![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Neve / SSL / API console summing vs. summing box summing | Shaman | High end | 84 | 18th June 2008 05:20 AM |
| "Big SSL Bottom" from a summing box??? | EJolson | High end | 8 | 3rd June 2004 10:51 PM |
| A "Shoestring" mix for a passive summing mixer like Folcrom | Saudade | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 16th March 2004 01:11 PM |
| "In The Box" Emulation Of Large Console Techniques | Curve Dominant | Music computers | 83 | 1st October 2003 03:03 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 68
| "Faking" a console w/ summing box I'm just curious how people using summing boxes are "faking" console moves, like occasionally using outboard gear via a bus, or if it's neigh on impossible. I guess I'm mainly talking about the equivalent of manual moves to outboard gear. Obviously in the box (using plugs, etc) you can just automate the internal mixer sends, etc. For example - sometimes while mixing, I'll track a pass of outboard spring reverb that I'll occasionally throw onto a track using an aux buss (ie., if a synth solo, I'll ride the appropriate aux manually and only "wet" certain notes with the outboard reverb). Note that I'm not just recording a whole track of an effect - that would be easy. What I'm wondering about it how to OCCASIONALLY (ie., manually) throw on effects when there is no actual console/knobs/etc. The only thing I can think of it automating the moves in the DAW but then routing the audio to your outboard and re-recording - sort of a two-step process, less spontaneous but potentially viable. Just wondering what other people's solutions are. Hope this is...um...clear! |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,233
| Re: "Faking" a console w/ summing box Quote:
Since then i've gone back to just mixing on analog consoles and it makes a world of a difference. Having everything at your fingertips helps the process be quicker and more enjoyable. Less thinking more crankin. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 68
| yeah Thrillfactor, that's an answer I feared. As cool as I think summing boxes are for some people, I'm loathe to move from my console to one. But I started having bigtime EM/RF issues (the mixer is unbalanced) and thought I might have to move to something balanced and that acts as less of a noise antenna! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 389
| Shouldn't be too much of a problem, maybe a little different than you are used to. Just send the track to two outputs, one connected to the summing box, the other going to your reverb then to the summing box. It's like doing an old school styled live mix. Just use the input or output level on the reverb unit to fade it in or out. But I guess the feasability of this technique all depends on how many da's you have on your interface. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Minneapolis and Wiesbaden
Posts: 980
| I highly recommend using a half-normalled patchbay between your DACs and the Folcrom (or whatever brand of summing device you happen to choose
__________________ Justin Ulysses Morse Roll Music Systems Minneapolis, MN The RMS5A7 Tubule is here. "“I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization.” - Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |