question about parallel compression in Logic - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


question about parallel compression in Logic

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th July 2007   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 88

Thread Starter
question about parallel compression in Logic

can you please answer - is parallel compression look like:

?
reax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #2
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 240

-Set the main output of the audio channel(s) you want to compress to bus1.

-set the output on bus1 to output 1-2 and let the fader = 0 dB.

-Create Aux1 and use input signal (? I'm not in front of Logic now) from bus1. Insert a compressor on the Aux1 channel and use Aux1 for blending (The dry signal is on bus1).
netrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 88

Thread Starter
thanks, but hm, you have to say that my example is wrong?
i tried what you said and it doesn't affect the sound... like dry signal...
is anybody agree with netrom? i thought that i'm near the truth..
reax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #4
Moderator
 
Blast9's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,598

netrom is correct.

I do it this way: Similar to your picture

The idea is to send the dry signal to bus 1 and insert a compressor on bus 2. Select bus 1 as output on the channel

Use the bus 2 "send" to send the signal to bus 2... Just set it to between minus 6 and zero db.

You should hear the compression when you solo bus 2, so maybe you need an extreme setting? Put threshold low, attack late, and release fast, and choose 25:1 ratio ona drum track
__________________
::
New Album "Rooms" out now
http://www.andymitchellmusic.com
::
twitter > http://twitter.com/mitchellmusic - http://www.twitter.com/theyardbirds
Blast9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #5
Gear maniac
 
artnoiser's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: +-4 GMT
Posts: 189

Why not just use the audio track as the unprocessed track, and send the signal to a buss/aux for compression? Why set up two busses?

And::: Has anyone noticed how shitty something starts to sound when it's sent to a bus?

I just noticed this yesterday.

I never really noticed the sound changing that much before, but there it was - the unprocessed track (going to main outputs) sounds like it would normally sound, but what you hear going through the send (prefader, set to 0) to a buss after muting the original audio channel is something different...thinner, more brittle, less mids, like a weird eq curve.

it scared the pants off of me, and i've been using logic for a few years now. does anyone have the same problem?

or is there something wrong with my setup?

artnoiser
artnoiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
theblotted's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304

the reason to use 2 bus' instead of only 1, is because one may experience phase problems due to PDC.

the bus may collapse the stereo image, or sound "smaller", depending on how you have your pan law and UTM set. if pan law is -3dB, bus should sound okay.

oh, and this is LP 7.2.3; earlier versions didn't have PDC on Aux/Bus.
__________________
"You can imagine where it goes from here."
"He fixes the cable?"
theblotted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #7
Gear maniac
 
artnoiser's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: +-4 GMT
Posts: 189

Ok that makes sense.

Mh, makes me wonder, is the problem i am hearing with the sends related to PDC? I have Logiuc 7.1 which has PDC on auxes and busses too...pan law set to -3.

Could this perhaps be a da conversion/clock problem with my lower quality soundcard?
artnoiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #8
Moderator
 
Blast9's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,598

Of course, the other way to do it is copy the track and compress one of them, which I probably do more often come to think of it!
Blast9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007   #9
Gear maniac
 
artnoiser's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: +-4 GMT
Posts: 189

Quote:
Originally Posted by artnoiser View Post
And::: Has anyone noticed how shitty something starts to sound when it's sent to a bus?
i need to clarify this: a buss itself fed by a send of a an audio track sounds different from the audio channel by itself.
artnoiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
gsilbers's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora La Reina de Los Angeles de Porciuncula
Posts: 3,622

hmm. i wuld just bounce and turn into audio whatever u want to paralel compress as well as the uncopress or less compressed signal and import them to the session. that way you can time align more easily if there is phase issues.

if you are using battery or other heavy synths that could offset by ms logic pdc.

i try to bounce all synths and turn them into audio for two reasons:

its less processor intensive and my mixing will ususally turn better. and if in the future i upgrade OS or plugin then ill wont be able to open up the song again with those settings. so a print for backup its great. leart that the hard way :(
gsilbers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2007   #11
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,294

to the original poster, you have in fact achieved parallel compression. the issue with your implementation is that feeding the drums to the parallel comp with a send means it's a mono feed. that's not an issue if you want your compressed drums to be mono. be sure to make the send pre-fader, so that what you're feeding the comp isn't affected by level changes on your track.

i prefer simplicity and symmetry, so i would do it thusly:


set the output of the drum's audio track to bus 1.

set the output of bus 1 to No Output.

create aux 1 and aux 2, each with the input as bus 1.

compressor on aux 1, no compressor on aux 2.


keep the audio track at unity, otherwise you'll change what's feeding the compressor. if you want to change the level of the dry drum track, do so with aux 2.

once you have the balance of compressed/uncompressed, you can assign both auxes to the same group so that their levels move together, preserving that relationship. i prefer auxes to busses because auxes have sends, so you can send various amounts of the two drum paths to other fx, most notably reverb, sometimes delay.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________

Tapey Compressor | Silky Air EQ | Vibey Plugin Squeezebox...

......

Kush Audio: High End Just Got Higher

____________________
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007   #12
Moderator
 
Blast9's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,598

Quote:
Originally Posted by artnoiser View Post
Ok that makes sense.

Mh, makes me wonder, is the problem i am hearing with the sends related to PDC? I have Logiuc 7.1 which has PDC on auxes and busses too...pan law set to -3.

Could this perhaps be a da conversion/clock problem with my lower quality soundcard?

Not sure --- but I run logic 4.8.1 on OS 9.2 with a lowly MOTU 828 (ASIO drivers).

I've never had phase issues or signal degreadation issues as described.

If you use the transient designer-style Logic plugin Enveloper, then the look-ahead messes with phase on parallel buses/tracks unnless you set look-ahead to zero ms
Blast9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
theblotted's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304

Quote:
Originally Posted by u b k View Post
to the original poster, you have in fact achieved parallel compression. the issue with your implementation is that feeding the drums to the parallel comp with a send means it's a mono feed. that's not an issue if you want your compressed drums to be mono. be sure to make the send pre-fader, so that what you're feeding the comp isn't affected by level changes on your track.

i prefer simplicity and symmetry, so i would do it thusly:

ubk
.
good method.

here's an alternative: use Universal Track Mode off.

then you'll have individual left/right, giving one more control over how much to send to each bus, how much levels on each side, variation of plugin parameters, etc.. b

etter yet, have the option of pan width for original or bus'd drums. some may argue that different settings on each l/r side will yield a "wider" stereo image, not unlike a console with different paths left & right.. but may run into phase probs.

you now have the option to send to mono or stereo bus also. group the l/r together, bus 1-2 together, and even l/r & bus 1-2 as one.

the aux method can also be applied here.
theblotted is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallel Compression firstclizzy Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 10 4th November 2007 07:50 PM
Compression on a send (parallel compression) crabtwins Mastering forum 2 25th January 2007 07:41 AM
parallel compression in logic...??? Napalm So much gear, so little time! 0 24th August 2006 05:36 PM
Does the "Mix" function on compression plugins equal parallel compression? Maxwolf Music computers 8 5th July 2005 01:10 AM
Setting up parallel compression in Logic. How to do it. John_McEnroe Music computers 12 15th March 2005 05:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.