![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Yamaha HS Series | calvizio | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 1st June 2006 01:27 PM |
| Yamaha Intros HS Series Monitors, the classic Yamaha NS10M... | cynics1207 | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 27th January 2006 11:22 PM |
| Yamaha M series(m1516 etc.) VS. PM series | Rea | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 13th September 2005 05:58 PM |
| yamaha MC series consoles | justinhedrick | Low End Theory | 12 | 9th September 2005 03:23 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rating: | Display Modes |
| | #121 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 46
| |
| | |
| | #122 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 678
| Hi George The Yamaha n series seems like a nice all in one solution for the home studio/song writer and you've done a great job here answering questions. But if you read around on GS, there seems to be a high demand for a new low cost controller for the guys in the middle. I've mentioned in other threads that Yamaha could probably do it right and at a reasonable price. So I'm wondering, does Yamaha has any plans to make a DAW controller somewhere down the road? |
| | |
| | #123 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| does Yamaha has any plans to make a DAW controller somewhere down the road? Thanks for your confidence, We never discuss future plans.
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America |
| | |
| | #124 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,821
| Thanks for asking the question JB872. Thanks George for not giving us much hope. Someone please tell me who the company is that can integrate digital audio products and is willing to have an open dialog about the needs of its potential users in regards to a product that is severely lacking from the marketplace. Is it Universal Audio? Frontier Design? Tascam? Mackie? Behringer? Brad
__________________ Little Red Wagon Studios http://www.myspace.com/lrws How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW: http://www.youtube.com/user/redwagonstudio http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fusea...deoid=40930870 |
| | |
| | #125 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 678
| Quote:
1. If Yamaha is set on including pres, at least give us the option of bypassing them with our own pres so they're inline with the mixer. Nothing against the Yamaha pres since I've never heard them, but for us guys mixing ITB box, one of the most important pieces of gear in the the signal chain is a highend mic pre. Some people have even suggested DAW controllers with a 500 series bucket built in. 2. When in mix mode, I think you should have the option of using the digital eq and dynamic section as is or as a VST eq and dynamics controller. Let's face it, some of the plugins emulations out there sound really close to their analog counterpart and are going to sound better than 8 digital eq's on a $1000 board. The same should be done with the reverb. | |
| | |
| | #126 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 111
| just a thought Hey guys, i just wanted to chime in here for those of you who have asked about a controller, etc... If you are considering the n12 and still want a controller, why not go the route of an 01v96 v2. The conversion is excellent, you get pre's, dynamics, motorized faders, etc... You are looking at a few hundred dollars more for the motorized faders on the 01v (which you would be looking at anyways if you added a controller to you n series mixer, etc...). You can send and return up to 16 channels of audio EACH WAY (16 channels to and from your computer) at the same time. And for those of you who will ask, MLAN is working perfectly of my setup as well as on the computers of several people of know (if you want to find out how, pm me as that is another topic). I have and 01v 96 v2 and a motif XS. As of last week it is all hooked up via mlan. I can send signals to anywhere from anywhere with the click of a mouse. It is much more flexible than protools 003 (sorry, not trying to offend), as you can literally configure your mixer any way you want. I think the n series is a great concept if you have to have knobs for everything and still get your audio into your computer. But if you want controller capability, i think the 01v is hard to beat for not much more. Last edited by mostlykeys; 8th October 2007 at 09:52 PM. Reason: expanding on my explanation |
| | |
| | #127 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 111
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #128 | ||
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America | ||
| | |
| | #129 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 678
| I'm gonna have a more thorough read of the manual since it seems that the n series can already do some of the things I'd like it to do. And I know you can monitor VST plugins by pressing the wet button, but what about the plugins that have high latency like Duende? Using this function successfully depends completely on the latency of the plugin and how many plugs your computer can handle at it's lowest latency setting wouldn't it? And even though you can monitor the VST plugins, I'd still like the option of being able to switch the eq and dynamic section to a controller so the actual pots on the board are used to control the parameters rather than a mouse. |
| | |
| | #130 |
| Lives for gear | I've had my N12 for about a week now, and I've decided to keep it. The sound quality really is great, and it's a blast to use. I'm glad to hear they are now linkable, as I would love more channels. I'll definitally pick up another one. Will the Hardware Mix function be implemented to other DAW's? |
| | |
| | #131 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| Quote:
I sent you a PM
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America | |
| | |
| | #132 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Finland
Posts: 8
| Hi, I've been looking closely at the n12, seems very interesting. I've read the manual, went to see it at a dealer, but no real hands-on experience yet. Here are my thoughts so far: Pluses: + Excellent concept of merging analogue style mixing with DAW functionality. + Reassuring design implementation, putting the ADCs and DACs as close to the analogue signal interface as possible, and emulating analogue-style processing in the digital domain. + Signal processing takes place within the mixer itself, independent of computer. + Simple and quick compressor user interface. + Flexible routing, inserts on mic channels. + One function per knob! + Great subjective look and feel. Sturdy, professional, classic ... okay, even conservative, but sometimes (not very often) that might be a good thing ![]() Minuses: - No support for out-of-the-box analogue summing - Only one Aux bus (although thankfully separate from reverb bus) - No channel EQ bypass button - "Wet" monitoring usefulness highly dependent upon system latency. Will it still work at 96kHz sampling rates? - Development of integration features relies on cooperation of separate organizations. Will all future versions of Cubase include support for the n-series? Best, -joachim |
| | |
| | #133 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| Thanks for the positive comments. I will save screen space and only reply to clarify or offer some extra info - No support for out-of-the-box analogue summing It's not an analog mixer, sure. but it does summing. The n can be a stand alone mixer without a computer. It has a "warmth and airiyness' not usually associated with digital mixers. Each person has to judge for themselves "Tonal Qualities" but I think most agree that the 'n' sound is not the "sterile" sound that many think of when one says digital. - Only one Aux bus (although thankfully separate from reverb bus) Yes but there are some tricks you can do when used with a computer DAW ![]() - No channel EQ bypass button True, you must zero the 3 bands or use a VST EQ on that channel (that's new to the n) - "Wet" monitoring usefulness highly dependent upon system latency. Will it still work at 96kHz sampling rates? 96K? Of Course, all functionality, all the time. I usually demo the n12 with a buffer size of 512 samples to show that the n-series "wet" monitoring function works a bit better than typical DAW monitoring of yore. - Will all future versions of Cubase include support for the n-series? Cubase 4.1 and Nuendo 4 accept the downloadable AI functionality. They are available at yamahasynth.com Hope this clarifies
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America |
| | |
| | #134 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Finland
Posts: 8
| Thanks a lot for the reply. 96K? Of Course, all functionality, all the time. I usually demo the n12 with a buffer size of 512 samples to show that the n-series "wet" monitoring function works a bit better than typical DAW monitoring of yore. Okay. What made me doubt was the spec at the n12 download web page, according to which the recommended system sample rate for 5 ms latency is 44.1kHz. If I understood it correctly, using a less powerful computer ("Minimum System Requirements") may result in latencies as high as 50 ms, which I believe would render wet monitoring unusable. Increasing the sample rate presumably places even higher demands on the system. Cubase 4.1 and Nuendo 4 accept the downloadable AI functionality. That's good. I was just thinking in terms of future support -- will the AI features still be usable in 5 or 10 years' time? I guess we'll just have to see. -joachim |
| | |
| | #135 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| Quote:
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America | |
| | |
| | #136 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4
| Quote:
The n12 establishes a connection with the Connection Manager and all audio is seen in C4 and recorded properly. Playback is fine as well, but I cannot get the DAW Remote Control or DAW To Aux sections to communicate with C4. However, the DAW is recognized in the Control Room monitor section. Everything is selected mLan in the Device Setup of C4, and midi is deselected in the Midi Port Setup. mLan is selected in the Audio/Midi Setup and the mLan settings are there for the Midi Devices. I have installed all the latest drivers (mac_ai_v111_e) and repaired permissions, changed firewire cables and checked every possible thing I can think of, but the Cubase Ready icon never lights and there is no transport communication. Cubase AI4 doesn't work either. Am I missing someting? Thanks for any input | |
| | |
| | #137 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| I've sent you a PM , we'll get you going In the meantime, make sure you download and install the Steinberg DAW Templates without these you will not get the added AI functions or illuminate the Cubase Ready LED
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America |
| | |
| | #138 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
| Quote:
If you don't mind telling, what platform (windows, vista, mac?). What latency, and how reliable has the device driver been? I have had comments from other users that Yamaha is slow to maintain their drivers, even when the hardware is great. I have no first hand experience with Yamaha and device drivers, but everything I have bought from them has been very nice. (O3d digital mixer, DG Stomp). And Geosync seems like a real plus to have for support. But it would be a real drag to buy this and not get full use out of it due to driver problems. Thanks so much. Last edited by PharohOKNaughty; 18th October 2007 at 02:30 AM. Reason: fix mistake | |
| | |
| | #139 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| I'll answer the OS question and let RadioBox add his comments. OSX is currently 1 unit peer to peer. It is the new driver technology that proves to be very stable and is device aware meaning it knows the device and connects it, names the I/o and properly reports it to ASIO for connection to/from DAWs. Windows XP/Vista is Multiple unit driver and is the first network driver based on the new code. and is device aware of the new Yamaha devices (n series and Motif XS) It too is much more robust than drivers we have seen in the past Feel free to ask me any technical questions. As for opinions.. that's for you guys.. I'm biased..
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America |
| | |
| | #140 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4
| problem solved Quote:
I don't know if the Lacie fw drives being connected has had anything to do with it and I haven't tried to plug them back in yet, but the console will not work properly with the fw pci card in and does work <perfectly> without it. So, many thanks, George, for being tenacious on my behalf- I appreciate it! | |
| | |
| | #141 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| Glad to help another fellow Gearslut get 'n' to it :) Truly a labor of love.
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America |
| | |
| | #142 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2
| Hi George, This product looks cool but still trying to figure out when you monitor back in the N12 can you use the EQ to make adjustments ? |
| | |
| | #143 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| Notice in the block diagram.. (Input Selector Switch) You choose between Analog & DAW. Both the compressors and the EQ are available on channels 1-8 and EQ on 9/10 & 11/12
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America |
| | |
| | #144 |
| Gear Head | hi geo i guess what you meant in the diagram that i could either use the EQ of the n12 or use an plug in EQ? say i got the neve plug in from UAD, is it possible to control its pararmeters in the n12? |
| | |
| | #145 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: East Central Fla.
Posts: 129
| Gotta ask how's the sound compare to the Mackie ONYX that seems all the rage at this level. Just talking preamps here. I've got a DAW controler, and EQ in the mix via a UAD-1. Anyone gotta "N" recording they care to share??? |
| | |
| | #146 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| hi geo i guess what you meant in the diagram that i could either use the EQ of the n12 or use an plug in EQ? Yes that is correct say i got the neve plug in from UAD, is it possible to control its pararmeters in the n12? No, the n12 has an analog approach. It's forte, Awesome mic pres with 84db of gain, Very high end A/D/A with ultra low jitter wordclock, for stereo mixdown, pro console monitoring and ultra low noise, hi gain to really hear your plugins and make them sound even better on mixdown. Same as if you bought several high end analog pieces. Gotta ask how's the sound compare to the Mackie ONYX that seems all the rage at this level. Just talking preamps here. I've got a DAW controler, and EQ in the mix via a UAD-1. Anyone gotta "N" recording they care to share??? I can't answer without out bias, it's my baby. ;)
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America |
| | |
| | #147 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: East Central Fla.
Posts: 129
| |
| | |
| | #148 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: California
Posts: 678
| Quote:
1st: Warmth with air (if you know what I mean) none of our digital mixers have had that character. 2nd: By the numbers THD .003% (typical digital mixer .01%) Mic Pre gain 84db ( typical mixer pre gain 50-60db) Dynamic range 114db Input noise level -128db Best spec..... your ears
__________________ George Hamilton Yamaha Corporation of America | |
| | |
| | #149 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: philadelphia
Posts: 359
| Quote:
My question. Are there any video tutorials (3rd party) for learning this system? | |
| | |
| | #150 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
| [quote=Geosync;1584895]1st: Warmth with air (if you know what I mean) none of our digital mixers have had that character. My first post in Gearslutz but I've been around a long time in the recording/music business. Anyway, I've been fortunate enough to get my hands on a N12 and I'm amazed at the sound that I get from this board. Like George said, "Warmth with air". Spot on. I'm finding myself going back to the N12 for just about everything that I want to do because it sounds...well, analog-like and it sure as heck feels like I'm working with an analog board but getting all the benefits of some pretty cool new digital tricks that Yamaha has tossed in. The mic-pre's, to my ears are extremely smooth, plenty of head-room, warm and they definitely induce a nice airy quality when you want it. One of the first things that I do when working on a different console is take mics that I'm very familiar with and actually listen to the board pre's I'll be using. Mic-pre's aren't exactly rocket science but I'm always amazed at how much they often vary in sound... So, I try to determine if any glaring spikes or actual tonal emphasis "hot spots" are part of the "sound" of the mic-pre's. Nothing like that happening on the N12 mic-pres. Just accurate, solid amplification that really brings out the best in all my mics. It's as close to pristine sound as I've ever gotten including back to my beloved Neotek Series III, (long gone but not forgotten). At $1499, it is one amazing console IMHO.
__________________ Glen Heffner Avant Electronics Last edited by Kinetic Spirit; 25th October 2007 at 08:35 AM. Reason: spelling! |
| | |