![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Fostex G24S Record/Playback Hi. I'm a producer and musician from Denmark. I just stumbled over and mint condition Fostex G24S, with 15 new tapes.. I've been flirting with the thought of getting' a tape machine for years, and now I think I'm going' for it. But, I have one, probably silly question :-) Can I record via my preamps, to the tape recorder, and directly into my daw?? Or is it not possible to record, and playback, with all the signature sound of a tape machine, at the same time.. To be precise :-) can I just use the tape machine, like any other outboard gear, and record directly on my DAW, and get the "tape" magic to my tracks?? Thanks for answering a probably dumb question :-) All the best Rasmus Bogelund |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 505
| High end tape cassette decks had separate record and playback heads (I think the erase head was always separate) so you could monitor what was recorded on the tape in real time (well with a slight latency). If this machine could do that, yes you can use it for tape color in real time. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Wow, thanks for the quick answer.. The guy who's selling it, tells me, that it has 24 I/O But I was just thinking, that maybe the in's were sent directly to out (and of course also recorded) when recording, so that there would be no latency. So what you were monitoring during recording, was not the same "colored" signal, that you would have on tape, and listen to during playback.. Hmmm, I'm not being very clear here.. But I really hope you understand my question. Thanks again. Rasmus. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 505
| If the sound is being send through the unit then it would be no latency. But if you are monitoring what is being recorded on tape, by default you will have latency, as the tape moves from the recording head to the playback head. The greater the tape speed, the less the latency. This is how the old tape delays worked. I hope you understand this principle. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Yep, I understand the Principe. But, if the sound is being send through the unit.. Then I'll have no coloration.. Then it would be pointless to set it up. Do you know if this unit just send it through when monitoring, or play back the recorded material?? Cheers Rasmus. |
| | |
| | #6 | ||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 505
| Quote:
Quote:
Good luck. | ||
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 980
| As I remember well, the G24S is a single head machine, so it has an erease head like any tape machine, but only one head for record/playback, so it won't work for you unless you record to the machine and transfer to digital later. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | To recap.... If the machine is set to "repro" you will hear ther play head, and are hearing thr tape. There is no latency gor tracks previously recorded, but there will be latency for the tracks you are recording. Those tracks with latency WILL be the sound of tape however. If you are in "Sync" you hear TAPE for tracks previously recorded, and INPUT (no tape) for the tracks in record. Also no latency. If the machine is in "input" ....no tape anywhere. no latency. I think a better solution is this: Record 22 tracks on the Fostex, stripe time code to 24. Sync the DAW and Fostex...dump all tracks into the DAW, as many at a time as you can. If you don't have 22 conversion, do in groups while locked up. If you need more tracks, dump a stereo mix of 1-22 back into the DAW onto a new piece of tape, also synced to code however. (use the same start time as the first passes). Record 20 more tracks.....dump into DAW. Repeat until done. Truth be know, you usually can get away with visually and audibly lining up the tracks if you can't get sync working. The the above is the cleanest way. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 144
| As mentioned before theres no point in just sending it through the machine. If it has the sync card installed just lock it up to your DAW, record the tracks you want and dump them in there later for editing, vocals etc. I do this with my G24S and have no problems with sync and the tracks recorded on the G24S do sound good. Remember though its not a Studer 827 but I still think it sounds better than going strait into my MOTU 2408.
__________________ "There was crack on the corner and somebody dead, and fire coming out of a monkeys head." |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,069
| I agree. I've a client with a G16S with the sync card and he does exactly the same with good results and just to confirm, it has no repro head...
__________________ Cheers Mickey |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Thanks guys!! My purpose for it, was to record drums on it. I'm almost 100% positive, that there's no sync card installed. What's the cost for such a thing?? Hmmm, now I really don't know if I want to go through all the hassle. I think my setup sounds great, but as you probably all know, we always wants MORE GEAR!!! :-) Listen to some of my productions on: http://www.myspace.com/rasmusbmusic But again.. Thank you so much.. All of you.. Cheers Rasmus |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,069
| The sync cards are very hard to come by, but one of the lads at SCV London had a wee stock of them in his garage a year or so back, so it might be worth dropping them a line - probably £150, but I'm guessing If it's just for recording drums it will be fine, but you'll need to run it as the master, which is a pain If you really want the 'tape sound' it might be better waiting for an 8 or 16 track 1" or 2" machine with good sync facilities so you can run it as the slave - even then, it's usually better to record, dump to HD then, if you want to, use the tape again at mix down... |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 144
| SCV London Ltd 8330 SYNC BOARD They do have one at SCV £135. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,069
| yes, but it's been out of stock for years; try buying it ![]() things may have changed, of course, but the reason I knew about this in the first place was because of the efforts my client went through trying to get a card just over a year ago - like I say, worth trying anyway, because the guy did have a few at the time (via private sale) |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | I've just heard that the Fostex G24S should sound very sweet.. That's why I got interested in the first place.. But, what 16 track machines should I be looking for, that has great sync, and would be easy to setup? Rasmus. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,069
| it sounds fine, very good in fact, but it's 24 tracks across 25.4mm, so there's only so much it can do I like MCI machines with Lynx TimeLine sync the 1" 8 tracks are fantastic - however, they aren't cheap and they do need setting up, often the only black marks against the Fostex is that it doesn't have the sync card, if you can get one of them, it's a great machine and well worth the (little) money you'll pay for it just remember it doesn't have a repro head, so you cannot hear what you are recording until after it's recorded |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | Ok.. So what machines has a repro head?? Anyone you can recommend?? I need 16 tracks.. I think I what one with a repro head, cause the best solution for my use, would be to go through the machine, hearing the tape, and direct to my DAW.. So that the tape machine just becomes a part of my recording chain before the DAW. And again. Thanks to everyone helping me out in here. Cheers Rasmus |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: New Zealand
Posts: 205
| If there is no repro head, how do you adjust the level to tape while listening to the effect? IOW, I want to use a tape machine to record all my MIDI modules onto before the DAW. But I definitely want to turn the input levels up until I hear the tape compression on each instrument to tailor the levels. How do you do this if you can't monitor the recorded sound? I think you may be mistaken that no repro head means no monitoring to the tapes sound while recording. Roman. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
| Fostex G24S I have an immaculate Fostex G24S with 16 channel Synch Card, plus 1 new Tape, 8 used once tapes, and 9 used tapes. 24 Track Midi controlable, recently serviced. Any reasonable offers in which the buyer can collect would be favourably considered (because it is not light and would be prohibitively expensive to ship, and is too delicate an instrument to entrust to carriers in any case. I live in Scotland. Bob Thomas. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1
| Hey is that Fostex G24S still up for sale? I am very intrestedin it, i have a B-1 with autolocator, and a whole host of digital gear all midi synced and such, realy want to add another multitrack reel to reel to my set up. I also head over to Scotland on occasion to visit friends. Cheers Martin |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
| I'm interested in your fostex g 24s Quote:
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where to rent Fostex G24s or get tape transfer? | NuSkoolTone | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 23rd October 2008 02:37 PM |
| Wanted - VERY SMALL record/playback device | zemlin | Low End Theory | 4 | 9th February 2007 09:37 PM |
| Info on the Fostex G24S | wineredno1 | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 12th November 2006 10:24 PM |
| Can 744T record and playback simultaneously? | dominicperry | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 4 | 19th September 2005 02:51 PM |
| |