![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Digidesign 192i/o vs Apogee Rosetta 800? | Plove | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 31st March 2006 03:48 AM |
| HD 96i/o v. 192i/o | s0nguy | High end | 17 | 26th July 2004 12:18 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: SanDiego
Posts: 10
| Digidesign 96i/o vs 192i/o Hi guys,i'm wondering how much better is 192 vs96i/o.I know that the 192i/o has a lot of exp. options,but compering both at the same Sample rate/96 or48k/which one sounds better.I'm not planing to record at 192k at all. Thanks guys!!! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Moderator emeritus Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,170
| There was a thread on this sibject within the last week or so - someone who has used both (as opposed to someone who has heard about both) says that indeed the 192 sounds better at 48 (or 44.1) than the 96. But don't belive me - do a search.
__________________ Dave Martin Java Jive Studio www.javajivestudio.com Cuppa Joe Records www.cuppajoerecords.com Nashville, TN |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Melb, Australia
Posts: 1,029
| Do a forum search here and DUC. My take as I own both. The 192 is nicer of course, although the 96io clocked of the 192 seems to be nicer then stand alone. Although I have not done any real technical tests myself. The 96io is way above the old 888/24's which were used by a lot of people. If you can afford the extra buy your first interface as a 192. Also the 192 has soft clip, adjustable inputs and outputs. you can add another 8 in or out to a 192. The 96 is not upgradable |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |