AT4050 opinions or better LDC in the 400 - 800 dollar range
heisleyamor
Thread Starter
#1
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #1
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
AT4050 opinions or better LDC in the 400 - 800 dollar range

I am thinkin about getting the Audio Technica 4050 condenser...I've been hearing great things about it...Does anyone have any clips of it? I am mainly going to be using it for softer singing and maybe as a room mic. I use my SM7b for more rock vocals. Let me know what you think though or if you have a better LDC in mind. Thank you
#2
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #2
Lives for gear
 
David R.'s Avatar
 

I love the 4050, very flexible mic, but I use mainly for instruments. I just have not found the right vocalist to make me say it is great for vocals.

I would say a better bet in the same price range is the AT4047.
#3
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #3
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
a used AT 4060 for about $600

or new $850 if you really shop around

thumbsup
#4
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #4
Lives for gear
 
lowfreq33's Avatar
 

The 4050 wouldn't be my first choice for soft vocals - it doesn't have a huge output. It might work if you have a really quiet and clean pre.
#5
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #5
Gear addict
 
Klauth's Avatar
 

I use both of my 4050's for room mic's. they sound very, "real" for this purpose! you wont be disappointed !!!
#6
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #6
Lives for gear
 
drumkideric's Avatar
 

IMHO the 4050 is one of the top mics in that price range. It is just a great mic to have around.
#7
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #7
Gear nut
 

I don't own a AT4050, but listening the clips in http://www.***************.com/jamroomsessions_home.php
i've found that the AT40XX series are a little bit muddy, with very low output. Not enought presence and definition to my tastes.
I own a Baby bottle. I was planning to update to a AT4050, but listening to these clips, I will remain with my Baby bottle, which I feel sounds more open in the top end.

What do you guys think?

Pandemonium
#8
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #8
Gear maniac
 
JimmySX's Avatar
 

#9
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #9
Gear nut
 

4050 is a great and versatile mic but my first choice for softer voices out of the AT 40xx series would be the 4047. Great mid-range and absolutly no risk of harshness.

Another good choice would be the Shure KSM 44 – smooth and nice highs.



Clarence
heisleyamor
Thread Starter
#10
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #10
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
ok so I'm between the 4047, 4050, and 4060...The 4060 looks nice cuz it's tube...any idea which mic would sound the best for soft vocals? and maybe acoustic guitar?
heisleyamor
Thread Starter
#11
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #11
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
the price of the 4047 is looking a lot more appealing to me. A lot of reviews say it is great on vocals and acoustic guitar which is mainly what i'm using it for. I'm not reading that it has switchable patterns though :-( ... I would like to use it as a room mic...so maybe i don't need an omni pattern...I dunno...What does everyone have to say about the 4047 for vocals? I'm reading reviews that it has some characteristics of the NTK and Neumann TLM103 but not as harsh on the highs.
#12
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #12
Lives for gear
 

AT 4050 or an EV 635a

Contrary to a previous post, AT 4050 is among the most sensitive LDC's at any price. For a vocal mic, it may not be colored enough for your taste. For all-around duty, 4050 in an AT shockmount with fresh elastic is hard to beat in the price/quality race. Sure, a fancy preamp is great, but it will shine on cheap ones too.

If you have $5-$80 to spare, an EV 635a is a very smooth-sounding omni model that might be perfect for your application. If not, it works great up close to guitar speaker cones.

Cheers.
heisleyamor
Thread Starter
#13
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #13
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
so AT4050 or AT4047 for Vocals/acoustic guitar?
#14
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #14
Gear maniac
 

I just got a BLUE Dragonfly (on sale for 500 at GC...black friday) and I'm living it. Great for MY vocals but I think the real trick here is to see what works for you. Definately check out BLUE though.

Good luck
#15
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #15
Gear nut
 
longfade's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandemonium View Post
I don't own a AT4050, but listening the clips in http://www.***************.com/jamroomsessions_home.php
i've found that the AT40XX series are a little bit muddy, with very low output. Not enought presence and definition to my tastes.
I own a Baby bottle. I was planning to update to a AT4050, but listening to these clips, I will remain with my Baby bottle, which I feel sounds more open in the top end.

What do you guys think?

Pandemonium
I hardly know what I'm doing so this probably doesn't mean much, but my experience is similar to yours. I have the 4050 and the Baby Bottle. Obviously radically different mics, and neither are ideal for my particular voice. A previous poster opined that the 4050 might not be 'colored' enough for many, and I think that might be why I don't reach for it usually when I'm recording myself. It doesn't really have that flattering presence boost that other mics have. But I'm in an imperfect listening / recording environment so I've reserved real judgment on ANY of my stuff until I can get into a bigger, better space. I do think it's a wonderful mic and I'm really glad I have it.
heisleyamor
Thread Starter
#16
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #16
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
I'm hearing from a lot of people that the dragonfly is amazing on guitar but doesn't work on a lot of vocals. I'm really tryin to narrow it down to AT cuz there are too many mics out there haha
#17
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #17
Gear nut
 

+1 4047..

Love it on singers especially..
heisleyamor
Thread Starter
#18
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #18
Lives for gear
 
heisleyamor's Avatar
 

Thread Starter
#19
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #19
Quote:
Originally Posted by heisleyamor View Post
I'm also still looking at the Rode K2... MySpace.com - Number One Gun (New Record coming out 1/15/08 - CHICO, California - Rock / Indie / Alternative - www.myspace.com/numberonegun i'm pretty sure he's using it there and it sounds great and it was rated best LDC in the studio in some magazine in like 2003 or 2004 ... doesn't mean much...but let me know what you think... K2? AT4050? AT4047?
I love my K2 and its continuously variable pattern, has a lush, darker sound compared to the only other AT I own, the 4033, so I can't compare to those, but it certainly will be different that the 4050. Got mine for $600, new, at a local music store (I think they still have one at that price).
#20
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #20
Lives for gear
 
666666's Avatar
How about the AT4050 verses the new 414 XLS?

I heard a new 414 XLS recently and it sounded VERY detailed, a lot of top end... maybe too much even...??? I only heard it once in an unfamiliar setting so I could be wrong.

Opinions on 414 XLS vs AT4050?
#21
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #21
Gear addict
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by 666666 View Post
How about the AT4050 verses the new 414 XLS?

I heard a new 414 XLS recently and it sounded VERY detailed, a lot of top end... maybe too much even...??? I only heard it once in an unfamiliar setting so I could be wrong.

Opinions on 414 XLS vs AT4050?
The AKG is almost twice the price of the 4050.

You cannot go wrong with the AT4050 for both acosutic guitar and vocals, of just about any kind.
#22
28th November 2007
Old 28th November 2007
  #22
Lives for gear
 
666666's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjy King View Post
The AKG is almost twice the price of the 4050.
Well, the 414 XLS is around $950 and the AT4050 is around $600. The original poster said he was looking for a mic in the $400 - $800 range... the 414 XLS comes close enough and should be considered. I'd love to know how these mics compare.
#23
29th November 2007
Old 29th November 2007
  #23
Gear nut
 

I think for Vocals and guitar the B XL-II would be a better choice, with extra presence.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
heisleyamor / So much gear, so little time!
0
heyheymymy / Gearslutz Secondhand Gear Classifieds
1
satellite542 / So much gear, so little time!
7

Forum Jump
 
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.