![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 115
Thread Starter | using DI boxes backwards to REAMP? just got a radial jdi, i've read a few posts about people using them backwards as a reamp box, but haven't read whether it is safe to do this. will running the di backwards damage the hardware in any way? thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,071
| I think it shouldn't work. Wish it would though. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,359
| The JDI manual talks about using that box as a reverse DI (for the purpose of reamping). If the manual doesn't say it, then it is on the Radial website in their discussion about DI's. I have one. It does not work as well as the X-Amp. It will not damage the JDI, but some of the tone seems to be lost and it is noisier. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 548
| possible? yes ideal? no |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075
| This subject gets answered about 3 times a week lately - plenty of threads to search through. Think about what a passive DI is and does, and think about what you need a reamp box to do: A DI presents a hi-z load to an instrument pickup, so it doesn't strangle the sound by pulling excessive current. It matches this to the low-z input of a microphone preamp. It does this with a transformer that has more turns on the primary compared to less turns on the secondary. So the DI does two things - it matches the impedance, and it lowers/attenuates the strong instrument signal down to a weak microphone level. With a reamp box, what you are trying to do is to take a very strong line level output, and drop it down to a lower instrument level. Impedance can be hi-z to hi-z. So a DI box lowers the signal when used the normal way, therefor it boosts the signal when used backwards. This is exactly the opposite of what you need in a reamp. Instead of the signal getting lowered, it gets boosted. This forces you to lower your DAW fader, or set the output of your D/A converter lower - which causes the poor signal to noise performance. A properly designed reamp box is a much better bet than a reversed DI.
__________________ My carbon footprint is bigger than yours. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,703
| Search my previous posts on this topic. I'd explained it in detail why it wouldn't work sometime ago. B. Edit: I just did the search myself, there you go: idiots guide to re-amping? |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ReAmp Boxes. Why are they necessary? | lukasxpop | So much gear, so little time! | 33 | 23rd June 2008 03:11 AM |
| Going backwards | james.ca | Music computers | 0 | 10th September 2007 08:50 AM |
| Backwards reverb? | Melkisedek | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 8 | 25th August 2007 04:23 PM |
| A Step Backwards? | mosrite | The Moan Zone | 3 | 7th January 2006 08:46 PM |
| |