EQ during tracking: if, then when? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

EQ during tracking: if, then when?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th August 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
andychamp's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Posts: 3,199

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to andychamp
EQ during tracking: if, then when?

First of all, if this thread is redundant I'm sorry: the search function doesn't like the term "eq". Here goes. I also don't wanna restart an old argument that's been done to death.

But are there any sources where you reach for the tracking EQ more often than not because the dry sound just won't cut it?
__________________
André
___________________________________________
"Recording exactly what a musician hears turns out to be a really big deal." Bob Olhsson
"Who cares about efficiency, when we're talking about music?" Rupert Neve
"it'll sound different through a microphone, anyway
" Keith Carlock

"no room, no boom!" Michael Wagener
andychamp is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
patrox247's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 1,705

About 90% of the time I'll have a Pultec on kick and bass respectively.
patrox247 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2007   #3
Will use anything...
 
ssaudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,374

yup, more often and not, drums and maybe bass, not on much else, though. However, I do make great use of Hi and Low passing during tracking
__________________
Cheers
Mickey

ssaudio is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
Benmrx's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,445

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssaudio View Post
However, I do make great use of Hi and Low passing during tracking
Now that's making a serious commitment.

I'm no authority myself, but I tend to EQ at the tracking stage here and there, although nothing surgical at all. Maybe that's because I don't have any surgical outboard EQ's? I do however have 14 channels of MM61 modules, and they have a 2 band, very broad bell/musical EQ that can work wonders on almost anything.

I guess I almost always end up doing a 2db boost on the Snare @ 5K.
__________________
"Sorry man I played guitar instead of going to school." -- James Lugo
Benmrx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 4,621

whats wrong with cutting thru eq? why would you cut flat?
Sigma is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2007   #6
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 22

Hi,
Dopey question here, but what's tracking? When you talk about applying eq to tracking, do you mean the final mix?

Being self taught, I'm not up on the pro terminology...

Whilst I'm at it - what's the mix bus? I was reading a thread about a plug in - URS control strip Pro, and people mentioned using it on the mix bus...
Does this mean applying it to every audio channel and tweaking it as necessary, or applying it to the main stereo output as an overall analogue sound thing - 'glueing the sound' (I'm learning sort of!)

When I write, I generally add stuff to each channel as I'm going along to get things sounding ok, then go back through and do a final mix, tweaking eq compression etc, and then finally master it on the stereo master output - so im guessing this process includes tracking and mix busses somewhere...

Cheers
Richard
London_Richie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
dubrichie's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,465

Quote:
Originally Posted by London_Richie View Post
Hi,
Dopey question here, but what's tracking? When you talk about applying eq to tracking, do you mean the final mix?
tracking = recording. so, recording through / with the EQ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by London_Richie View Post
Whilst I'm at it - what's the mix bus?
the mix buss = the main stereo output, that signal which is comprised of all others "mixed" together.
__________________
Regards,

Richie.

"a paradigm of restraint and good taste at a time of frequent excess"
dubrichie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2007   #8
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 22

Hey Richie,

I now see the light. You obviously took pity on my name

Cheers,
Richie
London_Richie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #9
Will use anything...
 
ssaudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,374

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benmrx View Post
Now that's making a serious commitment
Nah, it just saves doing it later. It's just experience, understanding the sounds, mics and what's needed etc...etc...
ssaudio is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,787

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssaudio View Post
Nah, it just saves doing it later. It's just experience, understanding the sounds, mics and what's needed etc...etc...
Agreedthumbsup
Rick Sutton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
rainsinvelvet's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,224

I will almost always do some EQing on the kick and snare while tracking. Other things as needed. BUT, I've been tracking to 2" tape and so I'm adding/ cutting more eq than I might normally do..

But, yes.. I have no problem making it sound like a finished record as soon as possible. I HATE leaving things to decide at mix time..

ERic
__________________
It is a very mixed blessing to be brought back from the dead.
Kurt Vonnegut
rainsinvelvet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #12
Gear Guru
 
AllAboutTone's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: S.Carolina
Posts: 12,235

I eq kick and bass guitar, the rest is more on the flat side, if needed i do it post.
AllAboutTone is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
insomnio's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,209

I don't like anyone to bring me eq'd tracks to mix. I love to shape my mixes and have all the possibilities opened. So, don't eq while tracking unless you really know what you're doing, and know the productors concept well.
You can do wonders with mics and possitions. There is nothing like the adequate mic.
__________________
Insomnio
insomnio is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #14
Lives for gear
 
patrox247's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 1,705

Quote:
Originally Posted by insomnio View Post
I don't like anyone to bring me eq'd tracks to mix. I love to shape my mixes and have all the possibilities opened. So, don't eq while tracking unless you really know what you're doing, and know the productors concept well.
You can do wonders with mics and possitions. There is nothing like the adequate mic.
I agree with this in the case of inexpierienced engineers. A good vet will only make your job easier.
patrox247 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #15
Lives for gear
 
C_F_H_13's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 838

I always track with EQ. I'm all about commiting to sounds before they hit tape, makes mixing alot easier.

Kick/Snare always get some neve or api console eq, never much though, a couple of db of 10khz or a little boost at 60hz.

Room mics. I always go bananas with eq on these. Top end, low end, and probably a healthy dose of compression.

Bass a little bottom, cut some low mid.

Guitar I don't touch, and rarely do I eq a vocal. If I do it'll be a little top end.


OF course, before I eq I always switch mics, preamps, and all that. Placement is still one of the best eqs.
C_F_H_13 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #16
Pragmatic Snob
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 12,005

shelves and wide bells are your friend, think of it less as 'eq'ing' and more as 'tone shaping'.

i just recorded vocals for my latest track with the 120hz hipass engaged on the pre; the engineer was highly suspicious, but it allowed me to get nice and cozy with the 84. it sounds like butta.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________

Clariphonic DSP On Sale Now!!

Kush Audio


......

Kush Audio: High End Just Got Higher
____________________
u b k is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,046

Yeah i always do, people need to start being confident in their skills
deuc647 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #18
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 208

Here is a thread I started. Good stuff! Eq or not while tracking drums?
cfdude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #19
Lives for gear
 
macleodgrant's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,419

i only eq some instruments like accoustic guitar and then it's on 1.5dB with a high & low shelf. it's crap listening to too full a sound that's drowning other instruments. you can also identify easier if the part is working or not.

i think for beginner, rather try and get the sound you want by adjusting the mic position but once you're comfortable with that and mixing then start playing with the source but use a good eq
macleodgrant is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #20
Will use anything...
 
ssaudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,374

Quote:
Originally Posted by insomnio View Post
I don't like anyone to bring me eq'd tracks to mix. I love to shape my mixes and have all the possibilities opened. So, don't eq while tracking unless you really know what you're doing, and know the productors concept well.
You can do wonders with mics and possitions. There is nothing like the adequate mic.
I agree with what you are saying in principal, but well engineered drums itch the crap taken out (which is all I do) should never be a problem - and never has been for anything I've passed on
ssaudio is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #21
Lives for gear
 
Sinewave's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 550

OT: Hello gents, could some of you be kind enough to list some of the EQ's you use to do surgical or sweeting work and if they are Solid State or Tubes.
Thank you for your time.
__________________
"when you have a good performance you have a good mix"
Sinewave is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #22
has all the gear he needs
 
Unclenny's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 7,231

Hey...if I like the feel that I've dialed in...and it sounds good, I track. Gotta commit sometimes, right?

It is, after all, only music.
__________________
"The main thing is to have a gutsy approach....but use your head." Julia Child

"i was not looking at what it was doing, i just kept going till it sounded full." jamesyeah

"Sometimes invisible are these glistening threads........" Janni Littlepage


Leonard Scaper......Like Dominoes (We Fell)
Unclenny is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #23
Lives for gear
 
rainsinvelvet's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,224

Quote:
Originally Posted by insomnio View Post
I don't like anyone to bring me eq'd tracks to mix. I love to shape my mixes and have all the possibilities opened. So, don't eq while tracking unless you really know what you're doing, and know the productors concept well.
You can do wonders with mics and possitions. There is nothing like the adequate mic.
At this point in my personal quest for better sounding recordings I am all about doing whatever it takes to make it sound like I want it to.. I always move mics / change the source/ ect. first but then if I need to add 10db of eq or make an eq look like a topical map to make it jump I will do it !

I have found that the more things that I leave up to mix time the longer it takes me to get to where I want it to go.. Now, while I understand the idea of leaving yourself "outs" I also want the band to be stoked the minute they here playback..

Now, this is just my way of working. everyone is different (obviously)..
I feel like the above quote is a little bit rigid with the "rules" concept but, maybe it wasn't directed at me

ERic
rainsinvelvet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #24
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 4,621

anyone who can't eq to todays recoding storage mediums would never have made it in analog only days..your tracks would have tons of hiss once you put top end in on the tape out side of the equation.. in the old days it was also better to do the concept of "1/2 in and 1/2 out eq" [not really how it worked but split the extremes] so the comb filtering thru analog eq's didn't get to be too much
__________________
"The notes I handle no better than many pianists. But the pauses between the notes, ah, that is where the art resides." Artur Schnabel


http://miketarsia.com

https://www.facebook.com/mike.tarsia

https://members.grammy365.com/users/mike-tarsia
Sigma is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #25
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 9,408

Always.using good eq's.
boost,cut,lowpass,hipass..whatever.
Vox seem to get the least until mix.
RoundBadge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #26
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,699

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundBadge View Post
Always.using good eq's.
boost,cut,lowpass,hipass..whatever.
Vox seem to get the least until mix.
Exactly the same thing here as well with the exception that vox seem to get the least during mix for me as well.

I might do a little EQ on lead vocals but usually things just start getting strange when I get radical with vocal EQ. I will add a little top EQ to an electric guitar when tracking but keep the R121 up there without a question etc. On a vocal I am much more likely to search for "the mic" for that singer and song over EQ settings... but that is just me.
__________________
Michael
not_so_new is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2007   #27
Will use anything...
 
ssaudio's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,374

Quote:
Originally Posted by rainsinvelvet View Post
maybe it wasn't directed at me
I think he was making the point from a mix engineers point of view

I can see it both ways. If I'm going to be mixing, I'll work your way, if the mix is someone else's task, I'll be mindful of that when I track
ssaudio is online now  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
tracking = ? ? ? youngkain Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 6 17th April 2006 05:27 PM
Tracking sounds into Logic. Serious A/D tracking mysteries. Need some help. Mitch Lowen Music Computers 1 1st March 2006 02:39 AM
Tracking sounds into Logic. Serious A/D tracking mysteries. Need some help. Mitch Lowen Low End Theory 3 28th February 2006 04:38 PM
Do you EQ while tracking? Almost Human So much gear, so little time! 31 18th February 2006 12:02 AM
Tracking? Dave Martin Q&A with Mike Shipley 5 13th June 2004 06:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.