink my home studio is we recorded 16 tracks simultaneously and then overdubbed as much as we could simultaneously. seven songs, three days. at home i can do eight tracks at a time and now think this is limiting. here's my list of gear, what i'm thinking as to how to remedy this and please tell me if this will work or should i not bother. mci jh110 1" 8 track for basic tracks then dump into motu 828 mkII logic 6.41 powerbook g4 api pre's d&r console (chopped up 8 channel) purple 1177 pmc tb2-a 1 akg 414 eb 2 at 4060 josephson c42 mp senn 421 sm 57 unidyne 545 i get pretty good results for a total amateur. here's my thoughts: i buy another used motu to run 16 tracks simultaneously can i record 8 tracks to tape, send that off the cue head to one motu and record 8 more tracks with the other one? is there "latency" for lack a better way of saying it if i go off the cue head? will all 16 tracks be synced up? i realize the motu's aren't the greatest, but for short money i can get one and not have to alter too much as opposed to say an apogee ensemble where i would need a better computer and logic upgrade. this way i could also get a bunch of dynamic mic i'm lusting after. help me out, curse me out, any opinions welcomed thanks, jonathan |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
If you run OS 10.4 (Tiger) on your Mac, you can hook up any combination of audio interfaces and have the system recognise them as 1 big interface with all its ins & outs in sync. That system won't care if the input signal comes from a tape machine or from a live instrument. Or you could go out the 2nd Motu into the 1st via ADAT lightpipe. That second unit doesn't have to be another 828, BTW. Might as well be any 8-channel converter with ADAT optical connectors (Behringer or SMProAudio if you wanna go real cheap, or RME, Appogee or MetricHalo if you got the $$)
__________________ André ___________________________________________ "Recording exactly what a musician hears turns out to be a really big deal." Bob Olhsson "Who cares about efficiency, when we're talking about music?" Rupert Neve "it'll sound different through a microphone, anyway" Keith Carlock "no room, no boom!" Michael Wagener |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do CD's Still Make Sense | moderngroove | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 14 | 2nd August 2007 03:51 AM |
| does this make sense? A/D converter question.. | mister | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 19th July 2007 12:07 AM |
| Does this technique make sense? | Alécio Costa | Mastering forum | 4 | 19th January 2007 09:53 PM |
| does that make any good sense to you?.. suggestions please | activexjava | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 1st December 2006 12:12 PM |
| black crowes...doesn't make sense | genericperson | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 30th June 2004 11:13 PM |
| |