How direct are the "direct outs"?? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


How direct are the "direct outs"??

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th May 2007   #1
SMT
Gear maniac
 
SMT's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 226

Thread Starter
Send a message via MSN to SMT
How direct are the "direct outs"??

Is there a loss of quality in the audio if I would:
Use a high-end mic pre + EQ and go into a lowend console mic in - bypass the EQ in the console, and using the Direct Out to a A/D - DAW....????

Of course compared to going straight from the mic pre + eq into the A/D

I would prefer to go into the console and use the direct-outs. That would help me with the routings, aux etc....

The thing is that I´ll get a high-end mic pre to test for a minimum time soon, and I actually don´t have the time testing different ways, with the band/client beeing there and all.... So has someone tried these different ways and compared?
SMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 666

Don't use two mic preamps in a row! Unless you're going for a certain sound!

If you need to go into the console after your highend preamp, you could try using an insert return on a console channel.
__________________
HighHouse
http://highhousemusic.blogspot.com (Blog on sound, music, etc.)
Joemamma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 97

Quote:
Is there a loss of quality in the audio if I would:
Use a high-end mic pre + EQ and go into a lowend console mic in - bypass the EQ in the console, and using the Direct Out to a A/D - DAW....????

Of course compared to going straight from the mic pre + eq into the A/D

I would prefer to go into the console and use the direct-outs. That would help me with the routings, aux etc....

It's always better going direct with a short lead.I've tried both ways.
You can always hear a difference if there is more signal path in the system.
I highly recommend avoiding the console by all means if you want to preserve the detail in your signal.
david_fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007   #4
Gear maniac
 
DrKoss's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 169

Send a message via AIM to DrKoss
Running through a low end console will certainly degrade your audio quality. Most likely the analog design is not stellar and this will certainly change the sound of your signal.

Ditto on the double mic pre scenario - if there isn't a line in option, try the returns as Joemamma suggested.

Does your pre have a send? Perhaps you could use that for whatever monitoring needs you have and still feed the pre out to the converter directly.
__________________
Shane Koss
Alto NYC
www.altomusic.com/nyc/
shane@altomusic.com
DrKoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007   #5
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234



If you need the console for foldback, it might be better you feed the converter and the console woth a "y" cable.



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007   #6
Gear Guru
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 11,512

It's not a general question that only has one answer. Each console takes it's direct out from a different part of the signal path. Also, it depends where you "enter' the signal path on the console strip. Probably a insert in would be your best choice, but I'm guessing you're still going to have at least one amplifier stage before hitting the direct output. Again, the topography on each console will be different. That's why they have flow charts - so you can see exactly where and how your signal path flows. Sometimes it's worth it to have everything up on the console. Sometimes you want the shortest path and should go directly from the pre to the AD input. You'll have to use your ears on this one and decide for yourself.
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007   #7
Gear Guru
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 11,512

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKoss View Post
Running through a low end console will certainly degrade your audio quality. Most likely the analog design is not stellar and this will certainly change the sound of your signal.

Agreed - to a point. I wouldn't want to come into a mackie console after micing thru a U67 into a 1073, but there are times when it is not only more convenient, but actually preferable sound wise. Like I said before, you've got to use your ears on this one. Personally, I'm more of a straight wire, less is more kind of engineer, but there are definately exceptions to the rule.
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2007   #8
SMT
Gear maniac
 
SMT's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 226

Thread Starter
Send a message via MSN to SMT
Thank you all!!!


Let´s see if I have some time to test different ways today...
SMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
Benmrx's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,300

I say spring for a patchbay.

Set it up so that your nice preamps are half normalled to your AD, and then use a patch cable and take it from the preamp out to the LINE or TAPE input of your board.


BTW, direct outs are usually pre or post fader. Some boards let you switch between the 2. Most live boards have pre-fader direct outs, and most recording consoles have post fader direct outs. This means that regardless of pre or post fader, the direct out is still post insert and post eq. So, direct outs usually travel through the entire channel strip.
__________________
www.mysteriousredx.com

"Sorry man I played guitar instead of going to school." -- James Lugo
Benmrx is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
adding direct outs Disjointed Geekslutz forum 32 6th August 2009 07:21 AM
Channel direct outs vs. sub group outs Joemamma So much gear, so little time! 14 27th May 2007 03:12 AM
Mixer with direct outs? Janesaid2me Low End Theory 12 11th April 2007 09:40 PM
"static-y" bass sound direct jdsowa Low End Theory 1 18th February 2005 08:38 PM
Midas Venice Direct outs? Walling1 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 4 17th January 2004 05:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.