![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Otari MX5050 BII tech in Baltimore/DC? | theron d | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 20th July 2006 07:13 AM |
| Otari MX5050: B2HD vs BII motors | Mike Jasper | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 29th June 2006 07:24 PM |
| Otari 5050 2-Track | drumkideric | So much gear, so little time! | 15 | 13th April 2006 01:58 PM |
| Otari 5050 8SD | shaddai | Geekslutz forum | 12 | 4th April 2006 12:58 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA
Posts: 1,211
| OTARI MX-5050 BII Anyone currently using a 5050 or have any experience with one? I just bought one and i'm pretty stoked about it. I haven't received it yet though- it's being shipped right now. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 2,585
| we used them for tape copies...i i sold 3 for 200 dollars each about 6 years ago..decent machines |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA
Posts: 1,211
| Thanks Sigma! You may see I posted a similar thread over on the Post forum (since it's more specialized). I'm planning on using it from time to time whenever the moment calls. What are you using now in place of those machines? |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: phallicdelphia
Posts: 2,585
| Quote:
we calibrated our Dolbys so well that when the SR's came out and we got a beta test they said most studios wern't as anal as us so the diff was much more than we heard..umm almost nil today? Protools which I used to call blowtools..old days 1 hr of calibration every session.people not saying + whatever OVER 185 NWB per meter..[ err what does + 6 mean?]when ya got an out side tape....the whole 3M and Ampex undercut/over cut tape width head stack transport burn in crapola in the late 70's early 80's ...later day formulations that increased shedding it's like LP's ..everyone forgets time verses volume..inner band compensation sheit etc etc..[then also how many early CD's were mastered with the EQ settings that were made for LP medium compensation ?] digital may not be at its zenith yet but it is getting damn close..i opt for digital [i did a 180 on it in the last few years] yeah tape can be awesome but it is an art and a compromise | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |