acceptable frequency response for a room? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


acceptable frequency response for a room?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd July 2007   #1
Gear maniac
 
mahler007's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 283

Thread Starter
acceptable frequency response for a room?

Hi Slutz,
I would like to test the frequency response of my room, and am just curious what a general, acceptable ball park figure is for its behavior... Naturally, I realize that as flat as possible is best, but somewhat impossible, especially given my circumstances.

This being said, what range of DB is acceptable between the highest and lowest frequencies? Is a range of 10 db or so considered acceptable, or is that pretty bad?

I am using a pink noise generator, an Earthworks QTC 40 onmi directional mic, and analyzing with the Wavesd PAZ frequency analyzer. Any advice or tips would be *greatly* appreciated.

Many thanks,
Andrew
mahler007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: portugal
Posts: 1,140

+ - 10 db should be ok.

Room treatment isn`t all about frequency response.... There are a few more things that you should take care.
__________________
Ron Paul
nandoanalog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007   #3
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234



Frequency response is the least of your worries.

The deep nulls are a problem.

Most of the other issues have to do with transient behavior - like early reflections, flutter, focusing, and ringing.

Also, control rooms and recording spaces are different in terms of what you want.




-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007   #4
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,007

Quote:
Originally Posted by nandoanalog View Post
+ - 10 db should be ok.

Room treatment isn`t all about frequency response.... There are a few more things that you should take care.
Agreed on the + - 10 db. And yes ringing is a huge problem.
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahler007 View Post
Hi Slutz,
I would like to test the frequency response of my room, and am just curious what a general, acceptable ball park figure is for its behavior... Naturally, I realize that as flat as possible is best, but somewhat impossible, especially given my circumstances.

This being said, what range of DB is acceptable between the highest and lowest frequencies? Is a range of 10 db or so considered acceptable, or is that pretty bad?

I am using a pink noise generator, an Earthworks QTC 40 onmi directional mic, and analyzing with the Wavesd PAZ frequency analyzer. Any advice or tips would be *greatly* appreciated.

Many thanks,
Andrew
+ - 10db is actually pretty good (remember that means only a 10 db difference between the loudest and quietest sounds produced in the room as measured from 20hz to 20k) .... room size and dimensions will really determine how easy it is to get there.

There may be a lot of people who say their room is + - 10db or better but often their testing methods are dubious. A lot of small bedroom "studios" are easily + - 30db if there is little or no treatment in the room. Dropping these figures down to + - 10db is tough!

I've read that even professional control room designers are happy if they can get a room within + - 6db.

I wouldn't use pink noise personally but a progressive sine sweep that steps 1hz at a time through the entire frequency spectrum. Likely you'll see most variation below 500hz.

So there you go.
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2007   #6
Gear maniac
 
mahler007's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 283

Thread Starter
hey,
Thanks so much for the replies, y'all.

I will do the 1 Hz sine tone tests as well, but can you tell me, or point me to a resource that tells me, how I can test for ringing, deep nulls, and all the other gremlins?

I should probably say that my room is already treated with broadband bass absorbers in 2 corners and high frequency absorbers on the front wall, ceiling above the mix position, and at the ceiling/wall joints. The room is a bit unusual as the right side opens out into a much larger rectangular room, hence the reason for using the bass absorbers in only two corners (the other two corners are non existent as a result of the opening into the larger room)

I am primarily using my space for mixing, editing, and "mastering."

Thanks again!

Cheers,
Andrew
mahler007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2007   #7
Gear maniac
 
mahler007's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 283

Thread Starter
bump?
mahler007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2007   #8
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Andrew,

Quote:
I will do the 1 Hz sine tone tests as well, but can you tell me, or point me to a resource that tells me, how I can test for ringing, deep nulls, and all the other gremlins?
This article explains how I use the ETF software:

RealTraps - Optimizing Acoustic Treatment using ETF

ETF and its sister program R+D are for Windows. There's also FuzzMeasure for Macs, and the freeware Room EQ Wizard. Google will find them for you.

Also, to answer your original question, most untreated rooms have numerous peaks and deep nulls that span more than 30 dB below 300 Hz. If you can get the response to within a 10 dB window at bass frequencies you're doing really well.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does frequency response ABOVE 20 kHz really matter? chessparov So much gear, so little time! 50 25th September 2008 03:44 AM
at4050 fig-8 frequency response Jimbo Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 3 26th May 2007 12:26 AM
Analog Frequency Response Lawrence So much gear, so little time! 27 26th February 2007 03:38 PM
Frequency Response jcool So much gear, so little time! 2 7th February 2007 05:39 PM
Help!: U87ai actual frequency response? brutze So much gear, so little time! 6 2nd October 2006 03:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.