Is their such thing as having too much absorption - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Is their such thing as having too much absorption

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th May 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
HIGHENDONLY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Middlebury CT
Posts: 824

Thread Starter
Is their such thing as having too much absorption

One my room's is 16 by 22. I have the wall's and ceiling treated well, all corner's properly bass trapped. But i have a thick carpet in the room. Now should i remove the carpet to make the room sound more live. It seems that it's almost too muddy sounding with the carpet. So i was thinking if i remove the carpet you would have the floor as the first reflection, instead of the the sound hitting the carpet and being absorped...any idea's
HIGHENDONLY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,289

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIGHENDONLY View Post
One my room's is 16 by 22. I have the wall's and ceiling treated well, all corner's properly bass trapped. But i have a thick carpet in the room. Now should i remove the carpet to make the room sound more live. It seems that it's almost too muddy sounding with the carpet. So i was thinking if i remove the carpet you would have the floor as the first reflection, instead of the the sound hitting the carpet and being absorped...any idea's
Take that shit off the walls and ceiling and look into diffusion. I hate to see people dump so much money and time into absorption only to end up w/ sonic mud. Dissusion and deflection are where it's at.
BOWIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 724

i believe you're wrong Bowie- with regards to a small room like this. absorption is key. diffusion and deflection in a small room will do nothing for standing waves.
i would definitely remove the carpet if your ceiling is well-treated. live floor/dead celing is a standard studio treatment. it's worked very well for me. if you've really got the corners taken care of you'll be in good shape.
beats workin' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007   #4
YZ!
Gear addict
 
YZ!'s Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 426

Quote:
Originally Posted by beats workin' View Post
i believe you're wrong Bowie- with regards to a small room like this. absorption is key. diffusion and deflection in a small room will do nothing for standing waves.
i would definitely remove the carpet if your ceiling is well-treated. live floor/dead ceiling is a standard studio treatment. it's worked very well for me. if you've really got the corners taken care of you'll be in good shape.
I second that.

Taking into consideration that the existing treatment is good.

But keep a small thick rug hanging around to take care of tapping feet...
__________________
Regards,

YZ
YZ! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007   #5
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIGHENDONLY View Post
One my room's is 16 by 22. I have the wall's and ceiling treated well, all corner's properly bass trapped. But i have a thick carpet in the room. Now should i remove the carpet to make the room sound more live. It seems that it's almost too muddy sounding with the carpet. So i was thinking if i remove the carpet you would have the floor as the first reflection, instead of the the sound hitting the carpet and being absorped...any idea's
Your room is large enough to benefit from absorption and diffusion. A reflective floor is great for tracking acoustic instruments, and it's common in one-room studios to have carpet in the front third and wood or linoleum etc in the rear. However, wherever you have a reflective floor you should also have absorption on the ceiling.

As for diffusion, the standard place is the rear wall behind the mix position.

Before you go to all the trouble to tear out the carpet, experiment with pieces of thin plywood or even box cardboard. Lay that down over the carpet and live with it for a week or so to see how you like it.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Sigma's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 4,618

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
Your room is large enough to benefit from absorption and diffusion. A reflective floor is great for tracking acoustic instruments, and it's common in one-room studios to have carpet in the front third and wood or linoleum etc in the rear. However, wherever you have a reflective floor you should also have absorption on the ceiling.

As for diffusion, the standard place is the rear wall behind the mix position.

Before you go to all the trouble to tear out the carpet, experiment with pieces of thin plywood or even box cardboard. Lay that down over the carpet and live with it for a week or so to see how you like it.

--Ethan
i agree

dead rooms blow..

i have diffusers in a 14 x 11 foot room..

designed by nick collerian and it sounds great..you have a much larger space why waste the acoustics?
__________________
"The notes I handle no better than many pianists. But the pauses between the notes, ah, that is where the art resides." Artur Schnabel


http://miketarsia.com

http://www.myspace.com/miketarsia

https://members.grammy365.com/users/mike-tarsia
Sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
ricfoxx's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 516

Too much absorption

Yes there is such a thing. A dead room is musically uninspiring for most recording situations. To get a good lively room in which recordings seems to sparkle is an artform. Experiment until you get the sound you want and good luck to you
ricfoxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2007   #8
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 122

And I totally agree with Ethan W. The most intelligent thing you can do is to go to a hardware store and buy some 3mm plywood (or something similar) that covers a decent area and leave it on the floor for a few days of testing. This way you can hear the reflections off the "hard" floor without ripping up carpet etc. I did this and found that there were all sorts of booming issues I hadn't thought of.

I did some homework and realised why a lot of studios have half the room with wood laminate and half with Carpet. Perhaps a combination may be the best for you as it was for me. So try the temporary piece of wood on the floor first and see how you go before hand.

I also concur that you can deaden a room too much. Try recording an accoustic guitar in a completely dead room. You find yourself hitting the strings really hard to get some tone without noticing your doing it. Live rooms are essentially for being inspired although they can be difficult to record in. A balance between the two is therefore imperative!
deuce42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2007   #9
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,007

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIGHENDONLY View Post
One my room's is 16 by 22. I have the wall's and ceiling treated well, all corner's properly bass trapped. But i have a thick carpet in the room. Now should i remove the carpet to make the room sound more live. It seems that it's almost too muddy sounding with the carpet. So i was thinking if i remove the carpet you would have the floor as the first reflection, instead of the the sound hitting the carpet and being absorped...any idea's
You have gotten some great advice, but just to clarify a little. You can over absorb on the higher end, but when it comes to the low end it is REALLY hard to put in to much bass trapping. What kind of bass trapping do you have in the room now?

Glenn
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK)

See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap
Glenn Kuras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
peeder's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: No longer participating here.
Posts: 6,705

Generally vocal booths are dead, because of two factors I believe...

1) The singer will be monitoring in cans, where some reverb is pumped in, and

2) The vocal track will have reverb put on it anyway.

Thus you don't get into the problem where you are overstrumming an acoustic guitar or overhitting drums or something to get some resonance out of them, and at the same time, you don't get any unwanted, colored early reflections cluttering your choices when adding artificial reverb.
peeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2007   #11
Gear addict
 
SpiderM69's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 423

Probably not ideal, but what about just putting on the carpet some of those plastic carpeting cover thingies used for office chairs with rollers?
__________________
- Steve

It is the essential nature of man to play - Plato
SpiderM69 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
fiberglass n hemp, absorption coefficients HELP clusterchord So much gear, so little time! 5 7th November 2006 02:52 PM
Absorption vs. Diffusion LCD Low End Theory 79 25th October 2006 07:36 AM
brand new Q about broadband absorption acousmatic So much gear, so little time! 3 12th July 2006 05:09 AM
Sound Absorption INDECISIVE_2000 High end 1 23rd April 2005 07:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.