![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Liquid Mix vs. Duende (vs. UAD-1) | BackHand | So much gear, so little time! | 23 | 24th March 2008 01:29 AM |
| Liquid Mix and Duende | esmoove | Music computers | 2 | 25th July 2007 12:23 AM |
| Wyy SSL Duende model oafter C200 and let Waves take the 4000? | Dirty Halo | High end | 27 | 4th September 2006 12:23 PM |
| What happened to the 'WAVES The Waves SSL 4000 Collection on WEB SITE!!!' thread? | theother | New product alert! | 15 | 9th February 2006 11:34 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 9
| Duende vs. Liquid Mix vs. Waves V Series + 4000 Collection Hi, i've been searching the forums for weeks looking for the answer... i know that there is no definitive right or wrong to the question, i think i just need a few opinions from actual owners of the products... I was getting ready to purchase the Duende because i loved the idea of having the SSL in my rack taking some of the load off of my cpu... i rarely have problems with my processor though, so i'm not too worried about the load, it's more the SSL sound to me... then i start reading reviews, and find that a lot of people are happy with the liquid mix's emulations of 60 different eq's and comps... so i start reconsidering and pocketing half the cash and put it towards the next piece of gear... now the third wrench thrown in is, while all of this is going on i demo the new waves v-series and am really blown away... so now i'm stuck with the question of ssl duende, liquid mix, or both the v-series & the 4000 collection of waves... any help or educated opinions would be greatly appreciated... thank you |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,566
| I'm not really the right person to answer this, but I have a question for you that might help others give you a better response: What DAW are you using? It better have delay compensation... |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 3rd Coast
Posts: 2,026
| Are you ready a lot of positive reviews about LiquidMix here at GS? I don't pay much attention to them, but I had the impression that IN GENERAL it wasn't looked upon very highly. Waves is Waves. Good products - sometimes very good - from a horrible company. I'm always eager to explain how I've found a BETTER version of everything Waves makes (that's useful to me) from other companies. Duende is the best sounding eq and compressor I've used with a DAW and I've demo'd or owned most of the others that are considered "the best". I've had a lot of stability problems with Duende, but they've ironed themselves out and it runs pretty smoothly now in each of the 5 rooms where I've installed it. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 3rd Coast
Posts: 2,026
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 86
| The performance of my G5 2x2 based system increased a lot since I started to use the Duende. (I was using mostly Logic's and Waves Ren plugins before) So your thinking that external DSP will take some load off you CPU is absolutely correct. Sure software samplers and reverbs do hog your computer, but EQ and compressors on almost every channel add up quickly. The latest version of the Duende drivers are stable. Yes - I'm talking waaay to much about the Duende at this forum. I'm in love. ![]() EDIT: then of course it's the GS way of getting all of those you mentioned. :) I mean, they actually can do somewhat different things. Watch out for compatibility between the Duende and the Liquid though. Last edited by Mile-High; 7th September 2007 at 08:22 AM.. Reason: Extra slutinezz |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 188
| As the proud owner of Focusrites Liquid Mix I can go ahead and give you the thumbs up on it as long as... you have automatic delay compensation. The LM sounds gorgeous. It's like have 40 different types of the PSP Vintage Warmer 2 PLUS 20 sick ass completely different EQ's. If you like the PSP Vintage Warmers sound you'll LOVE the Liquid Mixes. With that said... being a Pro Tools LE owner... it's a PAIN IN THE ASS not having automatic delay compensation. Sure you can apply a delay plug in to the tracks that don't have the LM inserted but man... it's a pain bro. Well it just forces you to take a detour away from your workflow... and that can be a dealbreaker for some. Overall I think how much it does, how well it does it and its price... even with the headache that the latency causes... makes the Liquid Mix a no brainer for anyone who doesn't already have outboard gear. Even if you have outboard gear the LM is like having a 60 racks of outboard processors in a tiny ass little box. Not even professional studios have THAT much gear. I love it. ![]()
__________________ Minding his pre's and cues... |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Austin
Posts: 989
| Duende is about as good as it gets. Liquid mix is usable but IMHO it's not in the same league. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 563
| cant comment on duende, but having lived with liquidmix and tried ssl waves i think 1. is realtime use imprtant as you compose? cos liquid cant do that but sssl waves can if your audio card goes lo enuff 2. liquid gets more sound variety & they are pretty damned good sounds for the cash i'd prolly go for waves simply cos it's more usuable and not just something to add afterwards if you like that sound but then there's the whole 'do i want to patronise waves as a company' issue ![]() oh, and what Krumbz said about delay compensation... a pain
__________________ www.7161.com Free music space for artists bands & deejays Free podcasting for artists, bands & deejays |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2007 Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,023
| where possible i always go with total native solutions. i like being able to take an ilok somewhere and have my plugs ready but with LM & Duende you have to trek a piece of hardware around and that's just not me. i have the v-series and it's great. the waves SSL is a very popular bundle and would probably be my preference in this case - i have quad 2.66 mac pro so CPU isn't much of a concern |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 9
| Thank you guys for your opinions... i think you have spelled out what i was already thinking and that was... a. ssl duende is ofcourse the best emulation of an ssl... liquid mix is good for the money and the waves are good if you can get over that they're waves... b. the delay compensation is a pain if you can't manage it... i am in fact using a PTLE/002r system so i don't have the ADC feature... about 50% of what i'm recording is my solo work so i am conceptualizing, tinkering, tracking, overdubbing, mixing, etc. all at the same time... i think this may be the downfall of both of the external systems... so unless anybody has any terribly negative comments about the quality of the waves plug-ins, i think i may be leaning more heavily towards those... thanks again guys... |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: DK
Posts: 483
| Make shure to look at the waves API too - sweeeeet!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,366
| I have owned all of the above. The Duende is just not stable enough. Do a search, but its still an issue today as it was the day it came out. You will find people who have not had any problems, buy you will find many more who did. I found it very frustrating, but sounded incredible. Liquid Mix, is very good, a great bang for the buck, I would only use it with a DAW that had Delay Compensation, not protools LE. You can use it in LE, but it requires work. Waves SSL- Very Very Good, to me, a Must Have. Waves V - I love them as well. I'd pick the SSL plugs over them, but I would not give them up. Waves API, Very Very Good, strong contender with the Waves SSL, but if it got down to it, I'd go SSL. Hope this helps.
__________________ My hope is we will be able to debate our passion, vice argue a subjective point. Oh, if you ever want to talk about Jesus, PM me |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 86
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear | Duende, hands down, for me! I own 4 UAD-1 cards. I've demo'd the Waves stuff. I bought and returned a LM. The LM wasn't 'bad' at all... in fact, it was pretty good. But not nearly as good as ther UAD stuff and not in the same league as the Duende, IMO. Remember, for all intents and purposes, the Duende is not an 'emulation'. It is thew actual algorithm from the SSL digital console. The exact same code used on the the board itself. What others say about stability is true. I've been lucky from the word go with mine. Never any issues. The new drivers seemed to have cleared up a lot of issues for a lot of people. I can not state enough how great this device sounds and works. Also, the latest drivers let you stack 2 of them together. How cool is that? I'll have the ability to run 32 stereo or 64 mono channels in any given mix (at 48k, which I use). Plus, if you can cough up the money ridiculously over-priced Drumstrip plug-in, it will change the way you record, mix and think about drums. Well......I can't say that, can I? It did for me! It *might* for you. I haven't been impressed with SSL as a company when it comes to the Duende. Their support is shoddy and web/e-mail only. They have also been evasive, defensive and and marginally dishonest about different aspects of support, drivers, new releases, etc. But, in the end, the sound of this thing makes all of that seem unimportant. As soon as I load it up on a channel or bus and start tweaking, It is the deal of the century. It really is, to me, like buying 16 or 32 high-quality, outboard EQs and/or compressors for 2k. You did not mention UAD as an option. I would SERIOUSLY consider it. They all sound unbelievably good. Plus you have far more versatility than the Duende. Not to mention, UA is a dream to work with in terms of customer support, appreciation and service. Like another poster mentioned, I have been gushing about the Duende (and the UAD-1 stuff) a lot lately. I am starting to sound like a commercial. I guess I just get excited when I think about how much those tools have improved my mixes for such a relatively small price! Look at it this way. My 4 UAD-1 cards, all of the UAD-1 plugs, my PCI expansion chassis, My Duende, the Drumstrip plug-in and the new Duende that I will be buying soon comes to a grand total of...~$8,000. I can mix as many tracks as I'll ever need with those tools and get an ITB mix that rivals a lot of OTB mixes. If I add up $8,000 worth of outboard gear sitting in my rack, i come up with 3 channels of compression and 2 channels of EQ. Don't get me wrong, I love (and prefer) *decent* outboard gear, but I'm not rich, nor am I a big studio that can afford24 or 32 channels of kick-ass, outboard compression, EQ, etc. Wow, I'm rambling. Bottom line - if the Duende actually works on your system, it has no equal, in the plug-in world, that I know of!
__________________ -Mike Manthe Moonface, LLC ------------------------- Moonface Records | Studio | Publishing | My Web Site | | My Equipment List | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 188
| Quote:
Take the FireWire out of the front of your Mac. Pick up the Liquid Mix and go. It's really that simple. Um but you'll need to have the LM software on whatever computer you're working on to use it. But if you have a laptop the LM is ideal. This is how small it is. In the reply box... it would be from the left side of the actual box you would write in (this box i'm writing in now) to the right line on the RIGHT of the Smilies box. 8 inches maybe?
__________________ Minding his pre's and cues... | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear | I'm more then happy with my liquid mix i use it all the time max it out and never have a problem. I'm happy with the sound, i think for the money it's a good buy.
__________________ www.danielantix.com |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11
| I've tried all the waves emulations plug ins and they rank in this order for me: SSL4000 V-Series API Bundle |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 3rd Coast
Posts: 2,026
| Quote:
I wasn't afraid to tell everyone how much Duende's drivers sucked. It was one of the most frustrating things I had to deal with in recent memory. But with the latest drivers and a buffer setting of 256 I haven't had a Duende issue on any machine for quite a while and a couple of these are daisy-chained with hard drives. I'm glad I finally get to say that it's stable... Sonically, it's the best option available. No question about it. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: austria
Posts: 522
| duende is awesome when working waves 4000 is good but no way ssl... waves v-series is good but uadīs neve-series is better. i donīt like LM, cause it sounds like quantity instead of quality
__________________ trade or sale: * PELUSO P12, Tube Mic - brand new * trade pending* FOCUSRITE ISA 828 - BRAND NEW! -* EUR 1700,-* ACOUSTIC FOAM YELLOW about 46mē * EUR 8,-/mē |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,366
| Quote:
The degree of difference between Duende and Waves SSL is minute UAD's neve plugs are very good, but you can you get a few instances per card, I own all of them as well, and since buying Waves V, I never use UAD's Neve EQ's any longer. Liquid Mix is a High Quality unit; I've owned it as well. It is a utility piece and performs very well. I don't feel that FW devices like Duende and Liquid Mix have a place with MacPro's being so powerful now. UAD's will stay around for a while longer, simply because their plugs are the best you can buy, so I (we) continue to put up with the grossly outdated PCI(e) Card to be able to use these plugs. I mainly use UAD for 1176 and LA2A, as well as the precision plugs.
__________________ My hope is we will be able to debate our passion, vice argue a subjective point. Oh, if you ever want to talk about Jesus, PM me | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 105
| |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: philadelphia
Posts: 364
| Quote:
Great avatar | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 54
| Concerning delay compensation, I have Digi 002, there is a point to click to measure how much delay the plug in creates. Cant you just , then take that track and move it forward that many samples? |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
The amazing thing is, the Duende does that hardware thing too...which is proof, IMO, that plug-ins ARE capable of sounding as good as OTB gear! Mind you, I have 4 UAD-1 cards along with every UAD plug except for the Cambridge and the Helios. The Neve stuff is outstanding....amazing, in fact. Every mix I've done for the last 1.5 years has consisted primarily of Duende and UAD-1 Neve plugs for all of my ITB mixing. I use a combination of OTB and ITB mixing tools. The Duende and the UAD-1 stuff is the only stuff I've used that can actually hang with my hardware gear, IMO. The beauty of it is, it is 100% opinion and driven by taste and sensibility. So, none of us are right or wrong here.
__________________ -Mike Manthe Moonface, LLC ------------------------- Moonface Records | Studio | Publishing | My Web Site | | My Equipment List | | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |