![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tascam DV-RA1000HD | crna59 | New product alert! | 12 | 13th November 2008 12:36 AM |
| Tascam DV-RA1000HD | songman | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 26th December 2006 06:55 PM |
| Tascam DV-RA1000HD | transfiguration | New product alert! | 9 | 19th October 2006 08:14 AM |
| Tascam DM24 vs Tascam M5000 | Gaston69 | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 11th July 2006 06:55 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 90
| Do I really need a TASCAM DV-RA1000HD What do you all think, they are supposedly nearly a a masterlink "killer" but they have a few bitching points. What is the peanut galleries opinion? I have neither unit. It would be nice to have something to archive with and master down to for a mastering lab if I can not master things myself... Douglas Wire PUPCo Studios... In shambles right now! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,397
| I have a CDRW2000 and the one thing that always drove me nuts about it (although I love the thing) is that you cannot burn Redbook CD's with it. When the DV-RA1000HD came out I called Tascam and asked if they finally integrated Redbook CD burning. The answer was no. So, Masterlink killer? Well, although I'm sure it's a great unit, the price tag is hefty for what it is, and since most every mastering house has a Masterlink (and I would guess very few have a DV-RA1000HD), plus the fact that it doesn't do standard Redbook CD burning, made the decision to pass on this one easy for me. I still think that the Masterlink, if you use an outstanding A/D converter like the UA2192 prior to the signal getting to the Masterlink is still the way to go. Plus you can slave the Masterlink to the UA2192 and just feed it an AES/EBU signal up to 96k. Hope that helps!
__________________ Joshua Aaron President/Chief Engineer AudioLot/AudioLot Studios High End Pro Audio Sales & Consulting Recording/Music Production/Mixing http://www.audiolot.com |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Oracle Arizona
Posts: 411
| Quote:
So why use a Masterlink if you can burn a good CD master using, e.g. Wavelab and a Plextor drive? I am just curious why you would go through the extra stages of production rather than work ITB. The reason I ask is that I almost bought a Masterlink just to have a totally reliable burner, but then ended up with a new DAW with 2 Plextor DVD/CD drives, and have checked the results using Plextools, and they look fine, and have duplicated fine. Last edited by diamondjim; 13th June 2007 at 08:50 PM.. Reason: changed replicated to duplicated | |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Austin TX
Posts: 80
| Masterlink vs. Tascam 1000HD Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() for shame | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Oracle Arizona
Posts: 411
| Amazing, huh? Wavelab supports the Red Book standard for a lot less. That and a good Plextor drive, enough for me, I don't use SACD or DSD. I can also do DVD-A with WL6 if I want better resolution audio. The Masterlink looks like a great box, but unless you are receiving masters in its proprietary 24-bit format, I don't see the need. diamondjim Barn Jazz Home |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,397
| The reason to go with a Masterlink is for burning proprietary 96k CD's for mastering and/or the reason for using this instead of converting via software you can send your 2-bus mix out your D/A and then into another high-end 2 channel A/D like the UA2192 as I suggested so that you aren't downsampling/dithering ITB and instead are simply converting an analog signal to digital in the resolution required for CD (16/44.1).
__________________ Joshua Aaron President/Chief Engineer AudioLot/AudioLot Studios High End Pro Audio Sales & Consulting Recording/Music Production/Mixing http://www.audiolot.com |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Oracle Arizona
Posts: 411
| Quote:
For now am planning to go out 8 ch. to the Folcrom, sum to 2-buss, then into an ADL600 for makeup gain, and then come back into the box via my RME FF800 and then make the CD via Wavelab. Maybe later when I get a good AD converter the Masterlink will come back into the picture. Thanks! diamondjim Barn Jazz Home | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Valley Glen, CA
Posts: 62
| DSD! The main reason I purchased the DVRA1000HD was for the ability to deliver DSD masters to my mastering house. Granted, not every mastering facility has DSD capabilities, but if it does, the sound difference between DSD and 192/96/44 should warrant the purchase. The unit has been completely solid since I installed it and it sounds better to my ears than my Masterstink.
__________________ Peace and Grooves ![]() Thai Long Ly TL2 Productions http://www.myspace.com/tl2productions http://www.thailongly.com |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Calabasas, California
Posts: 1,138
| i purchased over a year ago to mix down to a higher rez source than session as I use a nicerizerizer and outboard compression/eq so I figure that I my as well print to something higher rez than session. My personal conclusion/opinion is the following: -always print to a master and safety. Sitting in a mastering session with Marcussen and not having three masters come up was NOT COOL. -always use the preferred Sony Media -DSD (internal converts) sounds very very good and IMO is very very close to the analog source. -internal 192k PCM sounds very good and I don't know if in blind test I could tell the difference between the 192k and DSD. -96k internal takes a step down -when mixing 48k sessions and bringing back the print through the converters into pro tools....the internal Tascam converters sound better than the 192i/o (clocked to antelope isochrone). -reliability sucks, not having a HD sucks (although I guess they do now)but you can back up dsd files and pcm files and ultimately still protect yourself. For me personally it has become indispensilbe as it gives so many options. I purchased mine for somewhere around 1200 I guess. The fact that I use it as a mixdown converter, format and even use the consumer line level fed to my boom box, I can't beat it right now. I also shot out with David Leonard listening to the return of the 192i/o, 1/2" 30ips 499, and DSD. DSD was closest to the source. Tape sounded good, and pro tools did not perform in comparison. That's my experience...
__________________ doug |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NYC
Posts: 63
| Unlike the DV-RA1000HD, the DV-RA1000 owner's manual (p. 7) states red book compatibility: CD-R and CD-RW These become standard CDDA discs to Red Book standard. When recording these discs, the DV-RA1000 acts as a CD recorder, with standard features such as synchronized recording, etc. I wonder if that was an error? |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Posts: 858
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 124
| It does burn red book ![]() |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 19
| Yes, but you get a free copy of DiskWelder Bronze that allows you to burn either a DVD-A of high resolution PCM from DSD files or to simply convert the files to PCM and edit them in your DAW, etc. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 52
| NO REDBOOK??? where did you get that bogus info? [quote=kittonian;1325000]I have a CDRW2000 and the one thing that always drove me nuts about it (although I love the thing) is that you cannot burn Redbook CD's with it. When the DV-RA1000HD came out I called Tascam and asked if they finally integrated Redbook CD burning. The answer was no. So, Masterlink killer? You actually think that Tascam would make a product that is supposed to blow the masterlink out of the studio and not have redbook capablility? Come on dude?..your smoking some bad sh..eet.. No, I don't work for tascam..I am just a proud new owner of a Tascam DV-RA1000HD...and it kicks mule ass!!! Awesome D/A converters for monitoring for one, (it has the best chip Burr Brown's latest and flagship D/A) second...it does record red book cds..and has kick butt A/D converters too. I am doing this as we speak.. Transfering my old cassettes and LPs to a CD. So yes, it has redbook for the big $2000 you spend for this unit. And I sold my lavry DA10 that I used to use for monitoring for my tascam. The converters on the new Tascam is quite good. A tad bit better than the lavry's in the bass realm. I hear more of the bass instrumentation than I do with the Lavry. Don't get me wrong I kept my lavry over my benchmark which are all good converters for d/a monitoring. But I am a anal dude..about sound. This is the perfect reason why me must all take Gearslutz info with a grain of salt...and not to heart.. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 285
| I am waiting on mine to get here. I will try to do some tests and see. I can't wait for it to show up.
__________________ www.theaudiofrequency.com |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 98
| Big Ben? Has anybody tried the unit clocked to a Big Ben?
__________________ "I promise. This is the last thing I'm buying." |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: New England, USA
Posts: 493
| Threadbump.
__________________ "Signature-line free since 2004!" |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 669
| These things are great for live stereo recording. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 204
| i record my mixes on a cdrw 2000 after it goes through my outboard rack..i used to do audio mixdowns in nuendo, use wave plug ins and such, master with t-rax and burn onto a plextor drive but , for me it's just warmer and bigger on the cdrw 2000, but it's a mixing out of the box thing though..and by the way, i clock the tascam with a prehistoric aardsynk 2 and everyone can tell the difference between the cdrw 2000 internal clock and the aardsync.. the aardsync is clearly better. the instruments are more separated and just tighter, the bottom end in particular..i never used big ben but depending on the situation, it could definetly be an improvement.. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |