Sick of Pro Tools LE limitations! HD is rediculou$.. What should I change to??? - Page 4 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


Sick of Pro Tools LE limitations! HD is rediculou$.. What should I change to???

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th April 2007   #91
Gear addict
 
Thebassist's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago, Chicago
Posts: 382

Usually I'm doing big sessions- well over 24 tracks, (session last year with 30 vocal tracks!) and grabbing for processor intensive plugs to emulate hardware, and even dipping into RTAS I hit the ceiling all the time. As posted above, we all have different needs, and certainly HD is perfectly viable for alot of people out there. Only a fool would argue that there aren't pros out there mixing ITB and making tons of great sounding albums. But there are also guys mixing OTB as well, regardless of platform, and making equally wonderful sounding albums. We all mix different albums, and we all have different needs and expectations, and many of us see those needs change dramatically from session to session. I just found that PT HD ITB didn't give me the power or flexibility I needed to deliver a consistent product. Of course, with a console and outboard I can do it all day long, but then, why do I need all the ITB power, when a real 1176 sounds soooo good? As always, YMMV. HD + outboard kicks ass, but for me, was just plain redundant.

Hope everybody is enjoying a beautiful Sunday. It finally thawed out in Chicago, and I for one can't wait to get rid of this winter's studio tan...
Thebassist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2007   #92
Lives for gear
 
taturana's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 4,059

Quote:
Originally Posted by redstudio View Post
PRO TOOLS FOR LIFE BABY!!!

HAHAHA

arrrrrrgh!!!!

i´d do myself in... PT my entire life???... i dont think i would survive that...

i second the thought.. that is so 90´s! very outdated....
taturana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2007   #93
JPZ
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 572

>>Of course, with a console and outboard I can do it all day long<<

So then you have like 60 or 70 hardware 1176, LA2's, Pultecs, Fairchilds, insert your favorite vintage box that's emulated by software here, available in your room at all times? Man, that is some studio!
JPZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #94
Gear addict
 
Thebassist's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago, Chicago
Posts: 382

I'd love to see someone with more than one Fairchild. Or even a single plug that sounded that good!

160A>= 90 % of all comp plugs. Easier to use, too!

For that matter, I love my Waves Ren Comp, but end up grabbing even the cheap Pro Vla with NOS tubes for more and more comp duties...

As always.

YMMV.
Thebassist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #95
Lives for gear
 
lowfreq33's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,186

[quote=BradD;1253254]I understand, but the only other really Mac based program is DP, which doesn't really interest me. I love my G4 that I've run PT on for the last six years, but I can buy a Quad Core DAW PC from ADK with 2 gig of ram and four hard drives for around 3K. A similar Mac is much more expensive.

quote]

Actually, if you do a direct comparison, taking into account every spec of both machines, you'll find that the Mac costs a little less. # of cores ? RAM isn't the only thing that matters. Processor speed, bus speed, seek time on the hard drives, etc. Plus OSX is way more stable and faster than windows (yes, even vista), so that's an added bonus. Use what you want, but let's put an end to this "Macs are more expensive than PC's" myth. They just don't make a $300 computer for my mom who just wants to send pictures in her emails.
lowfreq33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #96
Lives for gear
 
taturana's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 4,059

[quote=lowfreq33;1256295]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradD View Post
I understand, but the only other really Mac based program is DP, which doesn't really interest me. I love my G4 that I've run PT on for the last six years, but I can buy a Quad Core DAW PC from ADK with 2 gig of ram and four hard drives for around 3K. A similar Mac is much more expensive.

quote]

Actually, if you do a direct comparison, taking into account every spec of both machines, you'll find that the Mac costs a little less. # of cores ? RAM isn't the only thing that matters. Processor speed, bus speed, seek time on the hard drives, etc. Plus OSX is way more stable and faster than windows (yes, even vista), so that's an added bonus. Use what you want, but let's put an end to this "Macs are more expensive than PC's" myth. They just don't make a $300 computer for my mom who just wants to send pictures in her emails.

it´s really not a myth... for the price i can buy a mac i can make two full blown PC computers... and xp is very stable when correctly setup and assembled with quality parts (no i am not talking about mom´s computer..)...

so in the end Pc´s are faster and cheaper... the drives are the same (so is seek time on the drives) and what kind of bus speed would you be talking about.. they both used the same duo core chips and ddr ram nowadays, and i would guess the bus speeds are the same too...

so i understand you like macs and i respect that but none of your arguments on this post are really valid... do some research... this could be true in the nineties (except for the price which was always higher) but today that simply does not make sense..
taturana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #97
Registered User
 
Anderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 472

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPZ View Post
>>Of course, with a console and outboard I can do it all day long<<

So then you have like 60 or 70 hardware 1176, LA2's, Pultecs, Fairchilds, insert your favorite vintage box that's emulated by software here, available in your room at all times? Man, that is some studio!
Most of LFACs have good EQ and Dynamics sections. So If you have 56chs, you already have 56 very good EQs and Gates, Comps, etc that sound already way better than plugins IMHO... Add to that a decent collection of a high-end boxes and you do have a killer setup.

And suddenly, your DAW becomes more a simple "tape" machine than anything else.

YMMV
Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #98
Gear addict
 
Thebassist's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago, Chicago
Posts: 382

Ah, the new revolution. DAW as tape machine. Ain't it funny how things come full circle? Now everyone wants tape emulation plugs and "vintage warmth..." How long til tape machines become in vogue again? Hoping I can bag a Studer for cheap before the craze hits...
Thebassist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #99
JPZ
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 572

>>Most of LFACs have good EQ and Dynamics sections. So If you have 56chs, you already have 56 very good EQs and Gates, Comps, etc that sound already way better than plugins IMHO... Add to that a decent collection of a high-end boxes and you do have a killer setup.>>

So that's what all those extra knobs on my ssl are?
JPZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #100
Registered User
 
Anderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 472

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thebassist View Post
Ah, the new revolution. DAW as tape machine. Ain't it funny how things come full circle? Now everyone wants tape emulation plugs and "vintage warmth..." How long til tape machines become in vogue again? Hoping I can bag a Studer for cheap before the craze hits...
True... Keep one for me!


Wait... Errr...


Nah.


Keep 2!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPZ View Post
So that's what all those extra knobs on my ssl are?
I'm curious, do you have a 4k, 6k, 9k? Duality? Pics! Pics! Pics!
Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #101
JPZ
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 572

Sadly (or not) no 4k anymore. Still got a lot of parts all nicely boxed for clients who want that "ssl sound" ee. I did keep a lovely modded to the hilt quad 8 if your interested. Beautiful sound and only weighs about 2 .5 tons....here, let me sweep the dust off for you....
JPZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #102
Registered User
 
Anderson's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 472

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPZ View Post
Sadly (or not) no 4k anymore. Still got a lot of parts all nicely boxed for clients who want that "ssl sound" ee. I did keep a lovely modded to the hilt quad 8 if your interested. Beautiful sound and only weighs about 2 .5 tons....here, let me sweep the dust off for you....
Hmmmm... *cough* Ahem *cough*

Last edited by Anderson; 30th April 2007 at 06:48 PM.. Reason: more to say.
Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #103
Lives for gear
 
The Spark's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 593

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thebassist View Post
Ah, the new revolution. DAW as tape machine.
Or even better, buy a RADAR.
The Spark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #104
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 3,728

Or at a minimum, get yourself an HD1 and a Quad Mac.
With a 192 you could run at least 96 tracks at 24/96k.
Also with a Quad Mac, you could have the best of both worlds.
Lot's of RTAS power and Accel plugins on the core card.
__________________
Hybrid mixing is the present for some and the future for us all!

http://petesplaceaudio.com/ Mark VIII/BAC-500/Electrodyne 501 Mic Pre/511 EQ/Blast Pad
Tony Shepperd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th April 2007   #105
Lives for gear
 
mixerguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,002

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Shepperd View Post
Or at a minimum, get yourself an HD1 and a Quad Mac.
With a 192 you could run at least 96 tracks at 24/96k.
Also with a Quad Mac, you could have the best of both worlds.
Lot's of RTAS power and Accel plugins on the core card.
true.

and - perhaps this year we'll see new HD hardware from Digi...
mixerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2007   #106
Gear addict
 
SUGARCULT666's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Sydney/Perth Australia
Posts: 356

Thread Starter
I think I'll give Nuendo or Cubase a shot and maybe one day if Digidesign become cool and make LE more flexible I might change back... Or maybe not... I think M-Powered was a pretty sad attempt... They could at least put the option of adding ADC in the music production toolkit that you pay $600 for (The price of cubase).
__________________
www.myspace.com/thedirtysecrets
SUGARCULT666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2008   #107
Gear Head
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 37

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUGARCULT666 View Post
No ADC/track limits/hardware limits etc it's bullsh*t!... I don't have 10g for HD so which program is the easiest change over for a pro tools user??? I'm thinking maybe cubase but I've heard it's nothing like pro tools in how to use it... Any suggestions? The easier the change over the better... Reaper???
Are you looking for mixing and production? or are you just trying to mix ?
neuendo is the equal of protools Hd and some! It kicks protools ass at this point .I've been wroking with protools for 10year now,and switch like 4 years ago.The new neundo 4 is soooooooooooo hoooot ! it is the shiiitt! i ruun 32 channels of in/out every with no problem ! None .i mix with hd in VA in january .It was a nightmare.i kept having shut down after shut down.Hell i felt like i was on windows 98 with protools.it suck.An do not update the mac os with your hd system it will go crazy!
Neundo homie ! neundo!(Or logic)


nrup is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Watching Others Using Pro Tools" Program!!!!! WOUPT Kenny Gioia So much gear, so little time! 22 21st May 2007 06:46 PM
Best Windows based DAW program - NOT Pro Tools...????? bjm007 Music computers 263 4th September 2006 01:20 AM
Midi Issues With Program inside Program MACHINE Music computers 0 6th March 2006 11:01 PM
Thinking about 'tools. Sirocco Q&A with Charles Dye 4 22nd May 2004 02:44 AM
Thinking about 'tools. Sirocco Music computers 3 6th May 2004 06:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.