![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 283
Thread Starter | acceptable frequency response for a room?
Hi Slutz, I would like to test the frequency response of my room, and am just curious what a general, acceptable ball park figure is for its behavior... Naturally, I realize that as flat as possible is best, but somewhat impossible, especially given my circumstances. This being said, what range of DB is acceptable between the highest and lowest frequencies? Is a range of 10 db or so considered acceptable, or is that pretty bad? I am using a pink noise generator, an Earthworks QTC 40 onmi directional mic, and analyzing with the Wavesd PAZ frequency analyzer. Any advice or tips would be *greatly* appreciated. Many thanks, Andrew |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: portugal
Posts: 1,140
|
+ - 10 db should be ok. Room treatment isn`t all about frequency response.... There are a few more things that you should take care.
__________________ Ron Paul |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234
| Frequency response is the least of your worries. The deep nulls are a problem. Most of the other issues have to do with transient behavior - like early reflections, flutter, focusing, and ringing. Also, control rooms and recording spaces are different in terms of what you want. -tINY |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,007
| |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
| Quote:
There may be a lot of people who say their room is + - 10db or better but often their testing methods are dubious. A lot of small bedroom "studios" are easily + - 30db if there is little or no treatment in the room. Dropping these figures down to + - 10db is tough! I've read that even professional control room designers are happy if they can get a room within + - 6db. I wouldn't use pink noise personally but a progressive sine sweep that steps 1hz at a time through the entire frequency spectrum. Likely you'll see most variation below 500hz. So there you go. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 283
Thread Starter |
hey, Thanks so much for the replies, y'all. I will do the 1 Hz sine tone tests as well, but can you tell me, or point me to a resource that tells me, how I can test for ringing, deep nulls, and all the other gremlins? I should probably say that my room is already treated with broadband bass absorbers in 2 corners and high frequency absorbers on the front wall, ceiling above the mix position, and at the ceiling/wall joints. The room is a bit unusual as the right side opens out into a much larger rectangular room, hence the reason for using the bass absorbers in only two corners (the other two corners are non existent as a result of the opening into the larger room) I am primarily using my space for mixing, editing, and "mastering." Thanks again! Cheers, Andrew |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Joined: May 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 283
Thread Starter |
bump?
|
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334
|
Andrew, Quote:
RealTraps - Optimizing Acoustic Treatment using ETF ETF and its sister program R+D are for Windows. There's also FuzzMeasure for Macs, and the freeware Room EQ Wizard. Google will find them for you. Also, to answer your original question, most untreated rooms have numerous peaks and deep nulls that span more than 30 dB below 300 Hz. If you can get the response to within a 10 dB window at bass frequencies you're doing really well. --Ethan
__________________ Ethan's audio book is now available! | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does frequency response ABOVE 20 kHz really matter? | chessparov | So much gear, so little time! | 50 | 25th September 2008 03:44 AM |
| at4050 fig-8 frequency response | Jimbo | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 3 | 26th May 2007 12:26 AM |
| Analog Frequency Response | Lawrence | So much gear, so little time! | 27 | 26th February 2007 03:38 PM |
| Frequency Response | jcool | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 7th February 2007 05:39 PM |
| Help!: U87ai actual frequency response? | brutze | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 2nd October 2006 03:40 PM |
| |