Fleetwood Mac - Rumours - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Fleetwood Mac - Rumours
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th December 2007   #1
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Fleetwood Mac - Rumours

Who has info on the mixing of Rumours (1977)?
I have seen the classic series DVD, which was very insightful, but I would like to have more info on the mixing itself:
console? monitors? where?
how did they treat the rhythm section? Individual comps? subgrouping in 1977? Was the bass only a DI?
What fx were used? Plate? Or more?
More specifically on the bass: was it standard to filter out quite a bit of the low end? Cause on all the songs (and most other albums too), the bass is rather midrangey, without a lot of oomph.
If Richard D Or Ken C happen to be around here, I wouldn't mind them answering some of the questions (phenomenal job from those two gentlemen by the way).
Looking forward to getting some answers.
D.
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #2
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 18,969
My Recordings/Credits

Did that "rent time on it" Aphex Aural Exciter outboard unit get used on it?

quick google search... perhaps yes!

Aphex Systems - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Jules

Add your reviews to the new reviews area!
Gearslutz on Facebook
Follow my GS picks on Twitter
Jules is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules View Post
Did that "rent time on it" Aphex outboard unit get used on it?
That was funny I remember reading that on the rate sheet for Compass Point back in the day..."Aphex Aural Exciter Type C $25/hour" or something like that. I wondered what could be so incredible about this unit that you paid by the minute for its virtues. I guess it's all part of making it seem "exclusive"...
peeder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
Crash's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,893

Eagle Rock Entertainment

It won't get as detailed as you are looking for, but interesting none the less.

Studios used listed here:

Rumours - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
www.miximusmaximus.com
Crash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #5
Gear maniac
 
wineredno1's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 157

Some info here Article Preview - CLASSIC TRACKS: Fleetwood Mac 'Go Your Own Way'
Sorry its only a preview unless your a subscriber.
__________________
"There was crack on the corner and somebody dead, and fire coming out of a monkeys head."
wineredno1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #6
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash View Post
Eagle Rock Entertainment

It won't get as detailed as you are looking for, but interesting none the less.

Studios used listed here:

Rumours - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks, but that's the DVD I mention in my original post. great footage, but not really on the mixing.
Anyone who worked at The Plant, Wally Heider or Criteria in the mid 70's?
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #7
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by wineredno1 View Post
Some info here Article Preview - CLASSIC TRACKS: Fleetwood Mac 'Go Your Own Way'
Sorry its only a preview unless your a subscriber.
No subscription. does it go in depth about the mixing? if so, I'll take the sub.
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #8
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 18,969
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by peeder View Post
That was funny I remember reading that on the rate sheet for Compass Point back in the day..."Aphex Aural Exciter Type C $25/hour" or something like that. I wondered what could be so incredible about this unit that you paid by the minute for its virtues. I guess it's all part of making it seem "exclusive"...
My 2nd (!) punk rock band was in a studio with one of these but we weren't allowed to use it as we were ON A BUDGET! (1978 - Rock City studios, Shepperton, UK) Anyhow.. back on topic!
Jules is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
bunnerabb's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: The Big Wide City
Posts: 1,088

Send a message via Yahoo to bunnerabb
From what I understand, the Type C was used on the tracking but they played hell finding a mix room where the tracks didn't sound terrible.

AFAIK, it was mixed in a small, B room in North Holly over a porn shop.
__________________
"It CAN be done. You can drive a car with your feet, but that don't make it a good f*cking idea". - Chris Rock
bunnerabb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 665

I was reading a repro of a '70s article from some audio magazine on someone's website which was basically a very in-depth interview and discussion on the recording of Rumours. It included tons of talk about gear as well as techniques. It was quite evident that it was a pinnacle of '70s rock production. One of my favorite quotes was where they discussed taking eighteen hours on a kick drum sound....and still weren't happy with it.

That was a pretty great article. I'm going to storm my memory banks to see if I can't remember where I ran across it. I didn't have much luck with a quick Google search.
__________________
____________________

Bryan


Shoeshine Recording Studio
centurymantra is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #11
Gear Head
 
JohnDavisNYC's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: crooklyn
Posts: 40

Send a message via AIM to JohnDavisNYC
eighteen hours goes pretty quickly after a gram of cocaine and a case of wine....

john
JohnDavisNYC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 566

Quote:
Originally Posted by Local 47 View Post
No subscription. does it go in depth about the mixing? if so, I'll take the sub.
Actually there's more talk about tracking in that article than mixing. I think you can access SOS articles after 6 months, but I haven't checked that for awhile.
soundrage is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
Crash's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,893

Quote:
Originally Posted by Local 47 View Post
Thanks, but that's the DVD I mention in my original post. great footage, but not really on the mixing.
Anyone who worked at The Plant, Wally Heider or Criteria in the mid 70's?
My apologies, in my excitement to help, I blew through the first three lines of your post and went straight to the questions. DOH!!!!!
Crash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #14
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by centurymantra View Post
I was reading a repro of a '70s article from some audio magazine on someone's website which was basically a very in-depth interview and discussion on the recording of Rumours. It included tons of talk about gear as well as techniques. It was quite evident that it was a pinnacle of '70s rock production. One of my favorite quotes was where they discussed taking eighteen hours on a kick drum sound....and still weren't happy with it.

That was a pretty great article. I'm going to storm my memory banks to see if I can't remember where I ran across it. I didn't have much luck with a quick Google search.
Bryan,
me too, I recall having the article a few months ago. I think it was a 70's mag named 'Recording Engineer'. But as far as I remember it went in depth about the tracking, not really on the mixing. I believe it was an interview with both engineers (RD + KC).
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 665

Quote:
Originally Posted by Local 47 View Post
Bryan,
me too, I recall having the article a few months ago. I believe it was a mag named 'Recording Engineer'. But as far as I remember it went in depth about the tracking, not really on the mixing. I believe it was an interview with both engineers (RD + KC).
Ah yes...you are correct. It was pretty much focused on the tracking. I'd actually like to find that article again. I'll try and do a search with that magazine name.
centurymantra is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #16
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
I have a printout of that one somewhere. And I made it a PDF or it came as a PDF (don't remember). I'll send it to you if you want (pretty big file though, about 20 Mb)
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #17
Lives for gear
 
audiothings's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 1,402

just to say "keep the thread going"... it is IMHO and that of a million others, (and heres one of the exceptions where i meet the masses), one of the greatest albums of all time.
audiothings is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #18
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiothings View Post
just to say "keep the thread going"... it is IMHO and that of a million others, (and heres one of the exceptions where i meet the masses), one of the greatest albums of all time.
I believe so too.
It is one of the best-selling albums of all time, with over 30.000.000 copies sold. We're close to 20 posts deep into this thread (which doesn't mean jack sh*t, I know), and yet, very little info on how this gem was mixed. What I'm trying to say, is that there just don't seem to be an awful lot of information going around.
But please, prove me wrong
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #19
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 665

Quote:
Originally Posted by Local 47 View Post
I have a printout of that one somewhere. And I made it a PDF or it came as a PDF (don't remember). I'll send it to you if you want (pretty big file though, about 20 Mb)
That would be very cool of you to do that. I think it was a PDF. I remember pulling up a PDF composed of scanned magazine pages. If the GS e-mail function doesn't allow attachments, you can find my e-mail through the contact link on my website in my signature.

Thanks! thumbsup
centurymantra is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #20
Lives for gear
 
themaidsroom's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: nyc / london
Posts: 3,518

i have always thought
that "fleetwood mac" and "tusk"
sound much better than
"rumours"






be
well


- jack
themaidsroom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #21
Lives for gear
 
Bob Ross's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,932

Quote:
Originally Posted by bunnerabb View Post
From what I understand, the Type C was used on the tracking
Aphex Type C didn't come out until the late 1980's/early 1990's. For Rumors Fleetwood Mac would have been using the original Aphex Aural Exciter ("Type A"?), a considerably more comprehensive unit than the affordable Type B or C.
Bob Ross is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #22
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Ross View Post
Aphex Type C didn't come out until the late 1980's/early 1990's. For Rumors Fleetwood Mac would have been using the original Aphex Aural Exciter ("Type A"?), a considerably more comprehensive unit than the affordable Type B or C.
Right you are and awful my memory is.
peeder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #23
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
Where's the Fleetwood Mac gang?
I figured it would be hard to get answers, but someday, somehow, someone's gonna show up with all the knowledge...
In the meantime, let's start with some easier questions: one of the original engineers mentioned they preferred to work with API eq's while tracking, and parametrics for mixing: what were the parametrics available in the mid 70's?
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2007   #24
Gearslutz.com admin
 
Jules's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: A Yank in London, UK
Posts: 18,969
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by peeder View Post
Right you are and awful my memory is.
Hey! Don't sweat it, if you can remember the 70's you weren't there, right?

Jules is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2007   #25
Gear nut
 
Local 47's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: One place at a time
Posts: 106

Thread Starter
"Thunder only happens when it's raining
Players only love you when they're playing"


Test test one two one two test test
Local 47 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2007   #26
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,255
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by themaidsroom View Post
i have always thought
that "fleetwood mac" and "tusk"
sound much better than
"rumours"
be
well
- jack
That might be because they wore out the master 2" tapes and resorted to mixing with the second generation safety's, it's a foggy sound that record. They spent month's re-recording stuff until the oxide started coming off the tape.

What's the definition of "over-produced"?
When your tracks come off the tape onto the heads. I know where the top end went on that record, it's on the q-tips.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Jim Williams is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2007   #27
Lives for gear
 
FireMoon's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Coventry
Posts: 1,481

BBC2 over here in Blighty did a whole show about the album...I'm sure there is someone on here with a copy might do you the favour of sending you one... Pretty extensive interviews including about tracking and mixing...
FireMoon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2007   #28
Lives for gear
 
lord_bunny's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,284

Send a message via MSN to lord_bunny
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Williams View Post
That might be because they wore out the master 2" tapes and resorted to mixing with the second generation safety's, it's a foggy sound that record. They spent month's re-recording stuff until the oxide started coming off the tape.

What's the definition of "over-produced"?
When your tracks come off the tape onto the heads. I know where the top end went on that record, it's on the q-tips.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
can someone PLEASE make a plug-in that sounds like this! LOL
when i think of tape and warm i think of the first 8 bars of dreams. the arrangement in that song is so amazing with very little happening but each part having such a great impact.

maybe if i run four instances of voxengo tapebus in the 2bus i can get that sound...
__________________
Adam Miner:
Songwriter, producer, mixer, studio owner
www.adamminer.com
lord_bunny is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2007   #29
Gear addict
 
Clayphish's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 319

Quote:
Originally Posted by Local 47 View Post
Bryan,
me too, I recall having the article a few months ago. I think it was a 70's mag named 'Recording Engineer'. But as far as I remember it went in depth about the tracking, not really on the mixing. I believe it was an interview with both engineers (RD + KC).
Here it is:

17mb
RapidShare: 1-Click Webhosting
Clayphish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2007   #30
Lives for gear
 
Crash's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,893

I have always thought Rumors sounded sort of odd. It is amazing to go and do some back to back listening with this album involved. Me and my studio partner did some listening comparisons with Fleetwood Mac-Rumors, Supertramp-Breakfast in America, Pink Floyd-The Wall and Nazareth-Malice in Wonderland. It was beyond eye opening from an overall EQ and sonics perspective.
Crash is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Peter Green amp? (early Fleetwood Mac) miqer So many guitars, so little time! 5 8th December 2007 08:15 PM
the sound of the carpenters and fleetwood mac biktfader So much gear, so little time! 0 21st April 2007 02:04 PM
Gear used on Steely Dan and Fleetwood Mac? SonnyCrack High end 15 23rd February 2007 02:56 AM
Board/Gear on Fleetwood Mac Rumours superjimmer So much gear, so little time! 7 11th November 2006 06:16 PM
Fleetwood Mac tips chap High end 8 11th February 2005 06:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.