Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Starting Broadband absorber, bass traps and superchunks today Wholyroly Low End Theory 5 18th April 2007 04:31 PM
bass traps vs broadband absorbers or both? help pls Wholyroly Low End Theory 12 16th April 2007 07:00 PM
Covering broadband traps question Carnivale High end 2 25th October 2006 01:34 PM
New Broadband Bass Traps from Ready Acoustics Ready Acoustics New product alert! 1 15th August 2006 05:06 AM
Budget Broadband Absorbers and Bass Traps Bang New product alert! 2 18th January 2006 06:30 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd October 2007, 07:12 AM   #1
Saudade
Gear addict
 
Saudade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Birthplace of the Soundblaster
Posts: 377
Broadband traps: Will this do?

Ok Owens Cornings or other fibreglass brands are apparently price-prohibitive where I live. The distributor recommended Rockwool (he also distributes OC), so I asked him for some NRC specs.

How's the performance based on the chart attached? Is it suitable to use for my DIY traps? From what I compare to other materials listed in the Bob Golds site, it is pretty alright.

This one is 100kg/m3 density, they have even denser ones. Is it true "Denser = better absorption" or do I have to look at the chart to know? They also have a type with "aluminium foil face" on one side. Is this equivalent to the FRK type for OC703 which I read absorbs better than the plain unfaced type?

For FRK type I read it is better to face the foil side "into the room" for better low frequency absorption (at the risk of high frequency reflection).

Do I understand "into the room" correctly in that the foil side is facing the opposite wall (not the wall it is mounted on)?

Thanks for any help
Attached Thumbnails
broadband-traps-will-do-mps500-1-.100.jpg  
__________________
Mr H.O.W.D.Y : Making the cyberspace a friendlier place - one wave at a time.
Saudade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2007, 01:06 PM   #2
Glenn Kuras
Lives for gear
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,902
Quote:
How's the performance based on the chart attached? Is it suitable to use for my DIY traps? From what I compare to other materials listed in the Bob Golds site, it is pretty alright.
I can't read the file but Rockwool will work just fine.

Quote:
This one is 100kg/m3 density, they have even denser ones. Is it true "Denser = better absorption" or do I have to look at the chart to know?
For bass trapping, if the panel is 4" thick then denser rockwool will work better. Once you get past 6" you want to go with less dense.

Quote:
For FRK type I read it is better to face the foil side "into the room" for better low frequency absorption (at the risk of high frequency reflection).
Yes, but you only want to use these as bass traps. For early reflections you do not want to use FRK or any fronts.

Hope that helps.

Glenn
__________________
Glenn Kuras - GIK Acoustics
www.GIKAcoustics.com
Need help with your room? click here
Glenn Kuras is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0